Thanks Thanks:  4
Likes Likes:  47
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 93
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by The Underdog View Post
    Essendon had 12 players suspended, will replace with 10 is my understanding.
    We're pretty thin for numbers with Smith and Smith out of action and Lynch and Goetz exceptionally green. Although it would take a pretty disastrous injury run to get there.
    OK. That's fairer at least. Jeez what kind of a rabble are they going to be?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,558
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by PeanutsPeanuts View Post
    OK. That's fairer at least. Jeez what kind of a rabble are they going to be?
    But spare a thought for the state league teams whose premiership attempt could be less likely with a very good player or two poached for a drug cheating afl club. We can say that now without being sued, drug cheating afl club.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  3. Likes Drunken Bum, WBFC4FFC, 1eyedog liked this post
  4. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    9,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Saints have paid dearly for Carlisle
    Haven't they ever. We dodged a massive bullet there.

  5. Likes N/A liked this post
  6. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine
    Posts
    6,278
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by PeanutsPeanuts View Post
    I agree. Port must be livid, they've lost 2 from their list. They did take the chance (with Ryder at least) but still would've expected to at least replace with a rookie. How is it that the club who are responsible will have a full list numerically next year, but others won't?
    If Essendon can sign up 10 players - doesn't that mean they will be 2 short (seeing as they have 12 suspended players) ?

    Essendon & Port will be 2 short.
    Dogs, Saints, Dees will be one short.

    Pretty logical really. They have kept Essendon 2 short so that they are at least equal in list numbers to the next most affected club.
    Collingwood, St.Kilda and Freo haven't been able to sign new players when they had players banned. I don't see why we should be able to. Its understandable that Essendon will have to top up their list in order to compete (however poorly) in the AFL.

  7. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,558
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozza View Post
    If Essendon can sign up 10 players - doesn't that mean they will be 2 short (seeing as they have 12 suspended players) ?

    Essendon & Port will be 2 short.
    Dogs, Saints, Dees will be one short.

    Pretty logical really. They have kept Essendon 2 short so that they are at least equal in list numbers to the next most affected club.
    Collingwood, St.Kilda and Freo haven't been able to sign new players when they had players banned. I don't see why we should be able to. Its understandable that Essendon will have to top up their list in order to compete (however poorly) in the AFL.
    They also get to upgrade all 5 rookies instantly.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  8. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Frankston
    Posts
    4,693
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Thank God that justice is done and Essendon will now go down in history as drug cheats. What a despicable crime against the sport and the competition they committed. Greedy a_holes. The players can take a year off and travel the world, develop other skills for post retirement and rest their professional bodies to prolong their careers. Congratulations to Stewie for parachuting out of that toxic environment and coming to its antithesis.
    Footscray Football Republic.

  9. Likes Max469 liked this post
  10. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,624
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    From the Herald Sun:

    Lawyers for former Bombers Stewart Crameri and Brent Prismall are exploring options for an appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal or the Victorian or NSW Supreme Court.

    It could be launched within days.
    EX-BOMBERS PREPARE TO LAUNCH APPEAL

    Crameri and Prismall are now at the Western Bulldogs, represented by a separate legal team to their former teammates.

    Grounds for an appeal must demonstrate an error of law or breach of the rules of procedural fairness.

    It is believed revelations in the CAS judgement that the panel was split 2-1 could be used as a basis for an appeal.

    The Dogs said this afternoon: “The Western Bulldogs have received a copy of the Arbitral Award delivered by the Court of Arbitration for Sport this morning. The club is intently studying the reasons for judgement insofar as they apply to Stewart Crameri and Brent Prismall.”

    The Swiss Federal Tribunal is the highest court in Switzerland, where the CAS is based, but because the case was heard in Australia the Supreme Court is another option for players keen to continue fighting.

    An appeal could involve attempts to freeze the suspensions imposed by the CAS this morning.

  11. Likes Twodogs liked this post
  12. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    5,361
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Somebody please send a message to the club to immediately cease any idea to appeal.

  13. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Yarraville
    Posts
    9,882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    It's misrepresenting the findings to declare it a 2-1 verdict. All three judges unanimously agreed they were comfortably satisfied players were injected with TB4. One judge didn't agree that every one of the 34 were guilty, rather only a selection of them, that was the only discrepancy.
    Western Bulldogs: We exist to win premierships

  14. Likes Drunken Bum, Topdog liked this post
  15. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,558
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringer View Post
    Somebody please send a message to the club to immediately cease any idea to appeal.
    I don't want our club creating a circus like the drug cheating afl team did. It pains me to say it, but he was offered a slap on the wrist and risked copping a big ban. He bet big and lost.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,210
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Greystache View Post
    It's misrepresenting the findings to declare it a 2-1 verdict. All three judges unanimously agreed they were comfortably satisfied players were injected with TB4. One judge didn't agree that every one of the 34 were guilty, rather only a selection of them, that was the only discrepancy.
    This has been going on since Feb 2013.

  17. Likes Greystache liked this post
  18. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Yarraville
    Posts
    9,882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    This has been going on since Feb 2013.
    I'm shocked to hear you say this. I just didn't see it coming
    Western Bulldogs: We exist to win premierships

  19. Likes Sedat liked this post
  20. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    17,716
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Will just have to cop it sweet. Stweart is an important part of our forward line so its a big blow for us. In then end ultimately the right result for the game came out today.

    Bloody Hird and Dank!
    Last edited by Eastdog; 12-01-2016 at 09:38 PM.
    "Footscray people are incredible people; so humble. I'm just so happy - ecstatic"

  21. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    3,633
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by Greystache View Post
    It's misrepresenting the findings to declare it a 2-1 verdict. All three judges unanimously agreed they were comfortably satisfied players were injected with TB4. One judge didn't agree that every one of the 34 were guilty, rather only a selection of them, that was the only discrepancy.
    Anyone know more details on the above?

    I'd think Gordon will have close look at possible legal grounds by Crameri and Prismall's lawyers and whether they appeal to WADA against finding or not. I recall that they were lawyers with close connections to our esteemed president too.

  22. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,624
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: One year ban for Crameri

    Quote Originally Posted by josie View Post
    Anyone know more details on the above?

    I'd think Gordon will have close look at possible legal grounds by Crameri and Prismall's lawyers and whether they appeal to WADA against finding or not. I recall that they were lawyers with close connections to our esteemed president too.
    You are correct - it was Rob Stary that Crameri & Prismall engaged. I assume it is still him or his firm that are acting for them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •