PDA

View Full Version : Instant charmer: Hall has power to help Giants leap into action



LostDoggy
23-12-2010, 01:02 AM
Michael Cowley
December 23, 2010

GREATER Western Sydney stunned many Swans fans last year by signing the club's former inspirational skipper Paul Kelly to their staff - now they are considering chasing Sydney's 2005 premiership captain, Barry Hall, for their inaugural season in the AFL.

Hall is contracted to the Western Bulldogs for next year, and when he signed the two-year deal at the end of 2009, even he thought that would be the end of his colourful football career. But after finishing second in the Coleman Medal, booting 80 goals and leading the Dogs past the Swans in their semi-final this year, Hall, despite turning 35 in early 2012, has shown he could have another season at the top level in him.

The drawback is his age, which doesn't fit the profile of players the Giants are said to be targeting. But one major factor in his favour is his high profile in Sydney, a point conceded by GWS chief executive Dale Holmes.
Advertisement: Story continues below

Unlike many superstars in the game, Hall is instantly recognisable in Sydney to both AFL and non-AFL supporters. He spent eight seasons in Sydney and captained the Swans to a drought-breaking premiership victory in 2005. He also infamously saturated news bulletins in 2008 with his left hook to West Coast's Brent Staker.

Only a few of the game's current elite - including Gary Ablett, Chris Judd, Buddy Franklin and Adam Goodes - would be a chance to be immediately recognised on a Sydney street. Hall belongs in that category and given the Giants paid about $4 million to punt on Israel Folau's athletic ability and marketability, Hall could be a bargain.

''As always we are just not going to comment specifically around uncontracted players,'' Holmes said when asked if the Giants were interested in Hall. ''We've got Graeme Allen and Stephen Silvagni, who head up our list construction, working on the types of players we want to look at from an uncontracted point of view.''

But Holmes agreed Hall's profile in Sydney could make him more attractive to the club. ''There is no doubt that Barry's profile in this market is as big as anyone who has been involved in the game up here,'' Holmes said. ''That's a bonus, but essentially what's paramount in the consideration is how does that complement your list construction strategy.''

Because of that profile, Hall could also be an asset to the club post-football in a variety of coaching and marketing roles, and both the Swans and Bulldogs have noted how well he works with their younger players.

While they have secured Folau, the Giants have missed out on another target, West Coast's Nic Naitanui, who recently re-signed with the Eagles. But several talented players who come off contract at the end of next year have reportedly been targeted.

Collingwood's Dane Swan and Scott Pendlebury are on the radar, but the Pies are confident of retaining both. Carlton's Marc Murphy is apparently another, but the Blues say he won't be going anywhere. Others touted as potential Giants are Geelong pair Joel Selwood and Jimmy Bartel and Brisbane youngster Daniel Rich.

But even if the club decides to go after Hall, loyalty to the Bulldogs - who gave him a second chance and signed him after he re-signed from the Swans midway through 2009 - could be the major obstacle to any prospective deal. ''Barry is signed for 2011 with the Western Bulldogs, and he isn't looking beyond next season,'' Hall's manager Phil Mullen said.

''The Dogs have been very good to Hally and he's very happy there, and I would imagine if it got to the point where he is considering going around for another season in 2012, I couldn't see him playing anywhere else if the Bulldogs still wanted him.''

Link (http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/instant-charmer-hall-has-power-to-help-giants-leap-into-action-20101222-195lv.html)

AndrewP6
23-12-2010, 01:12 AM
They'd better stay away from Bazza!

KT31
23-12-2010, 02:00 AM
Hands off Bazza !!!

divvydan
23-12-2010, 03:39 AM
If we decided that 2011 would be Hall's last season and If GWS taking him would mean that they wouldn't have access to any of our other out of contract players and we'd get compensation for someone that was otherwise going to retire then it wouldn't be the worst thing.

Main thing would be the assumption that we wouldn't be planning on signing him for 2012.

chef
23-12-2010, 08:41 AM
I would rather lose Hall than Ward, Higgins etc.

This should be Hall's last season coming up with Jones, Grant and maybe Cordy ready to fill his shoes after he's gone so it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.

Plus getting a compo pick(no matter how crappy it is) for a player who was going to retire would be nice.

Daughter of the West
23-12-2010, 09:40 AM
If we decided that 2011 would be Hall's last season and If GWS taking him would mean that they wouldn't have access to any of our other out of contract players and we'd get compensation for someone that was otherwise going to retire then it wouldn't be the worst thing.

Main thing would be the assumption that we wouldn't be planning on signing him for 2012.

My initial reaction was, "Over My Dead Body!" but that is a fair point.

As an aside, Bazza might not be interested in playing another season after 2011 though, especially if he has the opportunity to go out on a high after we win the premiership next year (....a girl can dream, can't she?? :D).

LostDoggy
23-12-2010, 10:01 AM
I would rather lose Hall than Ward, Higgins etc.

This should be Hall's last season coming up with Jones, Grant and maybe Cordy ready to fill his shoes after he's gone so it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.

Plus getting a compo pick(no matter how crappy it is) for a player who was going to retire would be nice.

Good point Chef - my initial reaction was "Nooooooo" but I can see the sense in your post! If he is going to retire in 2012, and GWS want him, then ....okay!

Twodogs
23-12-2010, 10:18 AM
They can have as many as our 34+ years old players as they want.

BornInDroopSt'54
23-12-2010, 10:53 AM
Hall would be such an asset at our club beyond his playing days. His sheer presence, his nous, his marketability and yes the respect the football world has for him add so much to the club. Above all his ability to influence and teach our younger forwards is irreplaceable. Ex-forwards of his calibre and experience are expensive in the marketplace and are normally obtained through loyalty.
A club or even a nation's sport can be measured by the ex greats who pay back by teaching the next generation.
Greater Western Sydney, hands off!

Desipura
23-12-2010, 02:40 PM
trade him to Hawthorn for a 1st rounder

Remi Moses
23-12-2010, 04:01 PM
No they want Cooney for Carl Petersen and our first rounder .

LostDoggy
23-12-2010, 06:17 PM
Sick of the idea that GWS is playing in 2012 already, they are going around dropping names like Natanui, Swan and co, now Hall. Cannot see any attraction for the younger players to move there..and I really hope they fail and the AFL has egg all over its face. Cannot see them winning a premiership before 2020, no matter what big name they end up landing. They'll be the cellar dwellers like Carlton were for many years to come.

BornInDroopSt'54
23-12-2010, 06:43 PM
Sick of the idea that GWS is playing in 2012 already, they are going around dropping names like Natanui, Swan and co, now Hall. Cannot see any attraction for the younger players to move there..and I really hope they fail and the AFL has egg all over its face. Cannot see them winning a premiership before 2020, no matter what big name they end up landing. They'll be the cellar dwellers like Carlton were for many years to come.

????

LostDoggy
23-12-2010, 06:55 PM
????

Theyll just be there to make up numbers in the bottom 8 (like Carlton did from 2002-2008)

chef
23-12-2010, 07:04 PM
Theyll just be there to make up numbers in the bottom 8 (like Carlton did from 2002-2008)

They are going to put together a very good side that will take about 5 years to peak IMO. There is no way the AFL will let them just make the numbers, they need them to be competitive.

w3design
23-12-2010, 10:03 PM
i think hall can play for another two years maybe three .I remember when he first signed with us our medical staff and rocket said he had the body of a 30 year old and playing full forward not on the half forward line would help his body.

LostDoggy
24-12-2010, 08:00 AM
GWS, GWS, GWS. Am sick of hearing about them. The AFL should have made a Tassie Team. Such a waste of money IM humble O

LostDoggy
27-12-2010, 01:38 PM
They are going to put together a very good side that will take about 5 years to peak IMO. There is no way the AFL will let them just make the numbers, they need them to be competitive.

Absolutely. And with the NRL's royal stuff-up in regards to the Melbourne Storm controversy, this is the AFL's best shot at getting into NSW and QLD, and at getting more $$$ via TV rights. With two teams in Sydney, the AFL needs BOTH to be competitive. Two competitive teams, with one or both playing at home each week, attracting viewers and subsequently advertising money, means that all 18 teams will be better off financially. Too many reasons and too much moolah for the AFL to let them do it the hard way like the Swannies did.


i think hall can play for another two years maybe three .I remember when he first signed with us our medical staff and rocket said he had the body of a 30 year old and playing full forward not on the half forward line would help his body.

Realism or optimism?

The same comments were made from the day Johnno turned 30, about how durable he was. Players don't recover as well post-30 and it might only take one big injury to spell the end of Hally's career.


GWS, GWS, GWS. Am sick of hearing about them. The AFL should have made a Tassie Team. Such a waste of money IM humble O

The corporate world is not interested in advertising to Taswegians. Which is a shame, I agree they deserve it more, but it's all about the bucks.

Ghost Dog
05-01-2011, 04:50 PM
The corporate world is not interested in advertising to Taswegians. Which is a shame, I agree they deserve it more, but it's all about the bucks.

Bit more to it that. Tassie footy is as factional as you get. Only half the island will support whichever team they attempt to put there.

Drunken Bum
09-01-2011, 06:05 PM
Bit more to it that. Tassie footy is as factional as you get. Only half the island will support whichever team they attempt to put there.

I have always had the belief that the best(only) way for a tassie team to work would be to have it called Tasmania as opposed to Hobart or Launceston and to split the home games, and possibly even the training between the two cities. It's that not long of a drive between them and i think you would get people travelling to the other city to watch games because they truly feel it is their team.
I am not convinced a relocated side will work for it though.

Ghost Dog
10-01-2011, 01:24 AM
I have always had the belief that the best(only) way for a tassie team to work would be to have it called Tasmania as opposed to Hobart or Launceston and to split the home games, and possibly even the training between the two cities. It's that not long of a drive between them and i think you would get people travelling to the other city to watch games because they truly feel it is their team.
I am not convinced a relocated side will work for it though.

Right. Tasmania as the central theme / logo of the club or nothing really. I for one, would be much more excited about a Tassie team than a gold coast team / GWS.