Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: TAC cup stats

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,921
    Post Thanks / Like

    TAC cup stats

    PLAYER MATCHES GOALS BEHINDS KICKS HBALLS DISP.EFF% HBALL.REC. TACKLES HITOUTS CON.MARKS UNC.MARKS

    B. Connelly 20 1.2 1.3 9.9 5.7 74.8 4.0 0.7 14.3 1.2 4.5
    A. Arrowsmith 19 1.6 0.8 15.5 5.1 69.5 6.6 1.8 0.2 0.4 4.6
    T. Dulic 18 0.3 0.1 8.1 5.2 76.8 4.1 1.9 0.1 0.7 2.7
    J. Polkinghorne 18 1.1 0.4 14.9 7.4 71.1 5.2 4.6 0.1 0.8 3.4
    B. Gilder 18 0.9 1.4 16.3 6.8 66.3 4.9 5.9 0.1 0.8 3.9
    A. Renton 18 0.8 0.4 6.5 6.7 81.0 2.7 1.7 22.1 1.1 3.1
    M. Farmer 18 1.2 1.2 12.9 5.4 72.6 4.6 3.4 0.1 0.6 3.1
    D. Simpson 18 0.3 0.2 3.8 3.7 75.5 1.4 2.1 15.4 0.9 1.7
    B. Mcevoy 18 1.6 0.7 9.9 6.1 82.2 2.2 1.5 14.4 2.5 5.5
    M. Lobbe 17 0.9 0.8 9.5 7.0 67.5 3.1 2.2 8.9 1.5 3.3
    M. Kreuzer 17 1.9 0.9 13.1 5.5 74.7 4.6 3.6 23.9 2.2 3.1
    J. Hall 17 0.4 0.4 17.7 6.1 74.5 7.4 3.6 0.1 1.1 5.5
    D. Mckenna 17 1.5 0.9 10.9 3.0 70.7 2.9 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.8
    H. Kay 17 1.0 0.8 12.3 4.2 68.3 3.7 2.8 0.5 1.2 3.0
    W. Sullivan 16 0.1 0.2 4.1 5.2 70.4 2.0 2.6 21.0 0.8 2.1
    C. Hinkley 16 0.6 0.4 15.9 7.5 67.3 7.2 4.4 0.0 0.1 4.2
    A. Otten 15 1.3 1.5 14.9 11.4 76.4 7.3 4.8 0.4 2.3 3.8
    M. Cook 15 1.1 1.3 12.0 6.0 65.1 4.6 4.4 0.0 0.6 2.5
    C. Ward 14 1.6 0.4 15.4 5.7 81.7 5.1 2.7 0.1 1.9 5.1
    S. Selwood 14 0.1 0.4 15.4 11.0 68.5 7.2 5.1 0.1 0.5 5.9
    R. Tarrant 14 1.6 1.6 11.4 5.9 72.0 2.6 2.3 1.6 1.7 3.5
    C. Kangars 14 0.1 0.1 4.3 6.5 80.1 3.6 3.4 2.6 0.5 1.6
    A. Hockey 14 1.2 0.6 14.9 5.8 73.3 6.1 2.7 0.4 0.6 5.5
    S. Simpson 13 1.5 1.3 8.3 7.0 77.3 1.8 2.8 3.9 1.6 3.5
    D. Zaharikis 12 0.1 0.5 15.2 7.0 66.9 7.5 3.4 0.0 0.8 3.5
    R. Normington 12 0.4 0.8 13.3 5.8 70.0 6.4 1.4 0.0 0.7 4.3
    S. Gaertner 11 0.8 0.4 8.8 3.4 73.8 3.1 2.3 3.8 1.5 3.5
    P. Vezpremi 11 3.1 1.5 14.2 5.3 77.1 5.8 2.7 0.0 0.9 3.2
    J. Grimes 9 1.0 0.4 23.2 5.3 64.9 7.8 2.7 0.0 0.8 6.3
    P. Dangerfield 9 0.7 0.3 10.4 4.4 64.1 3.3 3.1 0.1 1.0 2.2
    H. Sandilands 8 0.8 0.9 12.9 5.3 66.2 3.9 4.9 5.0 1.6 3.8
    L. Hill 8 1.0 0.6 10.4 4.6 65.0 4.8 3.8 0.1 0.9 1.9
    J. Grant 8 3.4 2.1 9.5 7.8 84.1 2.9 2.1 0.5 2.9 3.6
    H. Croft 7 0.4 0.3 10.7 11.3 64.9 4.4 6.1 0.4 1.6 4.6
    J. Mccarthy 7 1.0 1.1 12.4 9.4 75.1 5.9 2.6 0.1 0.7 4.6
    T. Cotchin 7 1.3 2.1 19.3 8.1 65.6 8.1 2.9 0.0 1.4 3.9
    L. Henderson 6 1.8 0.8 9.5 4.8 80.2 2.3 3.7 5.5 1.7 3.7
    T. Bellchambers 3 0.7 0.3 4.3 5.3 65.5 1.3 1.7 30.3 1.7 2.0
    A. Joseph 3 0.3 1.0 14.3 8.7 66.6 6.0 3.3 0.0 0.3 6.3
    Z. Murphy 3 1.0 0.7 17.0 13.7 71.7 11.0 3.0 0.0 0.7 3.7
    M. Davis 3 1.0 1.0 6.0 7.7 75.6 2.0 2.0 0.3 1.0 2.0
    J. Mulligan 3 1.0 1.0 6.3 3.3 65.5 0.7 2.3 1.0 0.3 2.3
    S. Reid 3 1.0 1.0 18.3 13.3 65.2 11.0 4.7 0.3 1.0 5.0
    J. Smouha 3 0.7 0.3 6.7 3.7 58.1 2.3 2.3 11.7 0.0 2.3
    A. Maric 2 2.0 1.0 15.0 5.5 75.6 5.0 1.5 0.0 0.5 3.5
    B. Whitecross 2 0.5 0.5 14.0 9.5 74.4 8.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 9.5

    Originally made in excel and so doesn't format properly, here's the top 10 of 6 of the stats:

    GOALS DISPOSALS MARKS
    1 - J.Grant – 3.4 1- S.Reid – 31.7 1- B.Whitecross - 10
    2 - P.Vezpremi – 3.1 2- Z.Murphy – 30.7 2- B.Mcevoy - 8
    3 - A.Maric – 2.0 3- J.Grimes – 28.5 3- J.Grimes – 7.1
    4 - M.Kreuzer – 1.9 4- T.Cotchin – 27.4 4- C.Ward – 6.9
    5 - L.Henderson – 1.8 5- S.Selwood – 26.4 5- A.Joseph – 6.7
    6 - B.Mcevoy – 1.6 6- A.Otten – 26.3 6- J.Grant – 6.5
    7 - R.Tarrant – 1.6 7- J.Hall – 23.8 7- J.Hall – 6.5
    8 - C.Ward – 1.6 8- B.Whitecross – 23.5 8- S.Selwood – 6.4
    9 - A. Arrowsmith – 1.6 9- C.Hinkley – 23.4 9- A.Otten – 6.1
    10 - D.Mckenna – 1.5 10- B.Gilder – 23.1 10- A.Hockey – 6.1

    C-MARKS DISPOSAL EFF.% HITOUTS
    1- J.Grant – 2.9 1- J.Grant – 84.1 1- T.Bellchambers – 30.3
    2- B.Mcevoy – 2.5 2- B.Mcevoy – 82.2 2- M.Kreuzer – 23.9
    3- A.Otten – 2.3 3- C.Ward – 81.7 3- A.Renton – 22.1
    4- M.Kreuzer – 2.2 4- A.Renton – 81 4- W.Sullivan - 21
    5- D.Mckenna – 2.1 5- L.Henderson – 80.2 5- D.Simpson – 15.4
    6- C.Ward – 1.9 6- C.Kangars – 80.1 6- B.Mcevoy – 14.4
    7- R.Tarrant – 1.7 7- S.Simpson – 77.3 7- B.Connelly – 14.3
    8- L.Henderson – 1.7 8- P.Vezpremi – 77.1 8- J.Smouha – 11.7
    9- T.Bellchambers – 1.7 9- T.Dulic – 76.8 9- M.Lobbe – 8.9
    10- S.Simpson – 1.6 10- A.Otten – 76.4 10- L.Henderson – 5.5

    Make of it what you will, for mine Jarrad Grant has become a favourable candidate for pick 5.
    'And the Western suburbs erupt!'

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    Ben McEvoy also ranks pretty highly too.
    85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,921
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    damn, that really didn't come out well, just to clarify on some of the pick 5 possibilities,

    Lachlan Henderson got on average 1.8 goals, 14.3 disposals and 5.3 marks in 6 matches

    Ben Mcevoy got on average 1.6 goals, 16 disposals, 8 marks and 14.4 hitouts in 18 matches

    Jarrod Grant got on average 3.4, 17.5 disposals and 6.7 marks (including 2.9 con.) in 8 matches
    'And the Western suburbs erupt!'

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,921
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    Quote Originally Posted by The Coon Dog View Post
    Ben McEvoy also ranks pretty highly too.
    indeed he does
    'And the Western suburbs erupt!'

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,754
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    Lets see if this helps it at all.


    Code:
    PLAYER MATCHES GOALS BEHINDS KICKS HBALLS DISP.EFF% HBALL.REC. TACKLES HITOUTS CON.MARKS UNC.MARKS
    
    B. Connelly 20 1.2 1.3 9.9 5.7 74.8 4.0 0.7 14.3 1.2 4.5
    A. Arrowsmith 19 1.6 0.8 15.5 5.1 69.5 6.6 1.8 0.2 0.4 4.6
    T. Dulic 18 0.3 0.1 8.1 5.2 76.8 4.1 1.9 0.1 0.7 2.7
    J. Polkinghorne 18 1.1 0.4 14.9 7.4 71.1 5.2 4.6 0.1 0.8 3.4
    B. Gilder 18 0.9 1.4 16.3 6.8 66.3 4.9 5.9 0.1 0.8 3.9
    A. Renton 18 0.8 0.4 6.5 6.7 81.0 2.7 1.7 22.1 1.1 3.1
    M. Farmer 18 1.2 1.2 12.9 5.4 72.6 4.6 3.4 0.1 0.6 3.1
    D. Simpson 18 0.3 0.2 3.8 3.7 75.5 1.4 2.1 15.4 0.9 1.7
    B. Mcevoy 18 1.6 0.7 9.9 6.1 82.2 2.2 1.5 14.4 2.5 5.5
    M. Lobbe 17 0.9 0.8 9.5 7.0 67.5 3.1 2.2 8.9 1.5 3.3
    M. Kreuzer 17 1.9 0.9 13.1 5.5 74.7 4.6 3.6 23.9 2.2 3.1
    J. Hall 17 0.4 0.4 17.7 6.1 74.5 7.4 3.6 0.1 1.1 5.5
    D. Mckenna 17 1.5 0.9 10.9 3.0 70.7 2.9 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.8
    H. Kay 17 1.0 0.8 12.3 4.2 68.3 3.7 2.8 0.5 1.2 3.0
    W. Sullivan 16 0.1 0.2 4.1 5.2 70.4 2.0 2.6 21.0 0.8 2.1
    C. Hinkley 16 0.6 0.4 15.9 7.5 67.3 7.2 4.4 0.0 0.1 4.2
    A. Otten 15 1.3 1.5 14.9 11.4 76.4 7.3 4.8 0.4 2.3 3.8
    M. Cook 15 1.1 1.3 12.0 6.0 65.1 4.6 4.4 0.0 0.6 2.5
    C. Ward 14 1.6 0.4 15.4 5.7 81.7 5.1 2.7 0.1 1.9 5.1
    S. Selwood 14 0.1 0.4 15.4 11.0 68.5 7.2 5.1 0.1 0.5 5.9
    R. Tarrant 14 1.6 1.6 11.4 5.9 72.0 2.6 2.3 1.6 1.7 3.5
    C. Kangars 14 0.1 0.1 4.3 6.5 80.1 3.6 3.4 2.6 0.5 1.6
    A. Hockey 14 1.2 0.6 14.9 5.8 73.3 6.1 2.7 0.4 0.6 5.5
    S. Simpson 13 1.5 1.3 8.3 7.0 77.3 1.8 2.8 3.9 1.6 3.5
    D. Zaharikis 12 0.1 0.5 15.2 7.0 66.9 7.5 3.4 0.0 0.8 3.5
    R. Normington 12 0.4 0.8 13.3 5.8 70.0 6.4 1.4 0.0 0.7 4.3
    S. Gaertner 11 0.8 0.4 8.8 3.4 73.8 3.1 2.3 3.8 1.5 3.5
    P. Vezpremi 11 3.1 1.5 14.2 5.3 77.1 5.8 2.7 0.0 0.9 3.2
    J. Grimes 9 1.0 0.4 23.2 5.3 64.9 7.8 2.7 0.0 0.8 6.3
    P. Dangerfield 9 0.7 0.3 10.4 4.4 64.1 3.3 3.1 0.1 1.0 2.2
    H. Sandilands 8 0.8 0.9 12.9 5.3 66.2 3.9 4.9 5.0 1.6 3.8
    L. Hill 8 1.0 0.6 10.4 4.6 65.0 4.8 3.8 0.1 0.9 1.9
    J. Grant 8 3.4 2.1 9.5 7.8 84.1 2.9 2.1 0.5 2.9 3.6
    H. Croft 7 0.4 0.3 10.7 11.3 64.9 4.4 6.1 0.4 1.6 4.6
    J. Mccarthy 7 1.0 1.1 12.4 9.4 75.1 5.9 2.6 0.1 0.7 4.6
    T. Cotchin 7 1.3 2.1 19.3 8.1 65.6 8.1 2.9 0.0 1.4 3.9
    L. Henderson 6 1.8 0.8 9.5 4.8 80.2 2.3 3.7 5.5 1.7 3.7
    T. Bellchambers 3 0.7 0.3 4.3 5.3 65.5 1.3 1.7 30.3 1.7 2.0
    A. Joseph 3 0.3 1.0 14.3 8.7 66.6 6.0 3.3 0.0 0.3 6.3
    Z. Murphy 3 1.0 0.7 17.0 13.7 71.7 11.0 3.0 0.0 0.7 3.7
    M. Davis 3 1.0 1.0 6.0 7.7 75.6 2.0 2.0 0.3 1.0 2.0
    J. Mulligan 3 1.0 1.0 6.3 3.3 65.5 0.7 2.3 1.0 0.3 2.3
    S. Reid 3 1.0 1.0 18.3 13.3 65.2 11.0 4.7 0.3 1.0 5.0
    J. Smouha 3 0.7 0.3 6.7 3.7 58.1 2.3 2.3 11.7 0.0 2.3
    A. Maric 2 2.0 1.0 15.0 5.5 75.6 5.0 1.5 0.0 0.5 3.5
    B. Whitecross 2 0.5 0.5 14.0 9.5 74.4 8.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 9.5
    
    Originally made in excel and so doesn't format properly, here's the top 10 of 6 of the stats:
    
    GOALS DISPOSALS MARKS
    1 - J.Grant – 3.4 1- S.Reid – 31.7 1- B.Whitecross - 10
    2 - P.Vezpremi – 3.1 2- Z.Murphy – 30.7 2- B.Mcevoy - 8
    3 - A.Maric – 2.0 3- J.Grimes – 28.5 3- J.Grimes – 7.1
    4 - M.Kreuzer – 1.9 4- T.Cotchin – 27.4 4- C.Ward – 6.9
    5 - L.Henderson – 1.8 5- S.Selwood – 26.4 5- A.Joseph – 6.7
    6 - B.Mcevoy – 1.6 6- A.Otten – 26.3 6- J.Grant – 6.5
    7 - R.Tarrant – 1.6 7- J.Hall – 23.8 7- J.Hall – 6.5
    8 - C.Ward – 1.6 8- B.Whitecross – 23.5 8- S.Selwood – 6.4
    9 - A. Arrowsmith – 1.6 9- C.Hinkley – 23.4 9- A.Otten – 6.1
    10 - D.Mckenna – 1.5 10- B.Gilder – 23.1 10- A.Hockey – 6.1
    
    C-MARKS DISPOSAL EFF.% HITOUTS
    1- J.Grant – 2.9 1- J.Grant – 84.1 1- T.Bellchambers – 30.3
    2- B.Mcevoy – 2.5 2- B.Mcevoy – 82.2 2- M.Kreuzer – 23.9
    3- A.Otten – 2.3 3- C.Ward – 81.7 3- A.Renton – 22.1
    4- M.Kreuzer – 2.2 4- A.Renton – 81 4- W.Sullivan - 21
    5- D.Mckenna – 2.1 5- L.Henderson – 80.2 5- D.Simpson – 15.4
    6- C.Ward – 1.9 6- C.Kangars – 80.1 6- B.Mcevoy – 14.4
    7- R.Tarrant – 1.7 7- S.Simpson – 77.3 7- B.Connelly – 14.3
    8- L.Henderson – 1.7 8- P.Vezpremi – 77.1 8- J.Smouha – 11.7
    9- T.Bellchambers – 1.7 9- T.Dulic – 76.8 9- M.Lobbe – 8.9
    10- S.Simpson – 1.6 10- A.Otten – 76.4 10- L.Henderson – 5.5

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    From what i have seen of Ben Mcevoy (which is 2 minutes online), he looks a bit slow. He is in between a CHF and a ruckman size. I would prefer a mobile 6'4 player (with good hands)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,254
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry View Post
    From what i have seen of Ben Mcevoy (which is 2 minutes online), he looks a bit slow. He is in between a CHF and a ruckman size. I would prefer a mobile 6'4 player (with good hands)
    He is 200cm tall.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,930
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    He is 200cm tall.
    As supporters we have gotten very used to the Clayton regular type draft picks so it will be an interesting process if we do take McEvoy because we never have taken a guy that big with our first pick

    Cleary given our lack of success something needs to change - I dont know enough about it to know if McEvoy is the right pick for us

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    634
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    He is 200cm tall.
    Do you see him purely as a forward or a forward that will also spend a fair bit of time in the ruck.

    Could McEvoy carve out a career for himself mainly as a ruckman?

    The reason why I ask is that it's a weakness with a lot of ruckman in that when they are not in the ruck they aren't good enough to play forward.
    Bulldog Pride will never die

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,368
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    I could see the club perhaps trying to pick up two talls with 5 & 19, one being a powerhouse and the other being the athletic type.

    Any chances of McEvoy or Henderson at 5 and Grant at 19?

    What other possibles could there be at 19?
    W00F!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,368
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    Quote Originally Posted by southerncross View Post
    The reason why I ask is that it's a weakness with a lot of ruckman in that when they are not in the ruck they aren't good enough to play forward.
    That'll probably be the hardest thing for clubs to decide on. Eg. We are after a powerhouse forward, but is it drafting a player like Darcy if we go for McEvoy? We're obviously after a young quality ruck too, but I think our main focus is picking up a couple KPFs. In that case, do we pass on McEvoy?

    It's a tough one. Even Grant - despite being a very good contested mark - is only 191cm, does that have an effect on who we'll take? It's a risk, as are all draftees to an extent, but it can be hard to predict if a player will fall into the "in between" category which McEvoy & Grant could.
    W00F!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    i didnt think grant would have better stats than either of henderson and mcevoy. I find that very suprising.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,754
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: TAC cup stats

    Quote Originally Posted by sonofthewest View Post
    i didnt think grant would have better stats than either of henderson and mcevoy. I find that very suprising.

    Henderson hardly played and McEvoy was used a lot at the FF position. Grant got a lot more of the footy than them

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •