Giants V Bulldogs - Round 10, 18/5/24 ENGIE Stadium, Sydney 4:35PM AEST

[1eyedog]

This. It seems our players also enjoy playing on real grounds also.

Under the roof just plain sucks.

Friday will be interesting. We suck at home but Sydney haven't played there this season.

[bornadog]

Friday will be interesting. We suck at home but Sydney haven't played there this season.

Thursday

[angelopetraglia]

Friday will be interesting. We suck at home but Sydney haven't played there this season.

However, they have won their last four games under the roof.

[kruder]

Watching the game last night makes you appreciate a player like Tory Dickson and how important he was in our run in 15/16. We just don't have a player currently on the list that you would want ball in hand in front of the big sticks when the game is online.

[Hotdog60]

Watching the game last night makes you appreciate a player like Tory Dickson and how important he was in our run in 15/16. We just don't have a player currently on the list that you would want ball in hand in front of the big sticks when the game is online.

Out of the whole list our best chance from a set shot would be Dale, Cody and Buku after that it falls away very quickly.
Although if you look at Aaron's performance this year compared to last year he has improved a great deal.

[my plums]

I don't expect anything different from Kane. It was suprising that he didn't find a way to give the Dogs a back hander. He just didn't even mention them at all. Nothing. Zero. The AFL official show that reviews the games so far and all only mentions the Giants have lostttheir mojo.

The Dogs rank outsiders. Everyone wrote them off two weeks ago, especially Kane and his friends. They take a roadtrip, defeat the Premiership favourites from three weeks ago, the second Premiership favourite (joint currently and outright prior to the bounce) and the Dogs get zero credit or even a mention. Incredible really.

I understand that this can happen on a pantomime show like what you would see on Channel 9, but not the official AFL website.

Couldn?t believe it. Actually nothing.

[angelopetraglia]

Coaches Votes

Treloar 10 (5 + 5)
Richards 7 (4 +3 )
Macrae 4 (0 + 4) or (3+1)
Harmes 4 (3 + 1) or (4 + 0)
Naughton 3 (1 + 2)
Hogan 2 (2 + 0)

Treloar is now even with Bont on 36 votes after two perfect 10s in a row.

[angelopetraglia]

See above. 50% chance that Macrae got 4 + 0. Did Bevo give Macrae any votes?

[JanLorMill]

Coaches Votes

Treloar 10 (5 + 5)
Richards 7 (4 +3 )
Macrae 4 (0 + 4) or (3+1)
Harmes 4 (3 + 1) or (4 + 0)
Naughton 3 (1 + 2)
Hogan 2 (2 + 0)

Treloar is now even with Bont on 36 votes after two perfect 10s in a row.

That Hogan 2 vote has to be Kingsley’s vote. We had at least 4 better players

[jazzadogs]

See above. 50% chance that Macrae got 4 + 0. Did Bevo give Macrae any votes?

I don't think he voted for Hogan, so yes he gave Macrae votes. I also think he likes his new toys and will have given Harmes high votes.

Treloar
Harmes
Ed
Naughton
Macrae

[ledge]

That Hogan 2 vote has to be Kingsley’s vote. We had at least 4 better players

Hogan disappeared after half time so I guess he kept them in it for the first half.
They only had two goal kickers as well which would be rare.