PDA

View Full Version : Tiger boss bites back


GVGjr
03-04-2007, 05:35 AM
Tiger boss bites back (http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/tiger-boss-bites-back/2007/04/02/1175366160434.html)

RICHMOND president Gary March yesterday launched a blistering attack on Western Bulldogs counterpart David Smorgon, condemning the Dogs as a charity case unable to win a premiership or make a profit in the past 50 years.

In a fiery defence of star Nathan Brown and coach Terry Wallace — both former Bulldogs — March savaged Smorgon.

"I was very very disappointed with what David said … it was such a personal and unprovoked attack on one of our players," March said.

"I think David should concentrate on getting his own house in order before having a crack at us: they haven't won a premiership for over 50 years and haven't made a profit in about the same time. I can't remember the last time they made a profit and they are having a crack at us and our players, I just won't cop that."

The war of words erupted after Smorgon declared on Sunday, before the match against Geelong, that his club was better off without All-Australian Brown, who he claimed had been a greedy, self-absorbed character who left to chase money.

Smorgon also ridiculed a column written by Wallace that praised the Bulldogs list, suggesting the Bulldog players had laughed at it and Wallace should "move on".

March said he was astonished by Smorgon's comments and was at a loss to understand what had inspired him. "David might say his club is better off without Nathan Brown, I can say our club is infinitely better off with Nathan Brown," March said.

"We made Nathan Brown a vice-captain of the club because of his exemplary behaviour and example to our younger players and his work in the community is a key part of that. I really do not understand where David was coming from in attacking Nathan or Terry.

"We are not going to stand by and let our players be attacked by another club president. It is not the position of a club president to be attacking opposition players — leave that to coaches and players to talk about opposition teams. If David wants to have a go at someone, have a go at me but leave our players alone.

"We didn't come out and have a go at Ryan Griffen when he had a go at our players, we let it go — he is a young player — but David should know better. It is time he got his own house in order."

Griffen last year attracted criticism for observing that Richmond had given up after half-time in its loss to the Dogs.

"As a club, we have been very supportive of the Bulldogs and the help they have been given by the AFL. But unlike them, we have not gone to the AFL in our history with our hand out," March said.

"We have got ourselves back up on our feet by ourselves, we made a million dollars last year and we will make another million this year. And we believe we are heading in the right direction on the field."

Richmond received $250,000 from the AFL's special distribution fund last year — the Bulldogs received $1.7 million — but March said this related to stadium deals and was not a charity payment.

The weekend's eruption is the latest in a spiteful history, which includes the nasty off-the-ball incident between Tony Liberatore and Matthew Knights and put then Richmond captain Wayne Campbell in an awkward position with regard to the players' code of silence on incriminating an opponent at the tribunal. (Campbell is now employed at Whitten Oval as a specialist coach.)

That tension was heightened at the end of 2003, when Brown quit to join Richmond, while Wallace sensationally left the Bulldogs a week before the end of the 2002 season.

Twodogs
03-04-2007, 08:14 AM
I'm sick of this already.

bornadog
03-04-2007, 09:31 AM
This is not a swipe at Smorgon, this is a swipe at every bulldog supporter, how dare he bring up premierships and profitability. The last president that did that dissapeared and his club is now bankrupt. (Carlton). I hate Richmond and their supporters with a passion.

Topdog
03-04-2007, 09:57 AM
Wow he actually sounded even more childish than Smorgon.

westdog54
03-04-2007, 10:33 AM
What is it with Richmond Presidents having cheapshots at our club? First that Dud Clinton Casey, now this tool.

All Smorgon did was say that he was glad Nathan Brown left, purely on the basis that he wanted people at the club who wanted to be there, not for the money but for the club.

So what does that muckraking club do? Bring Premierships and finances into it.

Here's a tip, make the finals in the next 3 years then we'll talk.

LoveTheDogs
03-04-2007, 11:09 AM
It makes me laugh that the media elicit these types of stoushes between Clubs and then get on their high horses and ask 'What was David thinking?'.

As I understand it, David was asked about the Club's ability to hold on to its' players and responded by saying that in recent times, Nathan Brown is the only player we have lost that we would (at the time) have liked to hold on to. Having worked for the Club at the time Nathan was playing, I can honestly say that Nathan was clearly a great player, he was difficult when it came to fulfilling his off-field obligations and was not fully committed to the Club in this area - I am sure if asked, he would be the first to admit this. What that meant was that Nathan's obligations always tended to fall back on the players that we knew would help out at the last minute (eg Brad Johnson) and so I guess you could say that Nathan wasn't completely a team player.

Perhaps he has matured and changed now, but I agree with David, that we are a better Club and whilst it seemed ludricous at the time to let Nathan go, I never give him a second thought when the Dogs are out on the field now, because we don't need him.

As for Richmond themselves and their comments ......... who cares?

southerncross
03-04-2007, 09:03 PM
What is it with Richmond Presidents having cheapshots at our club? First that Dud Clinton Casey, now this tool.

All Smorgon did was say that he was glad Nathan Brown left, purely on the basis that he wanted people at the club who wanted to be there, not for the money but for the club.

So what does that muckraking club do? Bring Premierships and finances into it.

Here's a tip, make the finals in the next 3 years then we'll talk.

Spot on Westdog especially the last point :D

southerncross
03-04-2007, 09:03 PM
It makes me laugh that the media elicit these types of stoushes between Clubs and then get on their high horses and ask 'What was David thinking?'.

As I understand it, David was asked about the Club's ability to hold on to its' players and responded by saying that in recent times, Nathan Brown is the only player we have lost that we would (at the time) have liked to hold on to. Having worked for the Club at the time Nathan was playing, I can honestly say that Nathan was clearly a great player, he was difficult when it came to fulfilling his off-field obligations and was not fully committed to the Club in this area - I am sure if asked, he would be the first to admit this. What that meant was that Nathan's obligations always tended to fall back on the players that we knew would help out at the last minute (eg Brad Johnson) and so I guess you could say that Nathan wasn't completely a team player.

Perhaps he has matured and changed now, but I agree with David, that we are a better Club and whilst it seemed ludricous at the time to let Nathan go, I never give him a second thought when the Dogs are out on the field now, because we don't need him.

As for Richmond themselves and their comments ......... who cares?

Terrific first up post LoveTheDogs. Welcome to WOOF by the way.

BulldogBelle
03-04-2007, 10:50 PM
A bit of verbal banter between the two Prez's talks up the impending match in Round 4 will make for an interesting battle against our two teams. Fiery, chestbeating stuff, I am awaiting the encounter with great enthusiasm. Hopefully, Wayne Campbell has given Eade some valuable info on the Richmond way of life. Bring it on I say!