Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  32
Page 49 of 111 FirstFirst ... 39404142434445464748495051525354555657585999 ... LastLast
Results 721 to 735 of 1662

Thread: Crameri

  1. #721
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Is Essendon accept our offer of pick 22. We should say no, actually we are only offering pick 38 now.

  2. #722
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Danstar View Post
    Is Essendon accept our offer of pick 22. We should say no, actually we are only offering pick 38 now.
    That would only make us more petulant than them. I understand your sentiment, they're a shit of a club to deal with!
    85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!

  3. #723
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Shanghai
    Posts
    9,426
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Brendan has seen something in Crammers, much as Shannon Grant did in Tory Dickson. Essendon think perhaps Brendan will influence the recruiting team to pay overs.
    Last edited by Ghost Dog; 10-10-2013 at 01:38 AM.
    You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― Epicurus

  4. #724
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,152
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Let's put a different spin on things.

    We have bemoaned our club's trading culture over the years, because we've been too easy to deal with.

    We bemoan EFC's trading culture because they are too hard to deal with.

    EFC has drafted poorly over many years (last decade or so), albeit having finished in the mid table. They have not won any finals.

    WB have drafted OK over the last decade or 15 years, and lost 3 prelims.

    Would we have been in a better position, or worse position over these last 15 years if we had have taken EFC's stance, or the one we took (from a trading perspective)?

    I've always been extremely puzzled about the concept of Dodoro being a list and recruiting manager for as long as he has. To me he seems like a guy with a directive to not trade and develop through the draft, without the ability to develop through the draft. Or another thought, maybe player development under Sheedy was shit (like we're seeing at GWS now) and James and Bomber are picking up the slack.

    It's easy to pick on Dodoro, but seriously, this is a club that has been prettty shit for a lot of reasons over the last decade or so. I wouldn't be surprised he's acting under instruction (and always has been).

  5. #725
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,459
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    I've bemoaned us because we have been too eager to trade, not because we are easy to trade with. The only exception to that was Lake.

    I liked our deals with WC, Sydney and Brisbane in the past as we are giving up something for players we value that is fair and reasonable.

    Oh I and think you are kidding yourself if you think player development at GWS is shit. It amazes me how often people forget what happened just 1 season ago and everyone saying GC should sack the coach as their development is shit and they have stagnated.

    And every time I read Dodoro i think of Pororo

  6. #726
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,152
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Topdog View Post
    I've bemoaned us because we have been too eager to trade, not because we are easy to trade with. The only exception to that was Lake.

    I liked our deals with WC, Sydney and Brisbane in the past as we are giving up something for players we value that is fair and reasonable.

    Oh I and think you are kidding yourself if you think player development at GWS is shit. It amazes me how often people forget what happened just 1 season ago and everyone saying GC should sack the coach as their development is shit and they have stagnated.

    And every time I read Dodoro i think of Pororo
    We'll see with GWS. I think they would have been much better placed without Sheedy in charge. That's all. I really think he's a wanker and not as good as he's made out to be.

  7. #727
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,813
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    We'll see with GWS. I think they would have been much better placed without Sheedy in charge. That's all. I really think he's a wanker and not as good as he's made out to be.
    Of course Sheedy is shit, that's why Essendon got rid of him - he was clearly out of touch with how to relate to Gen X and the game plan had stagnated long ago. Sheedy didn't go to GWS as head coach, not really, he had a directive to do as much media as possible and show up at training and match day and make a dumb speech during the intervals of a game. Choco and Cameron are / were the drivers and that's why they're there. Sheedy is a purely a logo, a brand name to facilitate growth of the game in Sydney's outer-west. GWS players are being developed the right way by good people.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  8. #728
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,152
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    I'm not entirely sure Sheedy has little influence. How would I know?

    I wouldn't have him anywhere near my football club.

  9. #729
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,255
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    Of course Sheedy is shit, that's why Essendon got rid of him - he was clearly out of touch with how to relate to Gen X and the game plan had stagnated long ago. Sheedy didn't go to GWS as head coach, not really, he had a directive to do as much media as possible and show up at training and match day and make a dumb speech during the intervals of a game. Choco and Cameron are / were the drivers and that's why they're there. Sheedy is a purely a logo, a brand name to facilitate growth of the game in Sydney's outer-west. GWS players are being developed the right way by good people.
    Are you sure about Williams? I think Sheedy had more say than your giving credit for. Why else would Williams leave the Giants when a senior job was there for the taking and take up a development role at Richmond?
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  10. #730
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    A snippet from the Age:

    the Swans will trade Shane Mumford to Greater Western Sydney reasonably cheaply, given the Giants could acquire him for nothing using the pre-season draft.
    This will leave the Giants number 1 pick in the PSD uncommitted and opens up the chance of them taking Crameri if he ends up there. Hopefully Essendon come to their senses and we can get a deal done.

  11. #731
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,915
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Axe Man View Post
    A snippet from the Age:



    This will leave the Giants number 1 pick in the PSD uncommitted and opens up the chance of them taking Crameri if he ends up there. Hopefully Essendon come to their senses and we can get a deal done.
    Essendon will take pick 22 before they let Crameri go to the PSD, unless we withdraw the offer.
    'And the Western suburbs erupt!'

  12. #732
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,459
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by azabob View Post
    Are you sure about Williams? I think Sheedy had more say than your giving credit for. Why else would Williams leave the Giants when a senior job was there for the taking and take up a development role at Richmond?
    Because he was annoyed as he was guaranteed the job after 1 season.

  13. #733
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,255
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Topdog View Post
    Because he was annoyed as he was guaranteed the job after 1 season.
    I guess that proves my point, Sheedy had a massive say in what happened at GWS.
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  14. #734
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,813
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by azabob View Post
    I guess that proves my point, Sheedy had a massive say in what happened at GWS.
    Oh come on everyone knows that it's Vlad not Sheedy who pulls the strings at GWS and of course Vlad wanted Sheedy to stay on over Choco.

    http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/d...306-1uied.html

    Sheedy has had little to do with the management of anything since he got there except get on the media and say stupid things. As I said he's a brand name but now the real stuff starts for them.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  15. #735
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,255
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    Oh come on everyone knows that it's Vlad not Sheedy who pulls the strings at GWS and of course Vlad wanted Sheedy to stay on over Choco.

    http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/d...306-1uied.html

    Sheedy has had little to do with the management of anything since he got there except get on the media and say stupid things. As I said he's a brand name but now the real stuff starts for them.
    Oh, come on, everyone but me believes that.
    More of an In Bruges guy?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •