PDA

View Full Version : Our Other Players Not Named Jake Stringer



bulldogtragic
16-10-2017, 09:19 PM
So tonight, The Age reporting multiple interest in trading for Jong, who is contracted.

Articles last week:

- Honeychurch wants a fresh start. GWS interested, late trade or DFA.
- Campbell looking for a fresh start. Club allowing him to look despite a contract.
- Crameri looking around. Prepared to play interstate.


Might be a few minor trades, or steak knives in the next few days.

josie
16-10-2017, 09:34 PM
I know Jong is not Bonti however he is quick, can take a decent mark, continues to be on improve and is a good team player. Our midfield is a bit one paced and think unless we have another speedster in our sights i do not think entertaining Jong trade is necessarily a good idea. If he were to move guessing it would need to be another vic club and a very good offer for Jong and club.

BulldogBelle
16-10-2017, 09:42 PM
I agree. It would have to be an insane offer to even consider imo. I know he has limitations, eg disposal, but he seems a fabric type player.
Yes he shopped himself around, but he's not the first player to do that, nor fall for the charms of a smooth talking
club showing interest in him when he was battling to hold/demand a senior team spot.
There'd been enough of an unsettled type atmosphere over our list since the great 2016 day. Lets not make more. He didn't play that day but he sure as hell had an input that season, in more than one way.

Rocket Science
16-10-2017, 09:50 PM
I'd love to see Jongy get a proper run at it, particularly given the endeavour, versatility and depth he lends us.

But if he ended up being steak knives in a deal for Schache I'd wish him all the best.

The Bulldogs Bite
16-10-2017, 11:19 PM
Jong has his faults but his improvement has been solid each year prior to his injury.

Think he could be important for us. I want to keep him.

ratsmac
17-10-2017, 12:02 AM
I wonder what offers might come for Jong though. Every player is tradable....well maybe not the Bont.

bornadog
17-10-2017, 12:04 AM
Jong has his faults but his improvement has been solid each year prior to his injury.

Think he could be important for us. I want to keep him.
He is hard to rate as he has lots of attributes. Decision making starting to improve just needs to get more of the ball for a mid.

lemmon
17-10-2017, 12:25 AM
Playing devil's advocate, Jong's also coming off an ACL and his best attribute is his athleticism and explosiveness. If a second rounder was put forward, I think it'd be worth considering.

ledge
17-10-2017, 12:47 AM
Jong wouldn't be on much either I imagine, wouldn't get many players as good as him as hungry as him and as team orientated as him for the value.
I wouldn't be trading him at all.

boydogs
17-10-2017, 01:07 AM
We need a Jong type in the side, doesn't have to be Jong himself but that strong bull with explosive speed is critical

Mofra
17-10-2017, 10:16 AM
Forget Jong - I'd be using Crameri as a sweetener to Brisbane. They have a bunch of young talls so he won't hurt their age profile, he's said he's willing to move interstate (unlike Jong who turned down a bigger offer from GCS to stay at the Bulldogs) and we're clearly after Schache so need the currency and the list space.

Campbell can go where he likes as a goodwill trade. Bevo clearly doesn't rate him and he won't attract much at the table.

Happy Days
17-10-2017, 10:46 AM
It'd be pretty harsh trading him on only 12 months after convincing him to re-sign on a considerably lesser contract than was being offered.

Of course, I think any player is available for the right price, but I'd want more than a second given he's contracted (not that we understand how to use leverage or what it is/means).

bulldogtragic
18-10-2017, 09:51 AM
Tom Campbells manager saying most likely he will be staying.

The Bulldogs Bite
18-10-2017, 10:25 AM
Tom Campbells manager saying most likely he will be staying.

Surely for his own career he is better off moving elsewhere.

always right
18-10-2017, 10:45 AM
Jong might very well be the only player on our list who has improved every year he has played.

Rocket Science
18-10-2017, 11:06 AM
Surely for his own career he is better off moving elsewhere.

I suspect that's code for zero currency.

bulldogtragic
19-10-2017, 12:23 PM
Honeychurch's manager just turned up.

bulldogsthru&thru
19-10-2017, 12:39 PM
Honeychurch's manager just turned up.

to be delisted i think

bulldogtragic
19-10-2017, 12:41 PM
to be delisted i think

GWS have said they're interest. They have 27, we have 28. Maybe trade for that one pick upgrade, if we can get it.

jazzadogs
19-10-2017, 12:42 PM
to be delisted i think

Nick Bowen from AFL Media tweeting that Honeychurch won't be traded because GWS aren't offering anything we want...will be delisted and picked up as a delisted free agent by GWS.

bornadog
19-10-2017, 03:58 PM
What happens to Crameri?

bulldogtragic
19-10-2017, 04:14 PM
What happens to Crameri?

Delisted.