How far was Hill's mark out of bounds on the full?

[bulldogtragic]

From where i was sitting it looked at least a foot over. But i was on the otherside of the ground, although in a straight line.

[Remi Moses]

About the third row,which was 10 rows lower than the Leon Davis mark

[Throughandthrough]

About the third row,which was 10 rows lower than the Leon Davis mark




Boooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


























I was gonna say that!

[LostDoggy]

When i watched the replay at home, i thought it was 50/50.

Didn't look like a clear cut out of bounds, in my opinion.

[Mofra]

The whole ball has to be over the line remember ;)

[Topdog]

looked very line ball. Thought it was out when I was watching but a little bit may have been on the line.

[LostDoggy]

This was just up from where I sit - the Leon Davis one was way way out - this one, umm, very line ball, but I would have to err on the side of......it was in;)

[aistobas]

Had a good view of it. IMO, out. But the ump wasn't in good position so he deserved the benefit of the doubt.

[Bulldog Joe]

Certainly more in than the Davis one by a long way. Liked the way he have it off for the goal.

[mighty_west]

The ball was so far out, i could have sworn i saw a yellow footy ordering some Nando's!

[AndrewP6]

Might've been out, but after that absurd "mark" paid to Neon Leon a while back (a mark taken from the middle of the queue at the snack bar), I'd call it in.

[LostDoggy]

Well the umpiring in the first half was clearly in Geelongs favor. Umps just balancing it out by giving us the benefit of the doubt in 50/50 situations. Even in 60/40 situations sometimes ;)