Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 201

Thread: Cooney - Gone?

  1. #106
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Desipura View Post
    What if we cop an injury early in the game?
    That goes for any sub. You could what if til the cows come home.

  2. #107
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,984
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Quote Originally Posted by wb_age View Post
    Cooney just tweeted about a retired NBA player making a comeback. Brandon Roy retired due to a degenerative knee problem and having no cartlidge left in his knee.

    Led me to these articles, considering it was he who led me here. I wonder if he or the club are considering the same treatment used by NBA docs.


    Related articles - interesting reads

    http://physiodetective.com/2012/02/2...ed-good-rehab/

    http://metromd.net/brandon-roy-athle...-cell-therapy/


    Cheers
    thanks for posting that, it was an interesting read. Maybe there is light at the end of the tunnel for coons. It would be an amazing sight to see Adam in full flight again.

  3. #108
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    745
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Called it 2 years ago, but surely the time has come..Cooneys gone. No impact as a sub! Would of rathered Gia come on!!

  4. #109
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    9,671
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rance Fan View Post
    Called it 2 years ago, but surely the time has come..Cooneys gone. No impact as a sub! Would of rathered Gia come on!!
    He was pretty poor today, although it was first game back after a long lay off. I'm sure he'll cop a bake from the coaching staff for some of his efforts, but on reflection, hopefully they are prepared to admit they made the wrong call bringing him straight back in and starting him as sub - it wasn't a good move.

  5. #110
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,498
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    I'd have preferred him to start on after such a long lay off. Not a good performance, irrespective of the timing of his TOG.

  6. #111
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kyabram
    Posts
    13,987
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    He should have had a run at Footscray first.
    The curse is dead.

  7. #112
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    'scrazy
    Posts
    4,101
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    When I heard he was named on Thursday night, I thought that he had pushed in front of a couple (Smith & Honeychurch) and reflected that his days as an instant inclusion might be over.
    Officially on the Bus-wagon

  8. #113
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    9,532
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Quote Originally Posted by chef View Post
    He should have had a run at Footscray first.
    This. He's no longer a walk up starter and needs to earn s spot. Smith should have been there tonight and may have avoided a knee injury. I know, its cruel to think of it like that.

  9. #114
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,498
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Disagree. He's good enough and has been playing well enough this year to command it.

    I don't agree with him being sub, as I think it's a bit much after a lay-off but that's just personal preference.

  10. #115
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,864
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Not everyone is as good as Gia at being the sub
    If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.

    Formerly gogriff

  11. #116
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hillside. (carn the sharks)
    Posts
    3,968
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Cooney gone - definitely not.
    Cooney underdone - probably. In hindsight (which is an amazing thing) he should of played through Footscray.

  12. #117
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,474
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    Disagree. He's good enough and has been playing well enough this year to command it.

    I don't agree with him being sub, as I think it's a bit much after a lay-off but that's just personal preference.
    Has he really been that good this year?

    Considering Smith had been in fantastic form in the VFL, and Honeychurch had been good the last two weeks, and Cooney hasn't played for 4-5 weeks, he really shouldn't have come straight back.
    W00F!

  13. #118
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,984
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    To say he had no impact on the game is generous because he had a negative impact. His missed tackle on winderlich was terrible but his effort straight after that of a slow jog was embarrassing. Yeah he was underdone but for me he just does not work anywhere near hard enough defensively and that's why I wasn't thrilled to see his name in the team. Clay Smith no doubt should have been there.

  14. #119
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Quote Originally Posted by anfo27 View Post
    To say he had no impact on the game is generous because he had a negative impact. His missed tackle on winderlich was terrible but his effort straight after that of a slow jog was embarrassing. Yeah he was underdone but for me he just does not work anywhere near hard enough defensively and that's why I wasn't thrilled to see his name in the team. Clay Smith no doubt should have been there.
    Totally agree. Was an awful effort to tackle and chase which resulted in a goal. Was the turning point for me.

  15. #120
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Surf Coast
    Posts
    5,476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney - Gone?

    Gone., I doubt it.
    Underdone, certainly.
    Should he have played in front of others, in hindsight No.
    Should Adam or the selectors cop the flack for his efforts, selectors for mine.
    It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •