Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
I've heard the playing group are fairly disappointed with Jeemak and his enthusiasm to get rid of Josh. They haven't mentioned his name since the end of the trade period. Then again they didn't mention it before the trade period either.
I heard a lot of them are trembling at the thought of who will Jeemak nominate next.
Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
I've heard the playing group are fairly disappointed with Jeemak and his enthusiasm to get rid of Josh. They haven't mentioned his name since the end of the trade period. Then again they didn't mention it before the trade period either.
#tradejeemak #jeemakiscancelled
Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bornadog
I heard a lot of them are trembling at the thought of who will Jeemak nominate next.
Beware the wrath of Jeemak.
Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EasternWest
#tradejeemak #jeemakiscancelled
#jeemakiscancelculture
Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Everyone just needs to get some alternative facts straight.
It may have appeared that I was advocating for a Dunkley trade, or even incited an almost Dunkley trade. But I just wanted to make the Bulldogs great again.
In the end there were very fine people on both sides of the almost trade Dunkley scenario, and I just want to say, that what I said when I said that we should trade Dunkley was a very fine statement. It was a statement stated by a very sane genius poster, there hasn't been a more sane statement made by a poster for a while, well at least a very long time.
Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeemak
Everyone just needs to get some alternative facts straight.
It may have appeared that I was advocating for a Dunkley trade, or even incited an almost Dunkley trade. But I just wanted to make the Bulldogs great again.
In the end there were very fine people on both sides of the almost trade Dunkley scenario, and I just want to say, that what I said when I said that we should trade Dunkley was a very fine statement. It was a statement stated by a very sane genius poster, there hasn't been a more sane statement made by a poster for a while, well at least a very long time.
Thanks Donald :D:D
Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Thanks Donald :D:D
I don't think that is correct. I've looked at jee's email address it's a.dodoro
I feel like I should know that name
Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeemak
Everyone just needs to get some alternative facts straight.
It may have appeared that I was advocating for a Dunkley trade, or even incited an almost Dunkley trade. But I just wanted to make the Bulldogs great again.
In the end there were very fine people on both sides of the almost trade Dunkley scenario, and I just want to say, that what I said when I said that we should trade Dunkley was a very fine statement. It was a statement stated by a very sane genius poster, there hasn't been a more sane statement made by a poster for a while, well at least a very long time.
I never said that it wasn't a perfect post and that you aren't a very stable genius. However many people were saying that you should be impeached but I told them about your bone spurs (you must have been playing golf at the time) and now they've gone cold on the ideas.
Now repeat after me. Person, woman, man, camera, TV.
Re: Back in business: Dunkley eyes big 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
I don't think that is correct. I've looked at jee's email address it's a.dodoro
I feel like I should know that name
Andrew Dorado. I'm pretty sure he was on the Don Lane show.