It's hard for me to see both Tory Dickson and Jarrad Grant being played in the same forward line in the senior side unless there are a couple of injuries or Crameri is out for a while.
To be honest, I find it hard to squeeze both of them into our best forward set-up at the moment but I'd go with Dickson. Both of them are good players though but in the new requirement world of having versatile players under the Beveridge mantra neither strike as genuine versatile options despite what we might read.
Grant has more upside to his game but is far from a consistent performer. He is also a player that is hard to define the role he could play in the forward line because at 192cm he still isn't regarded as a tall and is seen more as a mid sized or even small forward option by many.
Dickson is more consistent and is certainly regarded as a mid sized forward and there are no Grant like discussions of what type of forward he is.
So I have a few questions for the WOOF community:
1) Which player out of Grant or Dickson is more likely to command a spot in our round one team?
2) Can we play both of them in our forward line for much of the season?
3) Can either player offer much more versatility to the side than primarily being a forward?
4) Come the end of the season which of them has the better season?
To help the discussion it would be good to get responses with some reasons behind your answers.