Yeah, I just can't see a slight step up in outside pace as being a worthwhile trade off.
Printable View
Dunks, as others have mentioned is a 'fabric' type player. Unless he were to express that he wants out, you don't voluntarily try to move on 'fabric' players
Yep, agree with others, not keen on trading Dunkley and he is certainly a 'fabric' type of player.
My mate who works for the club once said to me that he can't quite work out which one of Dale Morris or Josh Dunkley - is the best bloke he's ever met.
But on the footballing side - Dunks probably had another 10 years with us. Could be a captain of the club, and was in the All Australian squad last year.
And id throw in hasn't hit peak football maturity yet, the offer would want to be something special, and I don't think the bummers have anything to offer.
If we had an "untouchable" list of players, he is pretty close to being one of them.
If i were to pick a player on our list that's worth something on the trade table and we could potentially replace, it would be JJ.
Also didn't play in his preferred position this season. Play him as a full-time mid and we'll see his true value. It's an interesting situation we have with him and Libba. Libba's excellent form has meant less midfield time for Dunks. How do we get him in there more often?
I fail to see how Bevo has enough credits left in the bank to continue to be able to pull this ruck bullshit unencumbered. Surely someone senior steps in and forces the issue.
Jeemak has really worked this rumour, I'm now getting mates contacting me about losing Dunkley. Bloody Jeemak :)
I really don't like the title of this thread:(
Jeemak, if we lose Dunks to the Bombers I blame you for giving it legs.