Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Behind the goals, Geelong Rd end
    Posts
    6,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Etihad Stadium returns batter Saints, Kangaroos and Bulldogs

    Every Vic v Non-Vic games should be played at Etihad (or in Geelong's case, KP)
    Every Vic v Vic game played at MCG

    Problem solvered.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Etihad Stadium returns batter Saints, Kangaroos and Bulldogs

    Quote Originally Posted by Greystache View Post
    Agree, it would be a rediculous waste. Eithad IS the stadium for lower drawing games, it's just the investment company that owns it has created such a complex organisational strucutre that they can syphon off revenue to increase their profits.

    It's obsurd to think Melbourne Victory can get 15,000 there and make substantial profit, yet we get 30,000 there and have to write them a cheque. Why does it happen? Because Etihad management has to make the venue attractive for Victory so they choose to play there, whereas Etihad knows the AFL have negotiated themselves into a rediculously restrictive contract that prevents AFL clubs taking up more lucrative stadium offers.

    The AFL have screwed the clubs that have no alternative to play elsewhere so they could have a free boutique stadium built for them. They should do the right thing and try to purchase Etihad now, its clearly profitable, and they could invest the revenue back into the clubs rather than into the pockets of shareholders and executives.
    Summed it up perfectly. Eddie's right on the money, Etihad deals stink it up like a dead cat in the middle of the road.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    EJ Whitten Stand
    Posts
    2,935
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Etihad Stadium returns batter Saints, Kangaroos and Bulldogs

    Quote Originally Posted by Greystache View Post
    Agree, it would be a rediculous waste. Eithad IS the stadium for lower drawing games, it's just the investment company that owns it has created such a complex organisational strucutre that they can syphon off revenue to increase their profits.

    It's obsurd to think Melbourne Victory can get 15,000 there and make substantial profit, yet we get 30,000 there and have to write them a cheque. Why does it happen? Because Etihad management has to make the venue attractive for Victory so they choose to play there, whereas Etihad knows the AFL have negotiated themselves into a rediculously restrictive contract that prevents AFL clubs taking up more lucrative stadium offers.

    The AFL have screwed the clubs that have no alternative to play elsewhere so they could have a free boutique stadium built for them. They should do the right thing and try to purchase Etihad now, its clearly profitable, and they could invest the revenue back into the clubs rather than into the pockets of shareholders and executives.
    Spot on Stasche. However the AFL won't purchase the stadium now, they get it for free in 2025.
    "Loves a scrap....oh yeah & he's a pretty handy footballer as well"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •