Re: Training 2nd Feb 2007
What does everyone think about the way we selected in the draft? It appears much more likely that Hughes and Harbrow are closer to senior games this year than Stack and Hill, O'Shea etc.
Does anyone feel that we should have perhaps put one of Harbrow/Hughes on the senior list, and rookied one of the younger kids who are less likely to play this year?
Or does doing that leave us open to having our rookies taken by someone else if they are playing well?
Re: Training 2nd Feb 2007
Also, does Streets injury at this time help Skipper out at all as far as making the team, or perhaps getting the NAB games to show his wares?
Re: Training 2nd Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by
McMahon#23
What does everyone think about the way we selected in the draft? It appears much more likely that Hughes and Harbrow are closer to senior games this year than Stack and Hill, O'Shea etc.
Does anyone feel that we should have perhaps put one of Harbrow/Hughes on the senior list, and rookied one of the younger kids who are less likely to play this year?
Or does doing that leave us open to having our rookies taken by someone else if they are playing well?
If our rookies are performing, than i would imagine that we would take them automatically.
With the retirements of Grant and Monty. And the possibility not all of DMAC, Faulkner and Skipper will make it. Than that lends to the idea that well have a few spots open up at the end of the year, and put us in position to promote any of our rookies.
But you must also remember re: Hughes and Harbrow. None of the 16 teams took them in the ND or PSD, and were looked over by pretty well every other club in the RD. There must have been an obvious reason, so i have faith Clayton and Eade got it right. And from training reports, i hope the boys can mix it up at the Bees and push for elevation.
Re: Training 2nd Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by
McMahon#23
Also, does Streets injury at this time help Skipper out at all as far as making the team, or perhaps getting the NAB games to show his wares?
Could be Skips last roll of the dice. If he can get a month in the team that should be good for him. But if he fails to perform, than he might ne in strife. Which unfortunately for him, i think he might be in anyways.
Re: Training 2nd Feb 2007
Hey Billy Blog, do ya think there is something wrong with Robbo?
Re: Training 2nd Feb 2007
Which of the rookies have been the most impressive? Could all bar West play if they were needed?
Re: Training 2nd Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dry Rot
Which of the rookies have been the most impressive? Could all bar West play if they were needed?
Harbrow has been the most exciting, Hughes the most polished and Pask is getting better.
My guess is Hughes and Pask are currently better suited to play senior football but Harbrow might surprise. MWest is a fair way off.
In response to charmdog, Im told Robbo is OK and not that far off from stepping up his training a fair bit.