-
2017 Rookie List
Ok, first assumption is the rookie list remains. The second assumption is Wallis & Redders are doing 12 months rehab and will be on the long term injury list, therefore two rookies can be promoted until they get back in the park mid-late 2017.
So what's our rookie list strategy now? Do we need two ready to go AFL players for depth? Does Adcock get a reprieve? Do we keep Lynch there as a second year rookie looking to have him take an opportunity? Do we continue to mine for gems irregardless?
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
As for this year, do we elevate any rookies in Adcock, Roarke or Lynch?
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
As for this year, do we elevate any rookies in Adcock, Roarke or Lynch?
I think we can get through the rest of the year without an upgrade.
I certainly don't want Adcock in to replace Wally, but I bet he does depending on his form today.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
bornadog
I think we can get through the rest of the year without an upgrade.
I certainly don't want Adcock in to replace Wally, but I bet he does depending on his form today.
Why is that? You know I'm going to ask
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
Why is that? You know I'm going to ask
Ok, when he did play earlier in the year, I just didn't see the contribution he should have been making for such an experienced player. Picking up an average of 14 disposals in his 6 games to me was a poor return.
How is he going today?
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Definitely not Adcock and we need to keep SMith and Lynch , Smith is in his second year and I think we can keep him on another year due to injury .. The rule is only two years I believe , Lynch has another year.
Smith I would upgrade.
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
I am with you bad, no Adcock. I was pro drafting him but he looks cooked at AFL level. Losing a yard off his pace has been deadly to his career.
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
Rocco Jones
I am with you bad, no Adcock. I was pro drafting him but he looks cooked at AFL level. Losing a yard off his pace has been deadly to his career.
Yeah absolutely no to Adcock. Doesn't add much other than a solid player in a few respects, and I feel we would be better served by someone like Webb whose trajectory is going upwards even if he would have similiar current output.
I should leave it alone but you're not right
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Ok, first assumption is the rookie list remains. The second assumption is Wallis & Redders are doing 12 months rehab and will be on the long term injury list, therefore two rookies can be promoted until they get back in the park mid-late 2017.
So what's our rookie list strategy now? Do we need two ready to go AFL players for depth? Does Adcock get a reprieve? Do we keep Lynch there as a second year rookie looking to have him take an opportunity? Do we continue to mine for gems irregardless?
Do we know for sure that Wally's rehab will be 12 months?
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
Do we know for sure that Wally's rehab will be 12 months?
DEpends the spot he has broken his foot. Doc Larkin says could be back for round one on best case.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
Do we know for sure that Wally's rehab will be 12 months?
It seems to be near identical to Jake's broken leg. Looking at Judas Brown and others who have done similar, about 12 months to get to AFL game ready fitness is an uneducated guess on my part being that he's broken both bones in the leg.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
It seems to be near identical to Jake's broken leg. Looking at Judas Brown and others who have done similar, about 12 months to get to AFL game ready fitness is an uneducated guess on my part being that he's broken both bones in the leg.
David Young, our orthopedic surgeon, pretty much indicated that with such a break for running athletes any return inside 12 months runs a risk although they would be doing their best to get Wally ready earlier. Apparently Mitch is going into surgery today.
Jack will undergo his third knee reconstruction, his first on his right knee and will be a traditional reco.
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
Doc26
David Young, our orthopedic surgeon, pretty much indicated that with such a break for running athletes any return inside 12 months runs a risk although they would be doing their best to get Wally ready earlier. Aparrently Mitch is going into surgery today.
Jack will undergo his third knee reconstruction, his first on his right knee and will be a traditional reco.
No evidence to back this up but it seems so much harder for guys who break both bones to come back the same player, Nathan Brown never was. The steadier we take it the better
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
lemmon
No evidence to back this up but it seems so much harder for guys who break both bones to come back the same player, Nathan Brown never was. The steadier we take it the better
Counterpoint: Dale Morris. As good/better than ever, though it did take some time.
-
Re: 2017 Rookie List
Originally Posted by
lemmon
No evidence to back this up but it seems so much harder for guys who break both bones to come back the same player, Nathan Brown never was. The steadier we take it the better
As well as Dale Morris, Michael Voss also had a similar lower leg fracture (albeit younger than Mitch).
Players can come back from it but I think all of 2017 is a wipeout for Mitch.
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers