Thanks Thanks:  4
Likes Likes:  60
Page 9 of 17 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 247
  1. #121
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Qld.
    Posts
    9,642
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    One incident doesn't lose a game.
    Tell Bevo that

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,738
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog4life View Post
    Tell Bevo that
    That's just emotion talking and the obvious act that lead to their last quarter spark. They could have just as easy have played like that in the last without the Selduck goal.

    Bad umpiring decisions cost us at least two goals and then there were the misses again. And once again we refuse to put anyone on Dangerfield early and Selduck late.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  3. Likes bornadog liked this post
  4. #123
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,438
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by always right View Post
    You don't really think posters are being serious do you?
    I'm almost certain some people are

  5. #124
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,040
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    That's just emotion talking and the obvious act that lead to their last quarter spark. They could have just as easy have played like that in the last without the Selduck goal.

    Bad umpiring decisions cost us at least two goals and then there were the misses again. And once again we refuse to put anyone on Dangerfield early and Selduck late.
    What Cloke did mouthing off was poor and undisciplined, but how much time does Selwood need to have prior opportunity? That was a shit non-decision but sadly not surprising in the modern game. I don't want to hear that it was in the back either - those types of tackles when there is clear prior opportunity have been paid HTB forever. I would have been just as pissed off if I was Cloke.
    "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

  6. Likes ratsmac, AndrewP6, Bulldog Joe, SonofScray liked this post
  7. #125
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hillside. (carn the sharks)
    Posts
    3,906
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    What Cloke did mouthing off was poor and undisciplined, but how much time does Selwood need to have prior opportunity? That was a shit non-decision but sadly not surprising in the modern game. I don't want to hear that it was in the back either - those types of tackles when there is clear prior opportunity have been paid HTB forever. I would have been just as pissed off if I was Cloke.
    100 likes! That's how I saw it as well.
    They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
    Brian Fantana.

  8. #126
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine
    Posts
    6,245
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Topdog View Post
    Why? Its just one of those peculiar stats that means nothing.
    Did you leave your sense of humour at the door Topdog?

  9. #127
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,738
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    What Cloke did mouthing off was poor and undisciplined, but how much time does Selwood need to have prior opportunity? That was a shit non-decision but sadly not surprising in the modern game. I don't want to hear that it was in the back either - those types of tackles when there is clear prior opportunity have been paid HTB forever. I would have been just as pissed off if I was Cloke.
    I'm hearing you.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  10. #128
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    What Cloke did mouthing off was poor and undisciplined, but how much time does Selwood need to have prior opportunity? That was a shit non-decision but sadly not surprising in the modern game. I don't want to hear that it was in the back either - those types of tackles when there is clear prior opportunity have been paid HTB forever. I would have been just as pissed off if I was Cloke.
    Yes. Selwood getting away with things we were getting penalised for and worse. Absolute protected species.

  11. #129
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine
    Posts
    6,245
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Has been reported that Riewoldt will miss this week with a knee.

  12. Likes Danny the snakeman liked this post
  13. #130
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,681
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozza View Post
    Has been reported that Riewoldt will miss this week with a knee.
    That's huge, but we have a history of playing B grade forwards into form.
    Josh Bruce, come on down.
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  14. Likes Topdog liked this post
  15. #131
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,567
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Mofra View Post
    That's huge, but we have a history of playing B grade forwards into form.
    Josh Bruce, come on down.
    So if St.Kilda structure up with Bruce (197), McCartin (194) & Membrey (188) do we go with Adams (192), Morris (190) & Wood (187) or do we need to add a Cordy or Roberts to the mix?

  16. #132
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    60,862
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    So if St.Kilda structure up with Bruce (197), McCartin (194) & Membrey (188) do we go with Adams (192), Morris (190) & Wood (187) or do we need to add a Cordy or Roberts to the mix?
    I would add Roberts.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  17. #133
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,681
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    I would add Roberts.
    Ditto. Gives us flexibility to throw Adams forward for a few minutes to disrupt the Saints planning and Membrey despite being 188cm is a leading/marking type player who plays taller than (for example) 191cm Stringer or 191cm Stevie J.
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  18. #134
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Algester, Qld
    Posts
    8,180
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    I'd be inclined to go Cordy. He would give us further positional flexibility. Lets' face it if Saints are moving the ball quickly into their forward line, we're going to be in trouble in a one on one in most instances. Our defense is predicated on outnumbering the forwards in a marking contest. And that is achieved by not allowing quick ball movement from further up the ground.

    Cordy has the ability to get to more contests than Roberts, and also has the added ability that should a tactical opportunity arise we can also move him or Adams up forward.
    Beveridge seems to place value on that sort of flexibility and in the case of Riewoldt being a non-starter I'd be going with Cordy.

  19. #135
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine
    Posts
    6,245
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Match Committee: Round 10 vs St Kilda

    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Hotel Foxtrot View Post
    I'd be inclined to go Cordy. He would give us further positional flexibility. Lets' face it if Saints are moving the ball quickly into their forward line, we're going to be in trouble in a one on one in most instances. Our defense is predicated on outnumbering the forwards in a marking contest. And that is achieved by not allowing quick ball movement from further up the ground.

    Cordy has the ability to get to more contests than Roberts, and also has the added ability that should a tactical opportunity arise we can also move him or Adams up forward.
    Beveridge seems to place value on that sort of flexibility and in the case of Riewoldt being a non-starter I'd be going with Cordy.
    Tend to agree YHF. A little bit concern height wise that Bruce does generally try to take the ball from its highest point - but that concern is out-weighed by the flexibility that Cordy gives us.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •