PDA

View Full Version : Woof Player Awards Rnd 10 - Western Bulldogs vs Essendon



BulldogBelle
28-05-2010, 04:09 PM
R10 - Western Bulldogs vs Essendon

There are two awards that you can vote on, once the game is completed.

Voting closes each Tuesday at 8.00pm.

The first one is for the Joe Marmo Medal for the best players on the ground.

There are 4 votes allocated and it's a 4 for the best and of course 3, 2 and 1.

and

The second award is for the Ron James Medal for the best 2 pups on the ground.

2 Votes allocated - 2 being for the best pup and 1 for the runner-up
Remember the cut off age for a pup is 22 as at the 1st of January, 2010.

Pups available for selection -

Jarrod Boumann, Ayce Cordy, Jamason Daniels, Andrejs Everitt, Jarrad Grant, Jarrod Harbrow, Shaun Higgins, Josh Hill, Andrew Hooper, Christian Howard, Liam Jones, James Mulligan, Matthew Panos, Eddie Prato, Sam J Reid, Jordan Roughead, Brennan Stack, Jason Tutt, Callan Ward, Easton Wood.

Need to know more - History of WOOF Awards and Voting Rules (http://www.woof.net.au/forum/showthread.php?t=7099)

chef
28-05-2010, 11:58 PM
4. Hudson
3. Griffen
2. Hall
1. Morris

Hotdog60
29-05-2010, 12:06 AM
4: Hudson
3: Picken
2: Grant
1: Addison

Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
29-05-2010, 12:12 AM
Marmo

4. Hudson
3. Griffen
2. Picken
1. Lake

James

2. Grant
1. Harbrow

Beast
29-05-2010, 12:14 AM
4. Picken
3. Griffen
2. Hudson
1. Hall

2. Grant
1. Hill

LostDoggy
29-05-2010, 12:15 AM
4. Hudson
3. Hall
2. Griffen
1. Lake

2. Grant
1. Hill

The Coon Dog
29-05-2010, 12:17 AM
1: Hudson
2: Picken
3: Addison
4: Grant

On the radio they said he only had 4 possessions for the night.

4 - Ben Hudson
3 - Ryan Griffen
2 - Barry Hall
1 - Lindsay Gilbee

Mantis
29-05-2010, 12:19 AM
On the radio they said he only had 4 possessions for the night.



Yep.

4 kicks, 3 marks, 0 handballs.

Very poor performance.

Ozza
29-05-2010, 12:24 AM
Yep.

4 kicks, 3 marks, 0 handballs.

Very poor performance.

Agree. Was appalling.

4. Hudson
3. Picken
2. Hall
1. Griffen

Hotdog60
29-05-2010, 12:25 AM
On the radio they said he only had 4 possessions for the night.



That maybe so, but how many did his opponent get?

To be honest, I was stumped trying to pick anyone past the first two.

Mantis
29-05-2010, 12:28 AM
That maybe so, but how many did his opponent get?



Who was he playing on?

Hotdog60
29-05-2010, 12:32 AM
Who was he playing on?

You could say that for most of the side tonight, but as I said it was a token pick as there wasn't much else after the first two. Maybe I should have put Grant at 3.:o

Ozza
29-05-2010, 12:35 AM
Who was he playing on?

He spent periods on Zaharakis and Monfries.

KT31
29-05-2010, 12:36 AM
Marmo
4 - Hudson
3 - Hall
2 - Griffen
1 - Gilbee

James
Grant
Hill

lemmon
29-05-2010, 12:37 AM
4-Hudson
3-Picken
2-Hall
1-Griffen

2-Grant
1-Hill

Mantis
29-05-2010, 12:38 AM
4. Hudson
3. Lake
2. Griffen
1. Hall

Popcorn Chicken
29-05-2010, 12:50 AM
4 Griffen
3 Hall
2 Hudson
1 Grant

3 Grant ( best young player by a mile deserves max votes)

G-Mo77
29-05-2010, 01:32 AM
4. Hudson (He is arguably our most important player)
3. Picken
2. Lake
1. Griffen

2. Grant
1. Hill

The Bulldogs Bite
29-05-2010, 01:35 AM
4. Hudson
3. Griffen
2. Grant
1. Picken

2. Grant
1. Hill

jazzadogs
29-05-2010, 01:40 AM
4 Hudson - what a champ. Having a great year.
3 Hall (dropped a few, but we can't expect much more than 5 goals. Should be other options)
2 Griffen
1 Picken

2 Grant
1 Hill

bulldogsman
29-05-2010, 01:41 AM
4. Hudson
3. Griffen
2. Picken
1. Hall

2. Grant
1. Hill

AndrewP6
29-05-2010, 01:46 AM
4 Hall - someone who stood up, and had a crack. Despite Rocket saying otherwise, we need his goalkicking. And he delivered
3 - Huddo- Took some nice grabs, strong work.
2 - Picken - had a go.
1 - Grant - presented OK, a few good grabs. Shows something.

Jeez that was hard work.

Flamethrower
29-05-2010, 01:54 AM
4 - Ben Hudson
3 - Ryan Griffen
2 - Barry Hall
1 - Liam Picken

2 - Jarrad Grant
1 - Jarrod Harbrow

Sedat
29-05-2010, 02:09 AM
Marmo:

4 - Hudson
3 - Cross
2 - Lake
1 - Griffen

James:

2 - Grant
1 - Harbrow

BulldogBelle
29-05-2010, 07:23 AM
4-Hudson
3-Picken
2-Hall
1-Griffen

2-Hill
1-Grant

BulldogBelle
29-05-2010, 08:25 AM
4 Hudson
3 Lake
2 Griffen
1 Hall

LostDoggy
29-05-2010, 10:58 AM
4 Hudson
3 Lake
2 Picken
1 Hall

2 Grant
1 Harbrow

Happy Days
29-05-2010, 11:03 AM
4. Hudson
3. Griffen
2. Lake
1. Hall

2. Grant
1. Hill

Go_Dogs
29-05-2010, 11:17 AM
4. Hudson
3. Picken
2. Griffen
1. Hall

2. Grant
1. Hill

Rocco Jones
29-05-2010, 11:20 AM
4- Hudson
3- Lake
2- Griffen
1- Cooney

I know Cooney's efficiency was 50% and that he butchered the ball a lot but I thought his grunt work in the clearances especially was great. 5 tackles, 9 clearances (game high) and 11 contested disposals.

Cooney has been a quality player for awhile but I feel that he is a different player this year. He has added out and out grunt to his game. Just love the guy at the moment.

Go_Dogs
29-05-2010, 11:22 AM
I know Cooney's efficiency was 50% and that he butchered the ball a lot but I thought his grunt work in the clearances especially was great. 5 tackles, 9 clearances (game high) and 11 contested disposals.

Cooney has been a quality player for awhile but I feel that he is a different player this year. He has added out and out grunt to his game. Just love the guy at the moment.

I tend to agree. Couldn't fit him in my votes this week, because he didn't finish off his good work, but is certainly coming into very good form and looking super sharp and powerful.

Scorlibo
29-05-2010, 01:05 PM
4- Hudson
3- Lake
2- Griffen
1- Cooney

I know Cooney's efficiency was 50% and that he butchered the ball a lot but I thought his grunt work in the clearances especially was great. 5 tackles, 9 clearances (game high) and 11 contested disposals.

Cooney has been a quality player for awhile but I feel that he is a different player this year. He has added out and out grunt to his game. Just love the guy at the moment.

Absolutely agree Rocco, thought Cooney was good last night despite his few shanks and his contested game has indeed got to the point of being one of the best in the competition.

4 - Hudson - loves a challenge.
3 - Griffen - won just about every ball that came his way and then carried the ball with intent on top of that.
2 - Cooney - dynamic as ever.
1 - Lake - patrolled the defensive fifty well.

I refuse to give Barry Hall votes because he kicked 5 goals, the amount of sitters he dropped was appalling, he has to know that when he demands the ball like that and then doesn't mark it, it will just be whisked away by the opposition.

2 - Grant
1 - Harbrow

AndrewP6
29-05-2010, 01:17 PM
Absolutely agree Rocco, thought Cooney was good last night despite his few shanks and his contested game has indeed got to the point of being one of the best in the competition.

4 - Hudson - loves a challenge.
3 - Griffen - won just about every ball that came his way and then carried the ball with intent on top of that.
2 - Cooney - dynamic as ever.
1 - Lake - patrolled the defensive fifty well.

I refuse to give Barry Hall votes because he kicked 5 goals, the amount of sitters he dropped was appalling, he has to know that when he demands the ball like that and then doesn't mark it, it will just be whisked away by the opposition.

2 - Grant
1 - Harbrow

I didn't give Cooney votes based on the fact that his grunt work was marred by his terrible disposal, winning the ball and then giving it back. At least Hall put it through the big sticks.

Sedat
29-05-2010, 01:33 PM
I know Cooney's efficiency was 50% and that he butchered the ball a lot but I thought his grunt work in the clearances especially was great. 5 tackles, 9 clearances (game high) and 11 contested disposals.

