Thanks Thanks:  4
Likes Likes:  47
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 93
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Do the crime, do the time. It sucks, I feel for the guy, but on the other hand I feel more for the sport, and that's the important issue here.

  2. Likes AndrewP6, kruder liked this post
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,397
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    I do feel for the players, given the lengthy drawn out process and the harsh punishment some 3 or so years later. They've suffered quite a bit already, it surprises me a little that they got whacked with this. Although I do think it's justified too, if that makes sense.

    From our perspective, it's a big loss. Can only imagine how Stew must be feeling, will be a very very challenging year for him. I don't like that the players can't be around the club - should have been some slack given here - their welfare is important and outcasting them (particularly those at other clubs) is wrong.

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,478
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Feel sorry for him but he really should have taken the plea when offered.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Stuck in the middle with you
    Posts
    8,201
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Tough for him, but for sport it is the right result. We knew the risk when we picked him up.
    [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    List-wise, I think we've got the coverage for Stew. We should really only be concerned with his welfare. He can't be around the club in a professional capacity, I'm sure the boys can get around him and ensure he's kept in the family. Jake Stringer is on Twitter this morning voicing his support for his "brother", and I'd be confident he'd have many others as well all looking out for him.

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,210
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    I hope the club does everything possible to look after his personal welfare away from footy. Come 2017, he will be cherry ripe to help us in our quest to go back-to-back.

  8. Likes BornInDroopSt'54, Drunken Bum liked this post
  9. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,558
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    We can replace him with a rookie immediately. Adcock I imagine.

    Wouldn't mind Jarrad Grant about now somewhere on the list. But I digress.

    Who takes the spot, Redpath or Roughead resting forward? Roberts?
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  10. Likes Sedat, bornadog liked this post
  11. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,670
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Bombers allowed to sign 10 new players and granted extra TPP ( Salary Cap ). Dogs, Saints, Power, Melbourne allowed rookie upgrade.

  12. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Should have taken the plea .
    Cronulla did,and the players would still be copping flak regardless of taking the plea or not.
    I'd guarantee fans would still be taking shots at the players .

  13. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    9,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    Bombers allowed to sign 10 new players and granted extra TPP ( Salary Cap ). Dogs, Saints, Power, Melbourne allowed rookie upgrade.
    We should be allowed to sign one as well.

  14. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,558
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by G-Mo77 View Post
    We should be allowed to sign one as well.
    Exactly. Good point.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  15. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by G-Mo77 View Post
    We should be allowed to sign one as well.
    I agree. Port must be livid, they've lost 2 from their list. They did take the chance (with Ryder at least) but still would've expected to at least replace with a rookie. How is it that the club who are responsible will have a full list numerically next year, but others won't?

  16. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    9,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by PeanutsPeanuts View Post
    I agree. Port must be livid, they've lost 2 from their list. They did take the chance (with Ryder at least) but still would've expected to at least replace with a rookie. How is it that the club who are responsible will have a full list numerically next year, but others won't?
    Yep. That's what pisses me off. We're one down from a list number perspective. Port 2 down and Saints, Dees in the same boat. We also lose our welfare officer.

  17. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In renovator's dreams
    Posts
    6,314
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by PeanutsPeanuts View Post
    I agree. Port must be livid, they've lost 2 from their list. They did take the chance (with Ryder at least) but still would've expected to at least replace with a rookie. How is it that the club who are responsible will have a full list numerically next year, but others won't?
    Essendon had 12 players suspended, will replace with 10 is my understanding.
    We're pretty thin for numbers with Smith and Smith out of action and Lynch and Goetz exceptionally green. Although it would take a pretty disastrous injury run to get there.
    Park that car
    Drop that phone
    Sleep on the floor
    Dream about me

  18. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,376
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by G-Mo77 View Post
    Yep. That's what pisses me off. We're one down from a list number perspective. Port 2 down and Saints, Dees in the same boat. We also lose our welfare officer.
    Saints have paid dearly for Carlisle
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •