Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
So apparently we had Dana Hooker from Freo (think Nat Fyfe, down to the Freo jumper with a number 7 on it) over the line to join, but somehow stuffed it up at the last minute.
Just wouldn't be a Dogs flag without a swift piece of "list management".
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Happy Days
So apparently we had Dana Hooker from Freo (think Nat Fyfe, down to the Freo jumper with a number 7 on it) over the line to join, but somehow stuffed it up at the last minute.
Just wouldn't be a Dogs flag without a swift piece of "list management".
That's just a list of resigned players not new ones I think you will find.
Maybe we have to use the draft to get her, and might have already organised it with our first pick knowing what previous clubs have chosen already.
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ledge
That's just a list of resigned players not new ones I think you will find.
Maybe we have to use the draft to get her, and might have already organised it with our first pick knowing what previous clubs have chosen already.
Yeah nah, she re-signed with Freo.
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
Yeah nah, she re-signed with Freo.
Maybe we are chasing Hannah Mounsey.
Big build, hard to move and kicks long goals.
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
What was our compensation for losing Emma Kearney?
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mantis
What was our compensation for losing Emma Kearney?
There is another thread dedicated to that subject - but in the end we got pick 26 for losing 4 players including Kearney.
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ledge
Maybe we are chasing Hannah Mounsey.
Big build, hard to move and kicks long goals.
I'm not touching that one!
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
I'm not touching that one!
She (or he) was only banned from last years draft and is putting her name up for this one.
Interesting to see if she gets drafted.
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ledge
She (or he) was only banned from last years draft and is putting her name up for this one.
Interesting to see if she gets drafted.
It's she.
Re: AFLW: 22 Dogs re-sign
Re the Dana Hooker thing - I understand that it wasn’t a dogs stuff up, but because the women can nominate which state they want to play in and can’t be forced to move states, effectively we were unable to provide freo with a satisfactory trade - swapping or trading draft picks is effectively meaningless when freo is only picking from women who nominate wa, they have no competition. I surmise none of our list (at least those freo might have been willing to take) wanted to move to wa. Aflw rules again proven to be not fit for purpose.