Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  3
Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 195

Thread: Lance Franklin

  1. #106
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,387
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    How's the ego on him?

    A young kid is forced to give up number '23' so he can have it. Not only arrogant but I suspect his branding stuff with number '23' on it has business implications for him.

    I tolerated him at Hawthorn, can't stand him now.
    Here are a couple of grabs from the below article

    "He is starting again with number 18, which is great for him," Franklin said
    It's about just getting on a list or playing a game, your jumper number doesn't matter as long as you're playing football for the Sydney Swans


    If it is just about playing footy - why did you need #23?

    http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/syd...-1226778774541
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  2. #107
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,687
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    How's the ego on him?

    A young kid is forced to give up number '23' so he can have it. Not only arrogant but I suspect his branding stuff with number '23' on it has business implications for him.

    I tolerated him at Hawthorn, can't stand him now.
    So Tony Lockett, all time goalkicking record holder, wears #46 for a year when he makes his (ultimately ill-fated) comeback, but Lance Franklin gets brought in on a mercenary's salary and poor Jordan Lockyer gets told 'too bad, so sad'.

  3. #108
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,387
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by westdog54 View Post
    So Tony Lockett, all time goalkicking record holder, wears #46 for a year when he makes his (ultimately ill-fated) comeback, but Lance Franklin gets brought in on a mercenary's salary and poor Jordan Lockyer gets told 'too bad, so sad'.
    Lockett did try to get #4, but Ben Matthews said no.
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  4. #109
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,687
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by azabob View Post
    Lockett did try to get #4, but Ben Matthews said no.
    That's exactly my point.

  5. #110
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,479
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by westdog54 View Post
    That's exactly my point.
    What is your point? That one person (Matthews) said no and another (Lockyer) didn't? Both had the choice.

  6. #111
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,387
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by Topdog View Post
    What is your point? That one person (Matthews) said no and another (Lockyer) didn't? Both had the choice.
    Not sure you are comparing apples with apples. Lockyer has played 1 season of footy (not one AFL game) Matthews had played 5 seasons and over 50 odd AFL games.
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  7. #112
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,687
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by Topdog View Post
    What is your point? That one person (Matthews) said no and another (Lockyer) didn't? Both had the choice.
    You honestly believe that?

  8. #113
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,147
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Shows a lack of respect and a self indulgent attitude if Buddy was adamant he needed to wear 23 but if it was offered up before he asked then I would not judge him too harshly.

    I would hope he sat down and discussed it with the kid before doing it either way though.

  9. #114
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,331
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    I think it was probably a matter of Buddy saying "I'd like to wear number 23", and those negotiating for Sydney saying "sure thing Bud" and telling the kid he's wearing a new number next year.

    All involved have probably well and truly moved on.

  10. #115
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    13,090
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    It's simply his trade mark number, everyone knows it and SYdney will continue it.
    Bring back the biff

  11. #116
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,687
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by ledge View Post
    It's simply his trade mark number, everyone knows it and SYdney will continue it.
    Trade Mark Number? Give me a spell. In my view there's only one bloke on the planet that can claim 23 as a 'Trade Mark Number' and that's Michael Jordan.

    Franklin was following in the footsteps of the likes of Don Scott and Dermot Brereton when he took Hawthorn's number 23. The number bears no relevance to his time at Sydney.

  12. #117
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,845
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    I think it was probably a matter of Buddy saying "I'd like to wear number 23", and those negotiating for Sydney saying "sure thing Bud" and telling the kid he's wearing a new number next year.

    All involved have probably well and truly moved on.
    Spot on and I don't see the big deal. Buddy's an arrogant superstar, but he's still a superstar. You cancel the Guy Sebastian concert if Michael Jackson says that's the same night that he wants to play.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  13. #118
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,845
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by westdog54 View Post
    Trade Mark Number? Give me a spell. In my view there's only one bloke on the planet that can claim 23 as a 'Trade Mark Number' and that's Michael Jordan.

    Franklin was following in the footsteps of the likes of Don Scott and Dermot Brereton when he took Hawthorn's number 23. The number bears no relevance to his time at Sydney.
    Lance Franklin is Australia's Michael Jordan no two ways about it. HE IS A FREAK! You need to bring it into the context where it belongs and that is Australian sport and more specifically the AFL. Go to outback communities and see what number they're all wearing.

    And what is the bolded about? Who cares about Scott and Dermie and where is the relevance with Franklin taking over their number? Of course the number existed prior to Franklin as did Jordan's but there is no question that Franklin has made it his own in the AFL - who he wears it with is simply a byproduct of the Buddy brand.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  14. #119
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,147
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Far as I am concerned Buddy was wearing Dermies number. He was the man when I was a kid and his deeds make Buddy look like a b grader.

  15. #120
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Lance Franklin

    Quote Originally Posted by Maddog37 View Post
    Far as I am concerned Buddy was wearing Dermies number. He was the man when I was a kid and his deeds make Buddy look like a b grader.


    Very much so. If Buddy had played in 5 premierships at CHF at Hawthorn then he could start to consider it being his number.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •