-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
If you take out one of the worst quarters of all time by Suckling, it was ok. Seriously, it was like he took a Valium.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
Tom was better than he was last week and better in the second half than he was in the first half today I thought.
He was utterly frustrating at times. But today wasn't his worst game. Giventhat he lost lost his main support in Boyd early I thought he battled the game out well and gradually got on top of Pruest's influence around the ground. By the end of the game Goldstein wasn't getting on the end of handball chains and running into open goals either.
Big Tom wasn't Gary Dempsey today but he wasn't Terry de Koning either. We really need Roughead back though to give us that fourth midfielder around the contest. TC isn't ever going to provide that.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
1. Tom Libba is struggling and we really need him
2. Clay Smith was basically useless tonight
3. Mclean stepped up in the midfield and had a great game.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
1. The emergency umpire No'35 Andre Gianfagna should have got a gig well before the other 3.
2. Tom Campbell deserves credit for his game today as does Matt Suckling for turning his game around and being effective in the second half.
3. Once again, Fletcher Roberts is becoming a very assured defender and I am happy for my bakings of him last year to be proven wrong.
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
Originally Posted by
chef
I thought Campbell was immense and Suckling had a good second half.
1. I thought Tom was very solid around the stoppages and grew as the game went on. Probably in our best half dozen given what he was up against in Goldstein and Preuss, with no support after TBoyd's concussion.
2. Given North have snared Higgins and Hrovat off us in consecutive drafts can we try and pry Cunnington from them. Outstanding game from him and would suit our game incredibly well.
3. What was with Easton tonight? Looked out of sorts.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
Originally Posted by
Doc26
1. I thought Tom was very solid around the stoppages and grew as the game went on. Probably in our best half dozen given what he was up against in Goldstein and Preuss, with no support after TBoyd's concussion.
2. Given North have snared Higgins and Hrovat off us in consecutive drafts can we try and pry Cunnington from them. Outstanding game from him and would suit our game incredibly well.
3. What was with Easton tonight? Looked out of sorts.
Have been a wrap for Cunnington for ages. He's a Scott West clone
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
Originally Posted by
lemmon
Have been a wrap for Cunnington for ages. He's a Scott West clone
We can keep our draft picks this year and get Rhylee West next year. He's literally a Scott West son/clone.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
1. Frustrating game but great we found what was required to win
2. We miss Dickson - his reliable leading, finishing and defensive work
3. Forward line needs serious thought
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
1, I thought that Tom Campbell's second and third efforts following the ruck contest reminded me of Ben Hudson. On a number of occasions he either trapped the ball in, got a handball out, or actually managed to get a kick in himself. Great improvement and effort from him.
2. Without Luke Dahlhaus we would probably be 1-3 rather than 3-1 at this stage.
3. When did random long bombs into the forwards become our preferred method of attack ?
The truth will set you free,
but first it will piss you off. ... Gloria Steinem.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
Originally Posted by
comrade
If you take out one of the worst quarters of all time by Suckling, it was ok. Seriously, it was like he took a Valium.
Suckling had a shocking patch for ten minutes but otherwise he was one of the few that looked like making something happen.
I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
Originally Posted by
Jeanette54
1, I thought that Tom Campbell's second and third efforts following the ruck contest reminded me of Ben Hudson. On a number of occasions he either trapped the ball in, got a handball out, or actually managed to get a kick in himself. Great improvement and effort from him.
2. Without Luke Dahlhaus we would probably be 1-3 rather than 3-1 at this stage.
3. When did random long bombs into the forwards become our preferred method of attack ?
Probably 2009 or 10.
And we never looked back despite never having a forward line the suited it.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
1. There aren't many things more enjoyable than watching JJ hit the ball at full speed.
2. Watching The Bont waltz through a defence and kick a goal is one of them.
3. Jake Stringer can even make 'bunny ears' look cool.
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
1. Our resilience is still there
2. The third up rule and the player nominating is an embarrassment
3. Brad Scott still carries on like a fanboy in the coaches box . It's embarrassing !
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
Originally Posted by
Rocket Science
I'll take a dozen of whatever you've been drinking please.
Sorry, saw it another way. Granted Campbell faced quality opposition today but honestly, he's Minson-lite, without the ability to win physical contests. Gets knocked around and out-positioned far too easily for a bloke his size in his role.
As for Suckers, he's gravy when we're going well and utterly maddening when we're not. That ain't necessarily news tho.
This is my knock. Look to his credit he put the howlers in the 1st half behind him and was a key to getting the win. I still think he struggles to make best 22 if we're healthy.
-
Re: Three things I've learned. Round 4 vs North
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
Tom was better than he was last week and better in the second half than he was in the first half today I thought.
He was utterly frustrating at times. But today wasn't his worst game. Giventhat he lost lost his main support in Boyd early I thought he battled the game out well and gradually got on top of Pruest's influence around the ground. By the end of the game Goldstein wasn't getting on the end of handball chains and running into open goals either.
Big Tom wasn't Gary Dempsey today but he wasn't Terry de Koning either. We really need Roughead back though to give us that fourth midfielder around the contest. TC isn't ever going to provide that.
I can't think of three things, because I'm chortling too much at the Terry de Koning reference. Well played Two Dogs!!! I thought I'd forgotten all about him. But it now all comes back to me... priceless..
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes