-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Well done umpires. Another one for you guys... Um, Geelong...
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Chris Scott. Blurrgghhh......
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Why was Dixon asked to play on????
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Originally Posted by
comrade
That was hideous.
Exactly my thoughts.
I just hate seeing reward for tackling well non paid. I only really watched one quarter one this game but hell I could have counted close to 10 not paid for Port in that quarter.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Why was Dixon asked to play on????
Took to long I think.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
I am speechless after watching that. I feel for Port and I don't like them at all.
Dixon called to play on after the shot clock was 30.00001 seconds. Ffs what has the game with no rules become?
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Originally Posted by
ratsmac
I am speechless after watching that. I feel for Port and I don't like them at all.
Dixon called to play on after the shot clock was 30.00001 seconds. Ffs what has the game with no rules become?
That was an absolutely terrible use of the shot clock. He wasn't milking it, he wasn't trying anything sneaky. He took a hit when he went to ground, took some time to get up and was walking in as they called it. Unbelievable. Reeks of the umpires doing everything they could to get Geelong over the line.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Originally Posted by
G-Mo77
Exactly my thoughts.
I just hate seeing reward for tackling well non paid. I only really watched one quarter one this game but hell I could have counted close to 10 not paid for Port in that quarter.
I only watched the last 13 minutes and I was flabbergasted. The Hawkins one was a joke, and Dixon non shot . Port missed easy goals in the last 5 minutes.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
And how's the free to Henderson deep in defence for a phantom block when Gray was absolutely manhandled.
There needs to be a huge backlash that hopefully helps turn the tide for a few weeks, like we've copped all year.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
The scary thing about the shot clock violation...... could this be the rule of the round?
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Originally Posted by
comrade
And how's the free to Henderson deep in defence for a phantom block when Gray was absolutely manhandled.
There needs to be a huge backlash that hopefully helps turn the tide for a few weeks, like we've copped all year.
The man handling by the Geelong backs was constant, especially on Robbie Gray
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Originally Posted by
comrade
That was an absolutely terrible use of the shot clock. He wasn't milking it, he wasn't trying anything sneaky. He took a hit when he went to ground, took some time to get up and was walking in as they called it. Unbelievable. Reeks of the umpires doing everything they could to get Geelong over the line.
Watch the footage, you see the Geelong players set up ten metres away from Dixon each side of the start of his run up appealing for the clock violation to be called.
Question is, did the umpire react to the clock or the appealing?
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Originally Posted by
bornadog
The man handling by the Geelong backs was constant, especially on Robbie Gray
The umpires in Geelong are worse than the Perth umps.
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
-
Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion
Originally Posted by
jeemak
Watch the footage, you see the Geelong players set up ten metres away from Dixon each side of the start of his run up appealing for the clock violation to be called.
Question is, did the umpire react to the clock or the appealing?
I'd have to double check the rule, but doesn't it start once you get up off the ground? If not, the rule is a shambles.
And to answer your question, I'd say they definitely reacted to the appealing. Smart (yet unethical) by the Cats players to suck the umpire in and shame on the umpire for falling for it.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.