Thanks Thanks:  2
Likes Likes:  11
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 198

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    9,517
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Very dissapointing
    Yeah it is but am I alone in thinking 4 weeks is just a tad OTT. Someone who is found to take drugs gets a 3 strike policy and is hidden away so know one will find out but yet if you call someone a name it warrants a harsher penalty that deliberately knocking someone out on the field or shooting up cocaine.

    I'm against racially vilifying someone but thinks it's far to much of a penalty.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,738
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by G-Mo77 View Post
    Yeah it is but am I alone in thinking 4 weeks is just a tad OTT. Someone who is found to take drugs gets a 3 strike policy and is hidden away so know one will find out but yet if you call someone a name it warrants a harsher penalty that deliberately knocking someone out on the field or shooting up cocaine.

    I'm against racially vilifying someone but thinks it's far to much of a penalty.
    Agree.

    This penalty is a bloody disgrace.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Yarraville
    Posts
    9,882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Pretty poor behaviour from Sherman, it's not as if he's a kid. A player who's played over 100 games should know better.
    Western Bulldogs: We exist to win premierships

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by G-Mo77 View Post
    Yeah it is but am I alone in thinking 4 weeks is just a tad OTT. Someone who is found to take drugs gets a 3 strike policy and is hidden away so know one will find out but yet if you call someone a name it warrants a harsher penalty that deliberately knocking someone out on the field or shooting up cocaine.

    I'm against racially vilifying someone but thinks it's far to much of a penalty.
    Yup, or even giving someone an elbow behind play & you only get 2 weeks!
    85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    9,517
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    I'm glad I'm not alone. He'll be vilified for the rest of his career now. IMO that is penalty enough.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by G-Mo77 View Post
    Yeah it is but am I alone in thinking 4 weeks is just a tad OTT. Someone who is found to take drugs gets a 3 strike policy and is hidden away so know one will find out but yet if you call someone a name it warrants a harsher penalty that deliberately knocking someone out on the field or shooting up cocaine.

    I'm against racially vilifying someone but thinks it's far to much of a penalty.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Coon Dog View Post
    Yup, or even giving someone an elbow behind play & you only get 2 weeks!
    Racially vilifying somebody — especially a first gamer — is far worse in my opinion than smoking some pot or giving somebody an elbow behind play.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Behind the goals, Geelong Rd end
    Posts
    6,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by BornAScragger View Post
    Racially vilifying somebody — especially a first gamer — is far worse in my opinion than smoking some pot or giving somebody an elbow behind play.
    And here's my mum telling me all those years ' sticks and stones ...'

    The world's gone mad.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,716
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by Sockeye Salmon View Post
    And here's my mum telling me all those years ' sticks and stones ...'

    .
    Racial vilification is worse than sticks and stones, it has other connotations.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Behind the goals, Geelong Rd end
    Posts
    6,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Racial vilification is worse than sticks and stones, it has other connotations.
    I can't accept that calling someone names is worse than elbowing someone in the head

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kyabram
    Posts
    13,974
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by Sockeye Salmon View Post
    I can't accept that calling someone names is worse than elbowing someone in the head
    Are you Anglo?
    The curse is dead.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    flemington
    Posts
    2,886
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by Sockeye Salmon View Post
    I can't accept that calling someone names is worse than elbowing someone in the head
    Sockeye. I completely and utterly disagree with you.
    That old chestnut, (and I'll quote it in full in case anyone doesn't know it)

    "sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me"

    Is a colossal load of bull$@#t.

    Names hurt, they hurt alot, workplace bullying and cyber bullying has caused suicides. Fact.

    Racism is about the vilest face of human behaviour and needs to be stamped out completely.

    I hope justin Sherman is ashamed and sorry and 4 weeks is OK with me.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by Sockeye Salmon View Post
    I can't accept that calling someone names is worse than elbowing someone in the head
    You just don't get it do you?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by Sockeye Salmon View Post
    And here's my mum telling me all those years ' sticks and stones ...'

    The world's gone mad.
    Yeah those were the days!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by BornAScragger View Post
    Racially vilifying somebody — especially a first gamer — is far worse in my opinion than smoking some pot or giving somebody an elbow behind play.
    How do you know it was the first gamer?

    RE the donation can he claim it at tax time?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,716
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sherman banned for vilification

    Quote Originally Posted by G-Mo77 View Post
    Yeah it is but am I alone in thinking 4 weeks is just a tad OTT. Someone who is found to take drugs gets a 3 strike policy and is hidden away so know one will find out but yet if you call someone a name it warrants a harsher penalty that deliberately knocking someone out on the field or shooting up cocaine.

    I'm against racially vilifying someone but thinks it's far to much of a penalty.
    Plus he is paying $5,000 to a charity of Suns choice.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •