Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  5
Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 154
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Yarraville
    Posts
    9,882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Quote Originally Posted by Topdog View Post
    Sounds uninspiring. 24y.o mid sized forward...
    ...with poor fitness

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,479
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    what's with the skepticism. He kicked 100 goals for Noble Park... Oh, Pat Bowden kicked 100 goals in a local league too. ok, i see the skepticism now.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  3. #33
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    braybrook boy living in wyndhamvale
    Posts
    1,461
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    I am willing to wait and see on this one rather grab a smoky at 57 than 17
    bulldogs are forever not just when they are winning

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kyabram
    Posts
    13,904
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Quote Originally Posted by Greystache View Post
    ...with poor fitness
    He only trained half an hour a week while with the bombers, so now being a full time footballer this shouldn't be a problem.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Yarraville
    Posts
    9,882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Quote Originally Posted by chef View Post
    He only trained half an hour a week while with the bombers, so now being a full time footballer this shouldn't be a problem.
    He was considered unfit by Noble Park standards, he has a massive amount of work ahead of him.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,188
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Quote Originally Posted by Greystache View Post
    He was considered unfit by Noble Park standards, he has a massive amount of work ahead of him.
    It's a bit of a stretch but could he develop as quickly as a Crameri under a full-time professional environment? Crameri was nowhere near AFL-fit until last pre-season when he tore it up on the track.

    Unlike some of our previous hail-mary selections, at least Dickson has good recent form at the next level below AFL.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Unusual first name, parents must have been a fan of Aaron Spellings work.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In renovator's dreams
    Posts
    6,297
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Honestly why wouldn't you just rookie list this guy? Sure he might be a player but seriously it's not like anyone else was going to draft him. Is there seriously not a junior we could have picked at 57 who has more upside than Dickson? It seems we are compelled to reach for players every year.
    Park that car
    Drop that phone
    Sleep on the floor
    Dream about me

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Surf Coast
    Posts
    5,466
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    What the ???
    Have they even had this bloke on the track and seen his potential ?
    Not happy with this pick at all.
    Underdogs is correct we should have rookied him.
    It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kyabram
    Posts
    13,904
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Quote Originally Posted by KT31 View Post
    What the ???
    Have they even had this bloke on the track and seen his potential ?
    Not happy with this pick at all.
    Underdogs is correct we should have rookied him.
    Grant has seen him for two of the last three years and McCartney would have seen him last year. They obviously rate him for some reason.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Quote Originally Posted by The Underdog View Post
    Honestly why wouldn't you just rookie list this guy? Sure he might be a player but seriously it's not like anyone else was going to draft him. Is there seriously not a junior we could have picked at 57 who has more upside than Dickson? It seems we are compelled to reach for players every year.
    James Hird was looking at him as a rookie.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    East of West
    Posts
    455
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Lots of examples of recent success with this sort of recruitment. Given his record in lower grades and the obvious endorsement of Shannon Grant, I am not unhappy with the selection. Crameri's achievement should be model.
    WesternOval'61

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wheelers Hill
    Posts
    4,200
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Everyone craps on about what a shallow draft this is. Seems to make sense to me that we would target a mature player with a strong body. I reserve my judgement on this one and note that no-one commenting here professes to have actually seen him play.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In renovator's dreams
    Posts
    6,297
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Quote Originally Posted by Desipura View Post
    James Hird was looking at him as a rookie.
    We still have a pick before them in the rookie draft
    Park that car
    Drop that phone
    Sleep on the floor
    Dream about me

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Pick 57- Tory Dickson

    Quote Originally Posted by The Underdog View Post
    We still have a pick before them in the rookie draft
    Who, knows we might want someone there too & this gave us the opportunity of getting both.

    Quote Originally Posted by always right View Post
    Everyone craps on about what a shallow draft this is. Seems to make sense to me that we would target a mature player with a strong body. I reserve my judgement on this one and note that no-one commenting here professes to have actually seen him play.
    Have to agree.
    85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •