-
Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
If you were on the Bulldogs match committee what changes would you make for our round 18 2016 match against St. Kilda at Etihad?
As always a brief explanation for your changes would add a lot of value to the discussion.
"Footscray people are incredible people; so humble. I'm just so happy - ecstatic"
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Hard to tell with injuries.
Libba should come in.
Stringer looks like he might be out. Gotta be smart and look after him long term. Clay Smith talked about getting on the bike at half time, he might pull up sore.
If Stringer and Clay Smith are out, it will be interesting to see who we bring in. The two next in line are Honeychurch and Webb but both are primarily inside mids, as is Libba. It could be an opportunity to bring in Hamling.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Dahl, Hrovat, Mclean, Williams & Adams still injured.
In: Libba
Out: Dunkley
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Dahl, Hrovat, Mclean, Williams & Adams still injured.
In: Libba
Out: Dunkley
Josh Dunkley's game...
27 disposals @ 85% efficiency
7 marks
4 tackles
It would be as harsh as it gets to drop him after his first game back with that performance.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Originally Posted by
Rocco Jones
Josh Dunkley's game...
27 disposals @ 85% efficiency
7 marks
4 tackles
It would be as harsh as it gets to drop him after his first game back with that performance.
Libba comes back, that's the no brainer. It was between Dunks & Jong for me for omission. Very easily go the other way too.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Libba comes back, that's the no brainer. It was between Dunks & Jong for me for omission. Very easily go the other way too.
Stringer might miss, Clay a chance too.
If they are both right, I would go with Jong out. Harsh on him too.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Originally Posted by
Rocco Jones
Stringer might miss, Clay a chance too.
If they are both right, I would go with Jong out. Harsh on him too.
Isn't it great weighing up harsh calls? As opposed, to naming Austin, Young &/or Markovic from week to week.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Isn't it great weighing up harsh calls? As opposed, to naming Austin, Young &/or Markovic from week to week.
Yep! Imagine if we ever get to field a 22 that's near full strength.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Happy enough fro Stringer to take a rest. He's clearly hurt and didn't perform well tonight in any sense so a rest might be in order.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Originally Posted by
Rocco Jones
Stringer might miss, Clay a chance too.
If they are both right, I would go with Jong out. Harsh on him too.
If Stringer was to play can Redpath hold his spot?
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
I think Bevo wants to try the two talls for a few weeks was the impression I got from the interview before the game.
Out Stringer
In Libba
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
If Stringer was to play can Redpath hold his spot?
I don't get the pressure on Redpath holding his spot. We have been playing too many inside mids and need forward targets. Before tonight, he averaged more goals, more contested marks and more inside 50 marks than any other Bulldog.
Tonight he had 8 marks, 5 inside 50. He also had 8 score involvements, one of the highest in the game.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
I like having two big forwards, and our assortment of other options. I hope it continues to work. The only forward struggling would be Dicko I reckon.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 18 2016 vs St. Kilda
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
I like having two big forwards, and our assortment of other options. I hope it continues to work. The only forward struggling would be Dicko I reckon.
As long as they are decent, it is much better to go with a permanent tall forward + 2nd ruck who is primarily a forward.
So far this season, Redpath stats wise looks like:
- Just over 2 goals a game= 45-50 goals a year: TICK
- Averaging a tick under 2 contested marks a game, best at the Bulldogs: TICK
- Near elite inside 50 marks, top handful in league: MASSIVE TICK
Tom Boyd is our only real 2nd ruck option IMO. Much better for our structure than playing 2 ruckmen.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes