I always thought Paul Roos was a backman who ventured forward from his backline position. He'd might kick a goal or two but at the same time was laxed in the covering of his opposition forward.
I don't think you could ever call him a forward.
I always thought Paul Roos was a backman who ventured forward from his backline position. He'd might kick a goal or two but at the same time was laxed in the covering of his opposition forward.
I don't think you could ever call him a forward.
Peter Foster was a bloke who could play either end with ease. Got picked as a centre half back and as a centre half forward for the Vics.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
Foster started as a CHF with Fitzroy who turned into a gun CHB. He was OK at CHF as a pinch-hitter but I always thought he was a dud CHF whenever he tried to play a full game there. If he played for Victoria as a CHF I would be amazed.
Paul Roos was just a very good player who could play anywhere but his best spot was definately CHB.
Lets think about this from the other position aswell.
Typically, players that play OK up forward do well down back.
But what about the Exceptional forwards, such as Fevola, J.Brown and N.Riewoldt? There is not much to go off, but i could not see any of the three being standout defenders.