So - it was 28 (us) and 19 (Lions).
There is a LOT of sooking going on by the Lions and their fans - but the most controversial decisions (imo) were:
1/. Bont goal being over-ruled. Clearly a wrong decision by those clowns at the ARC and another clear misuse of the system...it should be used for GOAL LINE REVIEWS, not trying to assess whether or not a fingernail touched the ball 40m from goal.
2/. The 'deliberate' now apparently insufficient intent decision vs Caleb. I actually don't mind them paying this but if this is 'deliberate', surely almost every kick that goes oob without being touched is pretty close to deliberate ('cos it was a skill error and any kick that misses a target is ALSO a skill error).
So - what's the truth? Were the Lions harshly penalised or was it a pretty fairly adjudicated game?