Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 33 of 33
  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,056
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Struggling clubs 'need $2m each'

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    I agree with Mark Stevens, who tweeted that is was borderline insulting for the Dogs to be labelled a basket case seeing as we made 3 consecutive PF's in recent history.

    Anyway we won't be hearing much from Ed on this issue in the coming weeks. Needs to remove both feet from his mouth first.
    Quote Originally Posted by Happy Days View Post
    "Stuffed it up along the way", isn't that sticking in the craw of anyone else?

    We shot our wad trying to win a premiership in 2010, when Melbourne were still terrible.
    Could just agree with the forum's own!
    - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Struggling clubs 'need $2m each'

    Bit disappointing, and really patronising and condescending comments from Ed.
    It's silly however that we're paying 95% yet Sydney are 900 over !
    Makes a mockery of the salary cap to be honest.
    Melbourne are Paying 100%
    To be lumped in with them is a bit rich

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,978
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Struggling clubs 'need $2m each'

    Quote Originally Posted by Remi Moses View Post
    Bit disappointing, and really patronising and condescending comments from Ed.
    It's silly however that we're paying 95% yet Sydney are 900 over !
    Makes a mockery of the salary cap to be honest.
    Melbourne are Paying 100%
    To be lumped in with them is a bit rich



    Agreed. Especially as Melbourne picked up big names like Mitch Clark & Chris Dawes which gave their supporters a reason for optimism.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •