Thanks Thanks:  18
Likes Likes:  108
Page 2 of 30 FirstFirst 123456789101112 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 440
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,163
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    Agree, and I was in seat 1A of the Schulz bandwagon while he was still spudding it up at Richmond. He's done like a dinner.
    They got some good years out of him, but agree with your assessment.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,363
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Apparently on SEN this arvo it was mentioned if a good offer came into Geelong for Steve Motlop they're open to trading him (presumably to get back into the draft this year at a good point).
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  3. Likes azabob liked this post
  4. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,163
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    Apparently on SEN this arvo it was mentioned if a good offer came into Geelong for Steve Motlop they're open to trading him (presumably to get back into the draft this year at a good point).
    Again, no thanks
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,876
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    Apparently on SEN this arvo it was mentioned if a good offer came into Geelong for Steve Motlop they're open to trading him (presumably to get back into the draft this year at a good point).
    The blokes about as consistent as tattslotto might get one minor win every 15 weeks

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,363
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Mark Stevens just said Ty Vickery is leaving Richmond.

    My assumption is someone will offer him enough that Richmond's free agency compo is a second rounder. Around 24.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    Mark Stevens just said Ty Vickery is leaving Richmond.

    My assumption is someone will offer him enough that Richmond's free agency compo is a second rounder. Around 24.
    Carlton.

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Western Suburbs
    Posts
    5,972
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    Mark Stevens just said Ty Vickery is leaving Richmond.

    My assumption is someone will offer him enough that Richmond's free agency compo is a second rounder. Around 24.
    I reckon Hawthorn back themselves in to turn him into a role player. I think they're going to be in for some pain continually going back to the mature-age well

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,755
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by lemmon View Post
    I reckon Hawthorn back themselves in to turn him into a role player. I think they're going to be in for some pain continually going back to the mature-age well
    Could a guy that averages 1.5-2 goals a game not potentially thrive in a more successful team as the 2nd optionforward and part time ruck?

    I don't watch Richmond closely (or ever really) but I can envisage a player like that doing well with us and even moreso at the Hawks

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,363
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    Could a guy that averages 1.5-2 goals a game not potentially thrive in a more successful team as the 2nd optionforward and part time ruck?

    I don't watch Richmond closely (or ever really) but I can envisage a player like that doing well with us and even moreso at the Hawks
    I agree. I'm really warming to the idea now. A defined role player who can kick 1-2 goals a game and be a decent second ruck option, leaving Tom at full forward, sounds like something to consider. Especially since he costs nothing but salary. I think he's very much like the North Melbourne version of David Hale, who ended up a premiership player.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,987
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    I had the same thought with davd hale comparison. Hale could not get a game at north, and for what ever reason was not
    in favour with Laidley, they played a younger Goldstein ahead of him! But look how damaging he was in the lead up to the finals ? he played his role succinctly . I think the limited interchange would show up his limited endurance

    I remember vickery kicked 3 goals in the first quarter against Carlton a few years ago, so he obviously had talent
    Last edited by macca; 28-08-2016 at 01:43 PM.

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,363
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Watching Vardy run around WO on the VFL TV game today, and he looks decidedly average if it's not delivered on a silver platter. With out entries into forward 50, I'd be concerned with this being replicated especially in a quicker and higher pressure level up.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,363
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by macca View Post
    I had the same thought with davd hale comparison. Hale could not get a game at north, and for what ever reason was not
    in favour with Laidley, they played a younger Goldstein ahead of him! But look how damaging he was in the lead up to the finals ? he played his role succinctly . I think the limited interchange would show up his limited endurance

    I remember vickery kicked 3 goals in the first quarter against Carlton a few years ago, so he obviously had talent
    Looking at his profile, he's 200cm & 100kg and fairly mobile. Averages 1.3 goals a game, kicked a bag of 6 last year, and hasn't been overly used as the second ruck with Maric, Griffiths & Hampson. If he was turned into the genuine #2 ruck and resting forward and could break even or win while in there and keep up 1-2 goals a game that's a great result for us. Better yet we can leave Boyd forward, or ruck him if we lose a ruckman in game and/or have two 200cm/100kg targets up forward to mark or bring it to ground. The more and more I think about it, the more I find this appealing over Cloke (as well as free agent status for us).
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,163
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    Looking at his profile, he's 200cm & 100kg and fairly mobile. Averages 1.3 goals a game, kicked a bag of 6 last year, and hasn't been overly used as the second ruck with Maric, Griffiths & Hampson. If he was turned into the genuine #2 ruck and resting forward and could break even or win while in there and keep up 1-2 goals a game that's a great result for us. Better yet we can leave Boyd forward, or ruck him if we lose a ruckman in game and/or have two 200cm/100kg targets up forward to mark or bring it to ground. The more and more I think about it, the more I find this appealing over Cloke (as well as free agent status for us).
    The other thing I like about Vickery is he is 26 years old so has lots of footy left in him. He should be at his peak as a tall.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Vickery as a free agent is a no brainer. Can't see anyone else in the market who's going to fill a very specific need so neatly. He won't be a superstar or a saviour, but he can ruck, is mobile, can contest around the ground and take inside 50 contested marks.

  16. Thanks bulldogtragic thanked for this post
  17. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    9,113
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Players On The Market 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by PeanutsPeanuts View Post
    Vickery as a free agent is a no brainer. Can't see anyone else in the market who's going to fill a very specific need so neatly. He won't be a superstar or a saviour, but he can ruck, is mobile, can contest around the ground and take inside 50 contested marks.
    He's gotta get a short back and sides though. That haircut is deplorable.

  18. Likes bulldogtragic liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •