Re: Scott plot revealed: Another Essendon Dog raid fails, but Gia ... it was close
Loved reading we dudded Essendon again.
Hopefully a similar trajectory to Dickson.
Re: Scott plot revealed: Another Essendon Dog raid fails, but Gia ... it was close
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
Not at all, just doing his job.
That is fair too fair for something involving Essendon.
Re: Scott plot revealed: Another Essendon Dog raid fails, but Gia ... it was close
Quote:
Originally Posted by
comrade
Scott impressed in the practice match? He had 4 kicked on him and was completely schooled by Breust playing in an unfamiliar defensive position. This is pretty bizarre all round but hey, let's add him to the pile of hybrid mid types we have on the list.
Yeah kinda wish the Essendon pitch didn't fail.
Re: Scott plot revealed: Another Essendon Dog raid fails, but Gia ... it was close
Quote:
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
Yeah kinda wish the Essendon pitch didn't fail.
Wouldn't be the first time we've been saved from ourselves
Re: Scott plot revealed: Another Essendon Dog raid fails, but Gia ... it was close
Quote:
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
Yeah kinda wish the Essendon pitch didn't fail.
Agree. Very uninspiring selection, especially with what we saw in his "impressive" display in the praccy game.
Fair effort by him to get onto a list though, points for persistence.
Re: Scott plot revealed: Another Essendon Dog raid fails, but Gia ... it was close
Not to say I'm stoked with this, but I'm thinking that he didn't reject a clear-cut offer from Essendon on the assumption that we would pick him up, and that his practice match performance had nothing to do with our decision.
Re: Scott plot revealed: Another Essendon Dog raid fails, but Gia ... it was close
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Happy Days
Not to say I'm stoked with this, but I'm thinking that he didn't reject a clear-cut offer from Essendon on the assumption that we would pick him up, and that his practice match performance had nothing to do with our decision.
Yeah, the 'impressive display' comment is just a furphy because a) he was in no way impressive (not his fault, played out of position on a genuine star forward) and b) we'd already committed to him