Cooney has been a quality player for awhile but I feel that he is a different player this year. He has added out and out grunt to his game. Just love the guy at the moment.
It might be unfair but Coons is such a special player that his papers are marked harder than most. His inside 50 delivery on several occasions in the 3rd qtr, under no pressure whatsoever, was a contributing factor in our loss, and for that reason alone I just couldn't fit him in the votes. Agree that his clearance work and his workrate in the clinches was exceptional.

Scorlibo
29-05-2010, 01:46 PM
I didn't give Cooney votes based on the fact that his grunt work was marred by his terrible disposal, winning the ball and then giving it back. At least Hall put it through the big sticks.

Cooney got the ball moving in the right direction despite his errors, Hall's errors resulted in instant possession for them. That was the difference between the two.

Rocco Jones
29-05-2010, 03:02 PM
It might be unfair but Coons is such a special player that his papers are marked harder than most. His inside 50 delivery on several occasions in the 3rd qtr, under no pressure whatsoever, was a contributing factor in our loss, and for that reason alone I just couldn't fit him in the votes. Agree that his clearance work and his workrate in the clinches was exceptional.

Definitely agree with most of that.

I think a lot of posters judge players relative to their usual standard when voting which I try not to do.

I do also agree that he butchered the ball during the 3rd quarter but I am of the view that it's better to be up and about and butchering it a lot than just being a passenger for long periods during the game. If a player wins his own ball I am much more tolerate to them butchering it. Overall I think his exceptional work at the stoppages/in tight made up for the stuff ups that came from opportunities gained from his hard work anyway. I had him as 4th best of an ordinary lot to be honest. It was between him and Hall and I think Barry's 5 goals were pretty easy, he was a big focus during the night and Fletch burned him going the other way. Still a good game from Hall.

boydogs
29-05-2010, 03:56 PM
Marmo

4 - Ben Hudson
3 - Barry Hall
2 - Brian Lake
1 - Adam Cooney

James

2 - Josh Hill
1 - Jarrad Grant

Doc26
29-05-2010, 04:04 PM
4. Hudson
3. Lake
2. Griffen
1. Picken

Apologies to Cooney and Hall

2. Grant
1. Hill

LostDoggy
29-05-2010, 05:45 PM
4. Hudson
-----

3. Picken
2. Griffen
1. Cooney

bornadog
29-05-2010, 06:19 PM
4-Griffen
3-Picken
2-Lake
1-Hall

2-Hill
1-Grant


Hudson good in the first half but faded.

LostDoggy
29-05-2010, 06:51 PM
4. Hudson
3.Picken ( Higgins see how he puts in )
2.Griffen
1. Lake


2. Nobody
1. Nobody

The Underdog
29-05-2010, 07:59 PM
4. Hudson
3. Griffen
2. Lake
1. Cross

2. Grant
1. Hill, I guess

BulldogBelle
29-05-2010, 08:22 PM
Marmo
4- Hudson
3- Griffen
2- Lake
1- Hall

James
2- Grant
1- Hill

AndrewP6
29-05-2010, 09:21 PM
Cooney got the ball moving in the right direction despite his errors, Hall's errors resulted in instant possession for them. That was the difference between the two.

Hall's good work put points on the board. But fair enough... agree to disagree.

Lurgan
29-05-2010, 10:54 PM
4. Griffen
3. Hudson
2. Cooney
1. Cross


2. Grant
1. Hill

Bulldog Revolution
30-05-2010, 11:08 AM
4. Hudson
3. Griffen
2. Picken
1. Lake

2. Grant
1. Hill

Greystache
30-05-2010, 02:37 PM
4. Hudson
3. Picken
2. Griffen
1. Hall

2. Grant
1. Hill

LongWait
30-05-2010, 03:22 PM
4. Hudson
3. Picken
2. Hall
1. Grant

2. Grant
1. Harbrow

BulldogBelle
30-05-2010, 07:49 PM
4 Hudson
3 Hall
2 Picken
1 Lake


2 Grant
1 Hill

Bumper Bulldogs
30-05-2010, 11:39 PM
4 - Hudson
3 - Hall
2 - Picken
1 - Griffen

2 - Grant - O hope he gets a few games at CHF to get the feel.
1 - Hill

LostDoggy
31-05-2010, 12:31 AM
4. Ryan Griffen
3. Ben Hudson
2. Liam Picken
1. Brian Lake

2. Jarrad Grant
1. Josh Hill

dadsgirl16
31-05-2010, 09:08 AM
4.Hudson
3.Griffen
2.Picken
1.Hall

2.Grant
1.Hill

LostDoggy
31-05-2010, 08:31 PM
4. Huddo
3. Hall
2. Grant
1. Picken

2. Grant
1. Hill

BulldogBelle
01-06-2010, 09:21 PM
Voting is now closed.