Should Brad Johnson be captain in 2009? Im not so sure considering he only has one or two years left. Any thoughts?
Should Brad Johnson be captain in 2009? Im not so sure considering he only has one or two years left. Any thoughts?
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
If I had to choose I would select Cross purely on work ethic on and off the track. But I understand its not only about those qualities.
My concern is if Johnson holds onto it for the next two years I think we would have to bypass the Gia, Murphy, Cross age bracket as again we'd be asking the same question in 2 years time. I think we should make the change now and let Cross or Gia have it for 3-5 years and develop a younger guy to take it over as they are finishing up.
I am a fan of players giving the captaincy up a year or 2 before they retire.It ensures a smooth transition. Its really only a title and everyone should be a leader in there own way. If he gave it up to a younger guy now you would still have his leadership but we would be grooming someone at the same time. It gives you someone to bounce things off and to pull you up if your going the wrong way about something.
Brad Johnson the leader of the team, he should remain captain.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
For mine, Crossy shows what it takes, although the likes of Murph & Gia would probably be seen as players with the runs on the board, although there is something about Gia that doesn't quite sit well with me, Murph would be a more POSITIVE leader of the two in my opinion.
The likes of Griffen, Cooney, Higgins etc are way off even being considered taking the top job.