PDA

View Full Version : Dogs angry at lack of recognition for young gun Jarrad Grant



The Coon Dog
14-07-2010, 08:46 AM
Jon Ralph - Herald Sun - 14 July

THE Western Bulldogs have called for the AFL to explain its criteria for Rising Star nominations after forward Jarrad Grant was again overlooked yesterday.

Grant has played 11 games of increasing quality this season, but continues to be ignored by the AFL's selection panel.

Brisbane's 19-year-old midfielder Jack Redden became the third Lion nominated this season, despite his club losing 10 of its past 11 games.

Article in full... (http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/dogs-angry-at-lack-of-recognition-for-young-gun-jarrad-grant/story-e6frf9jf-1225891358372)

LostDoggy
14-07-2010, 09:01 AM
With all the Magic our "MERLIN" shows, he deserves a nomination, even tho he's ineligible.

He does look like Merlin doesn'r he

LostDoggy
14-07-2010, 10:00 AM
It will be interesting to see the AFL's response, so that we can all try and come to terms with the criteria, whatever it may be????:confused:

Sedat
14-07-2010, 11:44 AM
Don't particularly like seeing these sort of comments coming from the club - it just sounded like a whinge for no apparent reason other than he hasn't received a nomination as yet. Grant has been terrific but after a 12 possession effort he was always going to struggle to get a nomination this week. So he was a bit stiff to miss out on one when Melksham got his after a 14 possession effort, big deal. If he continues to perform well he will get a nomination before the season is out, just like Callan Ward did late last season after missing out to Aaron Joseph following a 33 possession effort against Port up in Darwin earlier in the season.

mjp
14-07-2010, 01:05 PM
Don't particularly like seeing these sort of comments coming from the club - it just sounded like a whinge for no apparent reason other than he hasn't received a nomination as yet.

Agree. I guess it is good for the sponsors when he gets a nomination so I understand it from a marketing perspective, but beyond that who cares?

Speaking of sponsors, has anyone heard news of discussions with Mission foods re- an extension beyond 2011? Pretty sure they signed a 3-year deal which is more than half way done.

Topdog
14-07-2010, 01:06 PM
I don't love the comment but the guy has been consistently good for 10 weeks. The AFL say they reward consistency so it will be interesting to hear their response.

LostDoggy
14-07-2010, 02:29 PM
You watch Grant will get the votes this week even if he doesnt play...

jazzadogs
14-07-2010, 03:42 PM
From what is said about the Rising Star, a lot of this kind of stuff is said behind closed doors to encourage the nominations of certain players/players from certain teams.

I can understand why they are frustrated, but I would hope Grant isn't too phased. He knows he's playing well, the team's happy with him. If he gets a nom, bonus, but if he doesn't what does it really matter?

bornadog
14-07-2010, 05:40 PM
Same thing happend with Callen Ward and finally he got a nomination. I agree with fantasia that the criteria is bemusing.

chef
14-07-2010, 06:00 PM
I couldn't care less if he doesn't receive a nomination(he can't win it anyway), the kid is going to be a gun and that's all that matters:)

Ghost Dog
14-07-2010, 06:44 PM
There has been in the past, a definite media bias against the dogs.
Maybe this is what the club is annoyed about.

LostDoggy
14-07-2010, 07:04 PM
I couldn't care less if he doesn't receive a nomination(he can't win it anyway), the kid is going to be a gun and that's all that matters:)

Yep, have to agree with this!

AndrewP6
14-07-2010, 10:14 PM
He's done pretty well thus far, but in all honesty, I couldn't give a fat rat's you-know-what about this 'issue' the club has raised. Just sounds like they're having a whinge. Forget the individual stuff and let's get the TEAM back up and running.

Desipura
15-07-2010, 09:33 AM
he's done pretty well thus far, but in all honesty, i couldn't give a fat rat's you-know-what about this 'issue' the club has raised. Just sounds like they're having a whinge. Forget the individual stuff and let's get the team back up and running.

this^^^^^^^^

Mofra
15-07-2010, 02:54 PM
Don't particularly like seeing these sort of comments coming from the club - it just sounded like a whinge for no apparent reason other than he hasn't received a nomination as yet.
Doesn't the junior club get a package of training equipment for every nomination?

Wouldn't surprise if Grant's junior club had mentioned something to the Bulldogs, and the Doggies picked a slow news day to get a bit of profile going.

Doc26
15-07-2010, 11:51 PM
I don't love the comment but the guy has been consistently good for 10 weeks. The AFL say they reward consistency so it will be interesting to hear their response.

Gysberts after two games won his nomination, played one further game and has yet to return albeit with a back complaint.

With Barry out this week is a great opportunity for Jarrad to put in a big performance and force the AFL's hand to nominate him for those into this kind of thing which I'm not.

We all see the value he adds to our forward line and his rapid rise this season.
For mine his progression is the season's best Bulldog story 'to date'.

chef
16-07-2010, 07:35 AM
Gysberts after two games won his nomination, played one further game and has yet to return albeit with a back complaint.

With Barry out this week is a great opportunity for Jarrad to put in a big performance and force the AFL's hand to nominate him for those into this kind of thing which I'm not.

We all see the value he adds to our forward line and his rapid rise this season.
For mine his progression is the season's best Bulldog story 'to date'.

They were two very good games but(26 possessions against Geelong and 27 possessions against Carlton).

noose bullies
20-07-2010, 09:05 PM
Jarrad grant is going to be a superstar in the making

AndrewP6
20-07-2010, 09:14 PM
Jarrad grant is going to be a superstar in the making

Methinks you mean is a superstar in the making.