Thanks Thanks:  69
Likes Likes:  506
Page 58 of 90 FirstFirst ... 8484950515253545556575859606162636465666768 ... LastLast
Results 856 to 870 of 1343

Thread: Well Ruck Me.

  1. #856
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hillside. (carn the sharks)
    Posts
    3,906
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by G-Mo77 View Post
    It's not just me then. Every time I see him I think of George McFly.
    Me too. The resemblance is uncanny that you could say that it's actually the same person. But of course the time lines don't line up to be him unless he had access to a time machine...wait what
    They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
    Brian Fantana.

  2. #857
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,529
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Geelong have confirmed they are interested in Ceglar if Fort moves to Brisbane.

  3. #858
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    1,210
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    With Port getting Finlayson hopefully they'll give up Ladhams easier
    "Its always good to win the Ashes test match'' - Libba, AFL Grand Final, 2016

  4. Likes Ghost Dog liked this post
  5. #859
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    60,880
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vred View Post
    With Port getting Finlayson hopefully they'll give up Ladhams easier
    They want a first rounder for Ladhams. Hawks have pulled out.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  6. #860
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,052
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vred View Post
    With Port getting Finlayson hopefully they'll give up Ladhams easier
    Is Ladhams physical and strong enough for a number 1 ruck?
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  7. #861
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,822
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by azabob View Post
    Is Ladhams physical and strong enough for a number 1 ruck?
    Not imo. He is similiar to English in that he covers the ground well and can find the ball, but is not a dominant hitout ruck.

    I do think he is better than English in the ruck, and is more aggressive although lacks the size to do much with it. English is more talented around the ground and more composed with ball in hand.

    I'd rate Ladhams as a 6/10 in hitouts (English is maybe a 3).
    I should leave it alone but you're not right

  8. #862
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,682
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Ladhams is more aggressive and quite mobile. The building blocks are there but it seems other clubs aren't chasing him particularly hard. I do wonder if the off-field rumours are putting other clubs off.
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  9. #863
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,739
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by soupman View Post
    Not imo. He is similiar to English in that he covers the ground well and can find the ball, but is not a dominant hitout ruck.

    I do think he is better than English in the ruck, and is more aggressive although lacks the size to do much with it. English is more talented around the ground and more composed with ball in hand.

    I'd rate Ladhams as a 6/10 in hitouts (English is maybe a 3).
    Ladhams is plenty big enough for a number 1 ruck role and has only played 20 something games behind Lycett. I agree he's not worth a first rounder but is Port Adelaide posturing here? I'm not sure what we have that could satisfy them but surely a second rounder is reasonable. I wonder if we've spoken to him.

  10. #864
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,502
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Being reported that Sweet will stay on a 2 year deal.

  11. Thanks G-Mo77, josie thanked for this post
    Likes Bulldog4life liked this post
  12. #865
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,025
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Jon Ralph reporting that we will keep Sweet on a multi-year deal - which to me indicates that he must be getting upgraded to the main list?

    It could be a good result if he is upgraded, we bring in a Ceglar or Lynch, and Stef is downgraded to a rookie spot.

  13. Thanks josie thanked for this post
  14. #866
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,806
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Xerri has requested a trade to Stkilda.

  15. #867
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    E.J. Whitten Stand
    Posts
    17,162
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by divvydan View Post
    Being reported that Sweet will stay on a 2 year deal.
    Sanity prevails.
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

  16. #868
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    9,365
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by divvydan View Post
    Being reported that Sweet will stay on a 2 year deal.
    Oh hallelujah!!!

  17. #869
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,207
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    If Sweet is staying, it would seem unlikely we'll go for Lynch.

    I don't know anything about Lynch but on profile it sounds like he would be worth discussing.

    Would we prefer Lynch or Ceglar? I would have said both and lose Sweet, but if the latter is staying it seems one or the other. Ceglar likely to give us more in 2022, but beyond that?
    W00F!

  18. #870
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,739
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Well Ruck Me.

    Quote Originally Posted by divvydan View Post
    Being reported that Sweet will stay on a 2 year deal.
    Good obvioiusly been told he's gonna have sufficient ruck minutes to keep him next year.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •