Thanks Thanks:  69
Likes Likes:  506
Page 50 of 90 FirstFirst ... 404142434445464748495051525354555657585960 ... LastLast
Results 736 to 750 of 1343

Thread: Well Ruck Me.

  1. #736
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,207
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    The only player in there better than Sweet / English is Ceglar. McEvoy is getting on now (33 next year) and Ceglar is late 20s. I'd be ok with Ceglar.
    Ceglar will be 31 in February
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  2. #737
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,838
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    The only player in there better than Sweet / English is Ceglar. McEvoy is getting on now (33 next year) and Ceglar is late 20s. I'd be ok with Ceglar.
    I think they are all comfortably better than English in the ruck.

    Strachan I rate and would be my preferred choice of that lot. Ceglar I've always kind of liked and would be content with.
    I should leave it alone but you're not right

  3. Likes Mofra liked this post
  4. #738
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,838
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Ceglar will be 31 in February
    Like he said late 20s, just like me.
    I should leave it alone but you're not right

  5. Likes bornadog, azabob, Testekill liked this post
  6. #739
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,811
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Ceglar will be 31 in February
    Thought he was 29, still 31 is not old for a ruckman actually it's almost the prime age in terms of experience, strength and conditioning. We'd get three years out of him.

  7. Likes Testekill liked this post
  8. #740
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,811
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by soupman View Post
    I think they are all comfortably better than English in the ruck.

    Strachan I rate and would be my preferred choice of that lot. Ceglar I've always kind of liked and would be content with.
    Yes certainly better than English. As it stands we'll have one ruckman on the list at the end of this year and that needs to change.

  9. #741
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,207
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    Thought he was 29, still 31 is not old for a ruckman actually it's almost the prime age in terms of experience, strength and conditioning. We'd get three years out of him.
    I agree, 31 is fine these days
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  10. #742
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,701
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Issue with Stef wasn't just this age, it was body (I know that can be easily linked). Stef + another mature ruck would have been great.

    For next year we have:
    - Stef probably gone. If he is keen, we think the body can give us 7-10 games and he is happy to play for very little coin, I'd keep him on. Think his body is just going to get worse though. Basically there as a player coach if he can go.
    - Sweet. Despite fan frustration with him now playing, he is progressing. He was raw AF and is getting closer. Hopefully with another pre-season he becomes the back up option next season.
    - English 2nd ruck/fwd. Darcy there in the future. Lewy improving there as an option. I think the 2nd ruck/forward role is fine and we can really concentrate on a 1st ruck.

  11. Likes GVGjr liked this post
  12. #743
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5,282
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    We have a very good core of players and are in a window for the next 5 years.
    If you were a ruck in a team that is rebuilding would you not look at the Dogs as a club to go for if you wanted a chance at finals.
    Martin may not go on next year and Sweet is your only opposition I would think we would look very attractive.
    Don't piss off old people
    The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...

  13. #744
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,407
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    We don’t have to do one or the other. But say we did...

    1. Re-Rookie a young Sweet

    2. Rookie List an old Martin. The new list rule this year is you can move a player automatically down from the Primary List to the Rookie List who is contracted for 2022+. It’s done between the National Draft & Rookie Draft. So we could sign Martin for 2022 and use this rule to automatically move him to the Rookie List without delisting him and then waiting around to re-sign him.


    Assuming we get a younger First Ruck with English as the second ruck. Would you have on the Rookie List, Sweet or Martin? Or both?
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  14. #745
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5,282
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Do we rookie Martin as Bevo puts it break glass and go all out on Sweet for half a season with Martin as his mentor and if Sweet doesn't show improvement then it's time to look elsewhere. We will have Darcy also under Martin's wing so that will also push Sweet along who will be 24 and should start playing like he belongs.
    Don't piss off old people
    The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...

  15. #746
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    We don’t have to do one or the other. But say we did...

    1. Re-Rookie a young Sweet

    2. Rookie List an old Martin. The new list rule this year is you can move a player automatically down from the Primary List to the Rookie List who is contracted for 2022+. It’s done between the National Draft & Rookie Draft. So we could sign Martin for 2022 and use this rule to automatically move him to the Rookie List without delisting him and then waiting around to re-sign him.


    Assuming we get a younger First Ruck with English as the second ruck. Would you have on the Rookie List, Sweet or Martin? Or both?
    Quote Originally Posted by Hotdog60 View Post
    Do we rookie Martin as Bevo puts it break glass and go all out on Sweet for half a season with Martin as his mentor and if Sweet doesn't show improvement then it's time to look elsewhere. We will have Darcy also under Martin's wing so that will also push Sweet along who will be 24 and should start playing like he belongs.
    That's exactly what we should do. Extend Martin's contract and move him to the rookie list and keep him as a break glass option. That way he can coach or mentor Sweet, Darcy and English and we have a bit of flexibility on the main list to bring in another experienced ruckman or a ruck/forward.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  16. #747
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,139
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    I agree, 31 is fine these days
    What about 42 sugar?
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  17. #748
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,244
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    What about 42 sugar?
    Blend 43?
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  18. #749
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,304
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Hindsight..... Bevo has finally realised how important the ruck situation is. What would '19 and '20 have been like had we acted then? would we be in an even better position now?

    Im not sold on a dads army ruck approach, I think we need to outlay something decent to get someone decent, I think Mr Power will be really working his magic this off season.

  19. #750
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,762
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by ReLoad View Post
    Hindsight..... Bevo has finally realised how important the ruck situation is. What would '19 and '20 have been like had we acted then? would we be in an even better position now?

    Im not sold on a dads army ruck approach, I think we need to outlay something decent to get someone decent, I think Mr Power will be really working his magic this off season.

    We were gonna recruit that bloke from Port who got delisted (lucky for us it didn't happen) and I'm sure we've tried for others (Steph has apparently been a consistent target) so I'm not sure the above is fair. He clearly has an idea of what a ruckman is that fits this team but filling that role has been difficult.

  20. Likes bornadog, azabob, 1eyedog liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •