Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,315
    Post Thanks / Like

    Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    Robbing Peter to Paul with a not necessarily suitable player, or do we have kind of a solution if we can't trade for a KPP forward and McDougall and Williams step up? (And Grant plays on down back).
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    dont think harris has enough class or footy smarts to be a full time forward,plus his kicking is suspect. grant is to old and injury prone to play in backline, and macdougall doesnt have it. at best he is a good vfl/wafl forward....williams might step up and be a very good player in the next few yrs

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry View Post
    dont think harris has enough class or footy smarts to be a full time forward,plus his kicking is suspect. grant is to old and injury prone to play in backline, and macdougall doesnt have it. at best he is a good vfl/wafl forward....williams might step up and be a very good player in the next few yrs
    ATM Williams has less smarts than Harris.
    Harris has a few attributes of a FF, played there as junior, aggressive, loses his head, can take a contested mark.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,708
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    If we do not pick up a ready made forward through the draft/ trade period I would like to see Harris play FF next year. I suppose we are taking a big gamble in thinking Williams and McDougall can hold down the key defensive posts with back-up from Wight, Everitt, Morris, etc.. but we have to take that chance. At the very least I would like to see us trial it through the pre-season. If it fails then we can chuck Brian back in defence.

    For it to work we need our midfielders and forwards to play a far more accountable style so that the ball comes into our defensive 50 under more pressure. If we move Harris up forward and play the same style we did this year then we will be throwing our young defenders to the wolves.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    i think cameron wight will develop in to a very good player. he moves so well for someone 200cm's. pre season is the gym and work on his leap, i think he could be a gun in the ruck.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry View Post
    i think cameron wight will develop in to a very good player. he moves so well for someone 200cm's. pre season is the gym and work on his leap, i think he could be a gun in the ruck.
    He need more than just a leap and muscle, he isn't a ruckman backside at the moment.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    have faith

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Behind the goals, Geelong Rd end
    Posts
    6,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    Wight has no chance to make it as a ruckman. Doesn't have a clue.

    Eade thinks he will make a defender, I think he moves like a natural forward but I'm not sure he's good enough overhead.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    why no chance as a ruckman? he needs more weight and bulk, then he will be able to take the punishment. he looks bit 'shy' in there at the minute

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In renovator's dreams
    Posts
    6,320
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    I'm just not sure he's a forward despite playing junior footy there.
    His few shots on goal this year were beyond atrocious, he has decent hands but does he know what to do movement wise? Plus he's a pretty good full back.

    As for Cam, if rd 22 showed anything it's that he's a long way off being a ruckman.
    Park that car
    Drop that phone
    Sleep on the floor
    Dream about me

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    if he cant get big enough to ruck, then he has got no chance at full back... darren glass is a tank

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Behind the goals, Geelong Rd end
    Posts
    6,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry View Post
    why no chance as a ruckman? he needs more weight and bulk, then he will be able to take the punishment. he looks bit 'shy' in there at the minute
    Nothing to do with height or bulk. I simply don't think he knows what to do.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    fair enough. i think its more a size and confidence thing. weights, work and wynd over the pre season and we will see

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Behind the goals, Geelong Rd end
    Posts
    6,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Underdog View Post
    I'm just not sure he's a forward despite playing junior footy there.
    His few shots on goal this year were beyond atrocious, he has decent hands but does he know what to do movement wise? Plus he's a pretty good full back.

    As for Cam, if rd 22 showed anything it's that he's a long way off being a ruckman.
    Stewart Loewe was an atrocious kick when he started - he got better. Loewe did have an advantage over most, those huge buckets of his that marked everything that come near him.

    I still think the single biggest attribute you need to be a forward is to be smart enough to lead at the right time and to the right place. In the very short time Wight played CHF he seemed to be doing this. He also has the tank to present over and over again - essential for a CHF. All he is missing is strength overhead.

    Eade singled out Wight in the latest edition of the Bulldog magazine and said that he (Eade) thought Wight would develp into a more than handy defender.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is there a case for Harris playing forward?

    seems a waste to have a guy 200cm and can run all day sitting in the backline

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •