-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Perhaps we should've played Prudden against Carlton so we could've dropped him this week? ;-) somebody could always just fudge the team sheet and backdate it right?
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Ins : Hamling, Roughhead
Outs: Roberts, Prudden & Selwood
I'm paying money, the girl's happy, she's got no money, I got my rocks off, how good is this...
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
I can't see us swinging the axe too much after that.
In: Roughy, Hamling
Out: Roberts, Stevens (inj)
We lose a runner in Stevens but Prudden & JJ can play midfield to compensate for the run. Morris & Hamling can play short if need be
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
There may be a few outs due to fatigue - pretty taxing game with the conditions and we may need to freshen up the 22.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
The Bulldogs Bite
There may be a few outs due to fatigue - pretty taxing game with the conditions and we may need to freshen up the 22.
Thinking that too... Nice that we have probably 6 to 8 players who could come in and contribute.
Now that Crameri has had a couple of games for Footscray, he needs to come back in... His ability to get up and down the ground will be very useful against Geelong.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
Mofra
We lose a runner in Stevens but Prudden & JJ can play midfield to compensate for the run
I'm not keen on that, we got beaten in the clearances last week and need to add a genuine mid. I still think Matthew Boyd is the man
If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.
Formerly gogriff
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
boydogs
I'm not keen on that, we got beaten in the clearances last week and need to add a genuine mid. I still think Matthew Boyd is the man
Why? He was cooked as a midfielder last year.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
Mantis
Why? He was cooked as a midfielder last year.
I think Boyd should be plan B as he was against Melb and got us back in the game
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
Mantis
Why?
Because we're really scraping the barrel with the other options - Jong after 1 OK game back in the VFL, Pearce off the rookie list, Prudden 2nd game moved from defense
Originally Posted by
Mantis
He was cooked as a midfielder last year.
He's having a good year this year and we need him in the middle as we have better options to replace him in defense than we do to come in for Stevens
If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.
Formerly gogriff
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
boydogs
Because we're really scraping the barrel with the other options - Jong after 1 OK game back in the VFL, Pearce off the rookie list, Prudden 2nd game moved from defense
He's having a good year this year and we need him in the middle as we have better options to replace him in defense than we do to come in for Stevens
Boyd has found his spot in the backline. We have options for the midfield which are preferable.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
bornadog
We have options for the midfield which are preferable.
Who are you thinking?
If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.
Formerly gogriff
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Is Jong fit, if so I would bring him for Koby
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
boydogs
Who are you thinking?
I thought our midfield did a great job on the weekend without having to chuck Boyd in the middle.
I just think Boyd is passed it as a midfielder. He is playing fantastic football off the HBF and really gels with Wood, Murphy and JJ. I would n't want to break that up.
If Stevens misses, then perhaps Jong has to come in.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
The Bulldogs Bite
There may be a few outs due to fatigue - pretty taxing game with the conditions and we may need to freshen up the 22.
What was taxing about the conditions? They were perfect.
Think our selections need to be based on match ups this week. Roughy to come in for Roberts and play on Hawkins. Don't expect any other changes....as Talia is a better plan B for Hawkins than Hamling. Hoping Stevens comes up.
I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong
Originally Posted by
always right
What was taxing about the conditions? They were perfect.
Think our selections need to be based on match ups this week. Roughy to come in for Roberts and play on Hawkins. Don't expect any other changes....as Talia is a better plan B for Hawkins than Hamling. Hoping Stevens comes up.
I think Crameri will come in this week. He was outstanding last week in the VFL.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.