Mitch Honeychurch

[Go_Dogs]

Fast becoming one of my favourites for his defensive work and intensity. His disposal and offensive work was a lot better this week than last and he's really finding his feet at AFL level now.

He's benefitted perhaps from both Hrovat and Hunter being unavailable for selection in the early rounds but it's going to be very difficult to displace him if he keeps up his current form, and indeed, continues to improve.

A lot to like at the moment, and whilst most of the attention has been on our higher profile, early draft picks, his improvement has been just as impressive. It's great to have the elite game breakers, but equally important to have blokes like Honey forming the backbone of our side.

Is he now a lock best 22 player?
Can we play all of him, Dahl, Hrovat and Hunter in the same side?
Where will he end up playing his best football, noting he seems very comfortable in the midfield, as well as being a terrier up forward?

[bulldogtragic]

Watching him yesterday, I thought we'd uncovered a faster Liberatore Snr.

So, I really liked watching it. Forget just Dahl, Hrovat, Hunter & Honey. We've got Daniel and a few other smalls too.

[bornadog]

I think at this stage Honeychurch is in the best 22, he goes in hard, has some speed, tackles and harasses and can kick a goal here and there. He has faded a bit towards the last quarter over the past two weeks, but I think that is understandable.

[whythelongface]

He has been really good over the last couple of weeks. Hard at the ball and has speed. He was a steal at pick 60.

[Go_Dogs]

Watching him yesterday, I thought we'd uncovered a faster Liberatore Snr.

So, I really liked watching it. Forget just Dahl, Hrovat, Hunter & Honey. We've got Daniel and a few other smalls too.

It's a good point, forgot about Daniel and we can add McLean, Hamilton and Dale at to that list.

It's going to be interesting to see how we manage it over the balance of the season and beyond.

[bornadog]

It's a good point, forgot about Daniel and we can add McLean, Hamilton and Dale at to that list.

It's going to be interesting to see how we manage it over the balance of the season and beyond.

I wouldn't be worrying about the first year players at this stage, that is a question for next year or late in the season. Its really a question of Dahl, Honey, Hrovat and Hunter and who is ahead of who.

[ratsmac]

I wouldn't be worrying about the first year players at this stage, that is a question for next year or late in the season. Its really a question of Dahl, Honey, Hrovat and Hunter and who is ahead of who.

It's quite the conundrum isn't it. All 4 have genuine claims to be regulars, but can we fit in all 4 while keeping team balance? I believe they call this depth.

[F'scary]

I don't think there is a problem playing 3 or 4 players under 180cm if they are good enough. We've got a pretty big, robust team otherwise when you look at it.

[Smads57]

I think at this stage Honeychurch is in the best 22, he goes in hard, has some speed, tackles and harasses and can kick a goal here and there. He has faded a bit towards the last quarter over the past two weeks, but I think that is understandable.

Agree that Honey has faded the last two weeks - I noticed also at the end of last year in the VFL finals series he was "stuffed" by season's end. It might be an idea for the match committee to look after him and rest him every 6 weeks or so. Will be a great player when he has another couple of pre-seasons in him. Another fan favourite!

(NB - we are really spoilt as Bulldogs supporters for "fan favorites" at present - I can't make up my mind - glad i'm not a kid having to decide which players number to have on my jumper....#can't decide)

[westdog54]

I think at this stage Honeychurch is in the best 22, he goes in hard, has some speed, tackles and harasses and can kick a goal here and there. He has faded a bit towards the last quarter over the past two weeks, but I think that is understandable.

His lack of tank definitely stood out in preseason last year but he's still young. I'll judge him again after another couple of preseasons.

[bulldogtragic]

His lack of tank definitely stood out in preseason last year but he's still young. I'll judge him again after another couple of preseasons.

A few posters have talked about needing a gun small defender. His tenacity could be good down back, if other smalls hurt the scoreboard better. If he tires late season, perhaps that could be a try?

[GVGjr]

A few posters have talked about needing a gun small defender. His tenacity could be good down back, if other smalls hurt the scoreboard better. If he tires late season, perhaps that could be a try?

Maybe, I tend to think that Hunter might be the first one to go to the back 6.

[bulldogtragic]

Maybe, I tend to think that Hunter might be the first one to go to the back 6.

Id be happy with that. He's just behind Grant in players that inspires no confidence in set shot kicking.

[The Bulldogs Bite]

Maybe, I tend to think that Hunter might be the first one to go to the back 6.

One thing that Hunter will need to bring to his game (wherever he plays) is a real hard, defensive intent. He hasn't displayed it yet, in fact some of his poorest moments have been him showing zero defensive intent. He's a very classy player but with the way we are wanting to play, we cannot afford 'missing links'.

I love Honeychurch. I saw him dominate a couple of VFL games from the midfield early to mid last season and was sold on him as a player. I was hesitant when we drafted him, but his tenacity is infectious - he literally throws himself into contests and loves tackling. Quite a smart player too in terms of reading the play - he just needs a bit more composure and fitness, both of which come with games/years.

Not sure we can play all three of Honey/Hrovat/Hunter as the side currently is. We can play two of them. To play three, somebody like JJ (possibly Grant) would need to be out of form.

[stefoid]

I wanted rovat in for Honeychurch after round 1 , but now I changed my mind.

Still grumpy that Daniel is injured though. Polished disposal we could use more of.