Thanks Thanks:  16
Likes Likes:  69
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 97
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,722
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by D Mitchell View Post
    They ae either not being told or don't comply. Plonk me on the big salary and I'll tell you, but almost certainly get it wrong - like all the others.
    We play shallow, force a crowd. From everything I've seen they do that, if you can tell me they're instructed not to do that go ahead.

    I'm not saying I like how we/ they play. I just can't say the forwards aren't doing what they're told.
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,175
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uninformed View Post
    Just to take one issue (without being privy to your entire IP), what would a coach tell his forwards to stop them getting pushed under the ball?
    A simple premise of life.
    If you keep doing the same thing with the expectation of a different result you are insane.

    If they are getting continually pushed under the ball they need to stop engaging the physical push and shove or have someone else coming over the top of the contest.
    Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured

  3. Thanks Uninformed thanked for this post
  4. #63
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    548
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uninformed View Post
    Just to take one issue (without being privy to your entire IP), what would a coach tell his forwards to stop them getting pushed under the ball?
    That, along with being nudged off balance, even getting back into position quickly, aren't really coaching issues, they occur all over the ground. Just to contradict myself, I recall reading an account of one of Chris Grant's coaches, probably Plough, having it drawn to his attention by a radio commentator that Grant was being forced under the ball by a particular defender during a game so instructed Grant to play the defender from behind. I can't be more explicit than that, it's one of the multitude of titbits still in the huge pile of the unsorted, uncatalogued and to be filed of my entire IP

  5. Thanks Uninformed thanked for this post
  6. #64
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    548
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    We play shallow, force a crowd. From everything I've seen they do that, if you can tell me they're instructed not to do that go ahead.

    I'm not saying I like how we/ they play. I just can't say the forwards aren't doing what they're told.
    Fair point if by "shallow" you are referring to the forward press tactic, that might account for 2-3 forwards flying for the high ball in front of goal, one of my criticisms. A forward press works well with players like Clay Smith, Picken, a young McLean, Dunkley, Dickson, even Zaine Cordy in the forward line. The current forward line lacks those sorts. If I've misread you, I'd be interested in what you mean by "shallow".

    PS MJP uses the phrase "wide and shallow" It looks like a reference to he forward pockets.
    Last edited by D Mitchell; 06-01-2024 at 02:07 PM.

  7. #65
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,408
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    Forwards run either where they're told to or where they think the ball is going to go.
    Forwards (mostly) run to space.

    Good forwards run to where their team-mates can kick-it AND where they can score from whether there is space in that area or not. It's hard to teach and it's why players like Lynch and Hogan tend to get shots on goal whether they are in form or out of form. And it's why players like the recent revolving door at Melbourne (Henneman, Schache) will be feast or famine.

    If you run to space it is generally available wide and shallow...hard to hit those targets and hard to kick goals from there.
    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

  8. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    386
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by D Mitchell View Post
    That, along with being nudged off balance, even getting back into position quickly, aren't really coaching issues, they occur all over the ground. Just to contradict myself, I recall reading an account of one of Chris Grant's coaches, probably Plough, having it drawn to his attention by a radio commentator that Grant was being forced under the ball by a particular defender during a game so instructed Grant to play the defender from behind. I can't be more explicit than that, it's one of the multitude of titbits still in the huge pile of the unsorted, uncatalogued and to be filed of my entire IP
    If you don't get the top job, you can always publish the IP! Big sales numbers.

  9. Likes D Mitchell liked this post
  10. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    386
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog Joe View Post
    A simple premise of life.
    If you keep doing the same thing with the expectation of a different result you are insane.

    If they are getting continually pushed under the ball they need to stop engaging the physical push and shove or have someone else coming over the top of the contest.

    To me it appears they are moving quickly to the fall of the ball, but need to stop and prop with enough power to knock the defender off balance. Probably give up a free for blocking though?

  11. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    548
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    ...or maybe they aren't as good as we think they are. In 2016, there was 1 specialist forward, Dickson, hardly a tall marking/monster, in the Grand Final team. The obsession with filling the forward line with with tall, marking forwards is counter productive, arguably a major contribution to the reasons we don't get past the first week of the Finals. What wins now is a team of goers who excel both defensively and offensively, no matter where they play.

  12. Thanks Nuggety Back Pocket thanked for this post
  13. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    386
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by D Mitchell View Post
    ...or maybe they aren't as good as we think they are. In 2016, there was 1 specialist forward, Dickson, hardly a tall marking/monster, in the Grand Final team. The obsession with filling the forward line with with tall, marking forwards is counter productive, arguably a major contribution to the reasons we don't get past the first week of the Finals. What wins now is a team of goers who excel both defensively and offensively, no matter where they play.
    I am hoping super mobile talls with good ground game like Marra and Naughton can do the job.

  14. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    548
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uninformed View Post
    I am hoping super mobile talls with good ground game like Marra and Naughton can do the job.
    Naughton's a couple of years longer in the system than Ugle-Hagan. He shows aggression when the ball is in dispute, neither do nearly enough work when the opposition has control of the ball. I join you in your hope but it hasn't happened yet.

  15. Thanks Uninformed thanked for this post
  16. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,408
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by D Mitchell View Post
    Naughton's a couple of years longer in the system than Ugle-Hagan. He shows aggression when the ball is in dispute, neither do nearly enough work when the opposition has control of the ball. I join you in your hope but it hasn't happened yet.
    Naughton is elite when the oppo have the ball. Strongly disagree.
    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

  17. Likes Happy Days, Mofra, SquirrelGrip liked this post
  18. #72
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    16,274
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    Naughton is elite when the oppo have the ball. Strongly disagree.
    Great DEFENSIVE skills hey MJP

  19. #73
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    548
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    Naughton is elite when the oppo have the ball. Strongly disagree.
    Even more strongly re state my case. When the balls to be won, Naughton's right up there but doesn't apply pressure when it's gone. I recall James Cook, your classic forward who considered his job done once the ball had gone, unusually chasing a defender out, metres back, the defender bounced the ball, it went off at an angle and by the time the defender regathered it, Cook caught up, tackled, goaled from the free. That's what Naughton doesn't do. That said, he's the best of the tall forwards by a mile. What's "shallow" ?

  20. #74
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    62,144
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by D Mitchell View Post
    Naughton's a couple of years longer in the system than Ugle-Hagan. He shows aggression when the ball is in dispute, neither do nearly enough work when the opposition has control of the ball. I join you in your hope but it hasn't happened yet.
    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    Naughton is elite when the oppo have the ball. Strongly disagree.
    To back that up, Naughton sits top 12 in AFL for tackles inside 50 - all the players above him are below 190cm tall.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  21. Likes Mofra, MrMahatma liked this post
  22. #75
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    548
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate the Dogs' attacking firepower?

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    To back that up, Naughton sits top 12 in AFL for tackles inside 50 - all the players above him are below 190cm tall.
    Thanks, BAD. That stat validates Naughton's work when the ball is in dispute. When the ball's clear i e when the opposition have it under control and on the way out is where lies his Achilles heel.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •