-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
Remi Moses
Ambulance chasers . Feels like I'm reading an Andrew Bolt article
Originally Posted by
Greystache
What a valuable contribution. Perhaps should could draw upon your incredible intellect and business experience to enlighten the WOOF community as to the situation at S&G?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 4 Likes
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
I know someone who works at one of the firms, and take umbrage at being referred to as an "ambulance chaser" .
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
hujsh
Shows plenty of character ( or lack of it)to hide behind the anonymity of an Internet forum to personally insult a fellow poster.
( I'll leave it at that)
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
But there is the "no win, no fee" (but if you win, we'll take most of it) business strategy...
Officially on the Bus-wagon
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon has avoided bankruptcy by reaching an 11th-hour agreement with its bankers.
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon has avoided bankruptcy by reaching an 11th-hour agreement with its bankers.
They've blown it all out of proportion. Can't you see what they're are doing? 'Embattled'. Take out the words 'embattled' and 'respected magistrate'.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Current share price
.6 Have been as high as 6.75 this year, Embattled is polite!
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Is that point six of one cent?
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
6 cents I would say .. Now they have survived maybe a good idea to snatch a heap up.
Bring back the biff
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
ledge
6 cents I would say .. Now they have survived maybe a good idea to snatch a heap up.
I remember saying something similar when Jamie Packer & Lachie Murdoch bought OneTel when it was about to head to bankruptcy. 'They wouldn't save a dying company, not with their pedigree. And it's dirt cheap'... Turns out they both lost a billion or so each. Lucky I invested a small amount in a small mining company than went 6-8 multiple over night about two months after I got them. They've also got Maurice Blackburn commencing a class action to try to destroy their brand and tie up their resources. Just as long as they have enough cash to keep sponsoring us that's all that really matters!
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
ledge
6 cents I would say .. Now they have survived maybe a good idea to snatch a heap up.
May be a bit late unfortunately. The share price doubled from $0.30 to hit over $0.60 yesterday after the deal with the banks. Back to $0.56 now.
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
Is that point six of one cent?
0.01 dollars = 1 cent
"Footscray people are incredible people; so humble. I'm just so happy - ecstatic"
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
Eastdog
0.01 dollars = 1 cent
You don't say!
Read my post above, T&T meant $0.60 (60 cents using your formula)
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
You don't say!
Read my post above, T&T meant $0.60 (60 cents using your formula
)
Am I confused Axe Man yes $0.60 is basically 60 cents which is 40 cents less than 1 dollar. Thats mean $0.10 is 10 cents.
"Footscray people are incredible people; so humble. I'm just so happy - ecstatic"
-
Re: Embattled law firm Slater and Gordon pulls Western Bulldogs sponsorship
Originally Posted by
Eastdog
Am I confused Axe Man yes $0.60 is basically 60 cents which is 40 cents less than 1 dollar. Thats mean $0.10 is 10 cents.
Inside your head must be a wondrous place Eastdog!
I feel like your whole account may be an elaborate hoax, but here goes anyway.
T&T said that Slater's share price is .6
Twodogs asked if that meant $0.006
Ledge speculated that it meant $0.06
In fact T&T meant $0.60
Got it?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks, 3 Likes