PDA

View Full Version : 'Djitti' calls



bornadog
26-04-2012, 02:23 PM
Link (http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/134004/default.aspx)

http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa198/mmsalih/djerrkuraball246.jpg

NATHAN Djerrkura senses an opportunity to finally establish himself as an AFL player in what he regards as his "make or break" season with the Western Bulldogs.

The small forward was among the Bulldogs' best players in their ice-breaking win over Melbourne at the MCG on Sunday.

In the kind of wet conditions he relishes, Djerrkura earned 15 disposals (at 100 per cent efficiency), snapped a crucial goal late in the third quarter and dished off another.

He was also a constant threat to the Demons with his defensive pressure, applying four tackles and implying plenty of others.

It was a decisive step towards ensuring his future at Whitten Oval, which will be the subject of discussion behind closed doors in coming months.

He will be out of contract at the end of the season, and is under no illusions about the difficulty of the challenge before him to remain on the Bulldogs list for 2013 and beyond.

Now in his sixth AFL season, the 23-year-old has played a total of 15 AFL games at two clubs.

In a rare interview, the quietly-spoken Djerrkura conceded he was under pressure to perform, but was positive about his prospects.

Asked if it was accurate to suggest he was facing a make-or-break season, Djerrkura was emphatic.

"That's exactly what it is," he told AFL.com.au.

"I've just got to put my head down and keep trying to improve every aspect of my game.

"I have to do what I can to cement my spot in the side, and do what I can to make the team better.

"And I think I can do that."

Djerrkura also believes he can make a real impact at AFL level, if one of his comments about his childhood hero - former Essendon wingman Michael Long - is to be taken literally.

"I just hope that one day I can come close to what he was," he said.

A Bombers fan in his childhood, Djerrkura has known Long, a fellow Northern Territorian, since his teenage years. He and Hawthorn star Cyril Rioli, a nephew of Long, attended Melbourne's Scotch College together on football scholarships and spent "a few weekends" at Long's house.

"We didn't talk about footy much; it was more about life," he said.

"Longy was close to my dad."

Djerrkura's late father Gatjil was a respected indigenous leader who served as the chairman of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) from 1996-2000.

Almost eight years ago, Djerrkura senior suffered a fatal heart attack at 54.

"I enjoy talking about him," Djerrkura said. "I looked up to him so much, and learnt so much from him about life."

Djerrkura senior's example provided the inspiration for his son and former Geelong teammate Travis Varcoe to establish the Leaders of Tomorrow foundation, which aims to create leaders in remote communities.

"If not for my dad, I don't think I would have done that," he said.

"He was very passionate about helping indigenous people all around Australia, and we want to help people build their dream."

At the time of his father's death, Djerrkura was just 15. The family slowly picked up the pieces and he pursued an AFL career, being drafted by Geelong at pick 25 in the 2006 NAB AFL Draft.

Djerrkura feels he wasn't consistent enough in his four seasons with the Cats. However, he doesn't use the most obvious excuse: that it was a frightfully hard side to break into.

He sought greater opportunities elsewhere and was traded to the Bulldogs at the end of 2010 in exchange for pick 58.

After playing nine games for the Dogs last year and showing glimpses of his capabilities, Djerrkura knows more will be expected of him this season.

With this in mind, he took his commitment to the game and his fitness to a new level in the off-season. Back home in Gove, Arnhem Land, he ran harder and longer in the sand dunes than ever before.

"It's pretty easy to shred skin-folds in 34-degree heat," he said.

He also ate very well - "plenty of fresh seafood".

This dedication propelled Djerrkura to a personal-best pre-season. He finished top-four at the club in endurance, and also broke the bench press record ("110-112 kilos", he thinks) for the Bulldogs' under-80kg class. His effort has since been equalled by Andrew Hooper and Jason Tutt.

After suffering a broken hand in an intra-club practice match and being sidelined for four weeks, Djerrkura was promoted for the Bulldogs' clash with Adelaide at AAMI Stadium.

That night he produced a split-second of genius, which added further credence to his nickname "Djitti" - an Aboriginal word that means "black magic". ("I don't turn around any more when people call me Nathan," he says.)

Late in the first term after the Dogs had conceded the first four goals, Djerrkura gathered the ball under pressure and let fly, off one step, with a spiral punt from outside 50 and the ball bounced truly.

It appeared to be an instinctive act of skill. Some suggested it was a "hit-and-hope" fluke. So what's the truth?

"I'd like to say I did exactly what I tried to do, but that wasn't the case," Djerrkura admitted.

"I just tried to do the team thing by getting the ball forward. I just chucked the ball on the boot and was lucky that it turned out to be a 'torp' and it went through."

Assistant coach Brett Montgomery rated Djerrkura the Dogs' best "pressure player" against the Crows. He was equally good in this area against Melbourne.

"As a small forward, I try to base my game around defensive pressure," Djerrkura said.

"If you look after defence first, everything else comes from that."

Djerrkura was perhaps unlucky to be relegated to substitute in
the heavy loss to St Kilda in round three. However, he has only praise for coach Brendan McCartney, who he worked with at Geelong.

"He's straight-up with everyone, and that's one of the things I like about him," he said.

"He's brought a spark to this club, and I'm sure good things will start happening for us soon."

Go_Dogs
26-04-2012, 07:20 PM
Great article.

He's been pretty good so far this season, so hopefully he continues the upward trend. He could be an important player for us.

Bulldog4life
26-04-2012, 07:27 PM
There's a smack in the eye to all the posters who canned Fantasia for signing Djitti up for 3 seasons.:rolleyes:

Remi Moses
26-04-2012, 07:46 PM
There's a smack in the eye to all the posters who canned Fantasia for signing Djitti up for 3 seasons.:rolleyes:

Signing a guy that the Cats gave away,for three years deserved to be questioned.
Hopefully proves everyone wrong

Go_Dogs
26-04-2012, 08:03 PM
Signing a guy that the Cats gave away,for three years deserved to be questioned.
Hopefully proves everyone wrong

Agreed, but it appears from this article he was only signed for the 2011 and 2012 seasons, so only a 2 year deal.

azabob
26-04-2012, 08:30 PM
There's a smack in the eye to all the posters who canned Fantasia for signing Djitti up for 3 seasons.:rolleyes:

Nice pick up.

Bulldog Revolution
26-04-2012, 10:36 PM
Seems to have taken the next step based on what I've seen so far

LostDoggy
27-04-2012, 08:16 AM
There's a smack in the eye to all the posters who canned Fantasia for signing Djitti up for 3 seasons.:rolleyes:

Yes. Trading for a player that was about to be delisted was excellent work. Giving him 3 instead of 2 makes up for it?

DragzLS1
27-04-2012, 10:27 AM
If he continues on his improvement like we have seen this year (and by all report before he injured himself in the pre season) then we will all be a happy bunch wont we :)

bornadog
27-04-2012, 11:35 AM
Agreed, but it appears from this article he was only signed for the 2011 and 2012 seasons, so only a 2 year deal.

A lot of people on this forum were scathing of the Club about signing him for three, yet appears this is not true.

LostDoggy
27-04-2012, 12:42 PM
Great story, great attitude.

Why are we arguing about his recruiting?

I dont really care how they come on to the list, its what they do when they get there. Everyone deserves a chance and I thought he had his. I had written him off after last year.
It sounds like he has put his head, heart and body into staking his claim this season and I am very impressed with what he has brought to the table, he seems to be improving each week too.

Great effort Djitti. Go hard young man!

Sedat
27-04-2012, 02:09 PM
There's a smack in the eye to all the posters who canned Fantasia for signing Djitti up for 3 seasons.:rolleyes:
One swallow doesn't make 3 summers. We also gave up a 3rd round draft pick that Geelong weren't even going to use for a player they were about to be delisted. It was a dumb trade then, and it's still dumb now.

He was very good last week - hope he continues in that vain moving forward.

Bulldog4life
27-04-2012, 03:08 PM
Agreed, but it appears from this article he was only signed for the 2011 and 2012 seasons, so only a 2 year deal.

Exactly and that was my point. I'm not commenting on whether signing him was a good or bad move or whether he was worth a 3rd round pick. What I am saying is that sometimes on this forum the truth is stretched by certain posters to improve their argument.

Sockeye Salmon
27-04-2012, 03:37 PM
Exactly and that was my point. I'm not commenting on whether signing him was a good or bad move or whether he was worth a 3rd round pick. What I am saying is that sometimes on this forum the truth is stretched by certain posters to improve their argument.

It was fairly widely reported at the time that he got a 3 year deal. It's not as if it was just a figment of some posters imagination.

Bulldog4life
27-04-2012, 03:53 PM
It was fairly widely reported at the time that he got a 3 year deal. It's not as if it was just a figment of some posters imagination.

Was it? It was widely reported on WOOF I give you that.

AndrewP6
27-04-2012, 07:12 PM
It was fairly widely reported at the time that he got a 3 year deal. It's not as if it was just a figment of some posters imagination.


Was it? It was widely reported on WOOF I give you that.

I've not been able to find any confirmation of a three year deal on any site other than here.

Go_Dogs
27-04-2012, 07:34 PM
Was it? It was widely reported on WOOF I give you that.

You're right, it's one that we at WOOF got wrong. Unfortunately we all make mistakes, and given the club doesn't publicly disclose many details about contracts it is often difficult to get solid verification.

2 years rather than 3 is certainly a more prudent list management decision, however we still got dudded on the trade by giving up a 3rd round selection Geelong only used to elevate a rookie - we could have done with another, earlier selection. If Geelong were only elevating a rookie, any pick what have been sufficient.

Ghost Dog
27-04-2012, 08:09 PM
You're right, it's one that we at WOOF got wrong. Unfortunately we all make mistakes, and given the club doesn't publicly disclose many details about contracts it is often difficult to get solid verification.

2 years rather than 3 is certainly a more prudent list management decision, however we still got dudded on the trade by giving up a 3rd round selection Geelong only used to elevate a rookie - we could have done with another, earlier selection. If Geelong were only elevating a rookie, any pick what have been sufficient.

So we payed overs, when a lower than 3rd round pick would have been fine. Correct?

Go_Dogs
27-04-2012, 08:15 PM
So we payed overs, when a lower than 3rd round pick would have been fine. Correct?

Yes. Geelong could have used any pick to upgrade Pods - so it appears we got bullied into giving up more than we should have.

ledge
27-04-2012, 08:27 PM
Yes. Geelong could have used any pick to upgrade Pods - so it appears we got bullied into giving up more than we should have.

Hindsight is sometimes not a good thing

jeemak
27-04-2012, 08:49 PM
Yes. Geelong could have used any pick to upgrade Pods - so it appears we got bullied into giving up more than we should have.

Who's to say that Geelong didn't have their eye on a player and thought they'd need our third rounder to get them? Then when draft day came along, that player was gone at pick 58 so instead they upgraded Pods with that pick and finished up for the day?

chef
27-04-2012, 08:59 PM
Who's to say that Geelong didn't have their eye on a player and thought they'd need our third rounder to get them? Then when draft day came along, that player was gone at pick 58 so instead they upgraded Pods with that pick and finished up for the day?

They may have needed it in trade week, but after getting it their deal fell through. No one knows for sure.

Go_Dogs
27-04-2012, 09:03 PM
Who's to say that Geelong didn't have their eye on a player and thought they'd need our third rounder to get them? Then when draft day came along, that player was gone at pick 58 so instead they upgraded Pods with that pick and finished up for the day?

Certainly possible (although I'm unsure if they would've had the list space to still upgrade Pods if they'd selected someone else at 58?). I guess it's the end result of them using it to upgrade that's frustrating.

GVGjr
27-04-2012, 09:18 PM
A lot of people on this forum were scathing of the Club about signing him for three, yet appears this is not true.

Was that information shared by the coach?

bornadog
27-04-2012, 09:34 PM
Was that information shared by the coach?

Don't know.

Mantis
27-04-2012, 09:40 PM
I was told by someone who should know that he was signed for 3 years.

The story goes that it was in our best interests financially to sign him for 3 than 2 so we went that way... not sure if there was an option clause at the end of the 2nd year though.

Sockeye Salmon
28-04-2012, 12:37 AM
Who's to say that Geelong didn't have their eye on a player and thought they'd need our third rounder to get them? Then when draft day came along, that player was gone at pick 58 so instead they upgraded Pods with that pick and finished up for the day?

Maybe during trade week but draft day they didn't have list space to draft another player

jeemak
28-04-2012, 01:48 AM
Maybe during trade week but draft day they didn't have list space to draft another player

Fair enough, if that's the case. I was confused about when final list lodgements had to be made, I suppose it makes sense that it would be prior to the national draft rather than the preseason draft, to ensure each delisted player gets equal chance to get back on a senior or rookie list.

The point of my post was to highlight that there might have been a reason for offering pick 58 for him, other than general incompetence from Fantasia. We clearly wanted him on our list, and considering many on this board have been proven incorrect when it came to his contracted tenure at the club I figured there might be a chance the same might apply to the circumstances around the compensation provided to Geelong for his services.

Sedat
28-04-2012, 02:01 AM
The point of my post was to highlight that there might have been a reason for offering pick 58 for himI liken this situation to Tim Callan, where we only gave up a pick downgrade (from 61 to 63 from memory) to get Callan to the club. We got a speculative player and we got to keep a sllightly worse pick. Geelong are very reasonable players during trade week (eg: Steven King, Charlie Gardiner, Tim Callan) so we should have easily been able to negotiate something similar for DJ and kept a slightly worse 3rd round pick, especally considering he was about to get delisted. DJ is very much a speculative trade and on the back of 3 games in 3 years at Geelong, giving up a 3rd round draft pick for him was well over the odds (especially considering he was about to get delisted) - it meant that our first 'live' pick in that draft was 70 odd.

Anyway good luck to DJ. I'm not sold yet but Sunday's effort was encouraging. He still fumbles far too many ground balls for my liking, an area that really should be a strength for someone as agile and low to the ground as he is.

jeemak
28-04-2012, 02:25 AM
Agree on his ball handling skills, and agree that he still has a long way to go with respect to earning an extension on his contract.

Your point about the Cats being reasonable traders is fair enough, though I still don't think it accounts for either the Bulldogs having to offer a pick that was better than that potentially offered to them to secure his services, or them requiring that pick to use in another trade.

Sockeye Salmon
28-04-2012, 08:28 AM
Agree on his ball handling skills, and agree that he still has a long way to go with respect to earning an extension on his contract.

Your point about the Cats being reasonable traders is fair enough, though I still don't think it accounts for either the Bulldogs having to offer a pick that was better than that potentially offered to them to secure his services, or them requiring that pick to use in another trade.

Had we kept that pick we would have used it on Schofield anyway

Go_Dogs
28-04-2012, 09:35 AM
Had we kept that pick we would have used it on Schofield anyway

So it's a moot point anyway, but geez, we stuffed it up on all fronts. Could have selected Puopolo (we were touted as being interested) or Duigan (who doesn't appear to have been on our radar but would fill a role) with 58. Instead we ended up with Schofield who, although looking a promising player, left after one year, and Geelong, Hawthorn and Carlton are all benefactors in one way or another.

ledge
28-04-2012, 10:34 AM
So it's a moot point anyway, but geez, we stuffed it up on all fronts. Could have selected Puopolo (we were touted as being interested) or Duigan (who doesn't appear to have been on our radar but would fill a role) with 58. Instead we ended up with Schofield who, although looking a promising player, left after one year, and Geelong, Hawthorn and Carlton are all benefactors in one way or another.

Dont think you can call that a club stuff up at all, he looked like he had the potential to be up to their standards at least.
Whatever happened wasnt foreseen by him or the club a few months before.
Just bad luck.

LostDoggy
28-04-2012, 11:07 AM
Dont think you can call that a club stuff up at all, he looked like he had the potential to be up to their standards at least.
Whatever happened wasnt foreseen by him or the club a few months before.
Just bad luck.

Yes trading out a good pick for a player you can get later in the draft isn't a mistake. Lose a draft pick and keep plodders like Mulligan and Hooper on the list.