-
17-10-2016, 06:28 PM
#316
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
Really? Crameri, Stringer, Cordy... Don't you mean a lively small forward ala. Cameron?
I mean that a key forward who is more mobile than average suits us more than the gorilla types because we can keep our pressure high. Cordy is an example of a rough extra defensive version of that.
-
17-10-2016, 06:35 PM
#317
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Thanks hujsh I agree which is why Cloke needs to drop kg.
It's incredibly slow going. 10 trades done after 44 done last year.
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.
-
17-10-2016, 06:42 PM
#318
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
Ozza
Think X Richards has some potential.
Has some good pace and athleticism - 196cms. Bit to work with there. Was really good in their final v Adelaide.
I like him and would play him back. Similar build and athletic profile as Hammer.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
17-10-2016, 06:52 PM
#319
Re: Players On The Market 2016
I'm hearing that GWS are happy to offload Palmer to free up salary cap space.
So why are stupid clubs like Carlton helping them with this? The rest of the competition, and this includes Carlton, is better off making GWS keep players like Palmer and have them squeeze out better players. If clubs keep helping them, on top of all the rich draft concessions they have been getting, what chance does anyone have?
Listening to Brahm's 3rd Racket
-
17-10-2016, 07:31 PM
#320
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
The Doctor
I'm hearing that GWS are happy to offload Palmer to free up salary cap space.
So why are stupid clubs like Carlton helping them with this? The rest of the competition, and this includes Carlton, is better off making GWS keep players like Palmer and have them squeeze out better players. If clubs keep helping them, on top of all the rich draft concessions they have been getting, what chance does anyone have?
I have a theory that SOS is on a bonus system where if GWS win a flag in the next 5 years he gets a million dollar bonus.
There has to be a reason why he seems hellbent on topping up their draft picks.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
17-10-2016, 07:32 PM
#321
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Is Xavier Richards worth considering as a developing forward?
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
17-10-2016, 07:34 PM
#322
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Is Xavier Richards worth considering as a developing forward?
I think he is worth chasing as a developing tall - forward or back.
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
17-10-2016, 07:36 PM
#323
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
azabob
I think he is worth chasing as a developing tall - forward or back.
Certainly a good size, 195cm and 91kg. Moves pretty well too. I can't imagine he'd cost too much either.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
17-10-2016, 08:30 PM
#324
Re: Players On The Market 2016
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
17-10-2016, 08:39 PM
#325
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
redders70
XFactor Richards
Only 23 and a Sandy Dragons boy too.
Surely he must be Homesick by now
Would absolutely take him as you say Aza as a developing forward or back.
Get it done BT
Sounds a bit like a Hamling replacement, size & agility wise although he can play forward too, later bloomer and played in the 2016 Grand Final.
Maybe a three way trade: Hamling, Richards & something to Sydney.
Leave it to me Redders.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
17-10-2016, 10:30 PM
#326
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
The Doctor
I'm hearing that GWS are happy to offload Palmer to free up salary cap space.
So why are stupid clubs like Carlton helping them with this? The rest of the competition, and this includes Carlton, is better off making GWS keep players like Palmer and have them squeeze out better players. If clubs keep helping them, on top of all the rich draft concessions they have been getting, what chance does anyone have?
They are exploring doing it so the price in terms of a draft pick required for Marchbank is much less - they won't give up pick 5 and are exploring other ways
-
17-10-2016, 10:38 PM
#327
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Has Lewis Taylor been snapped up yet on his way north of $500,000 a year asking price? Maybe I've missed that post in this thread saying he's off the market.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
18-10-2016, 11:11 AM
#328
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Toby Nankervis has just requested a trade to Richmond - 2 in 2 days for the Bondi Billionaires
"Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"
-
18-10-2016, 11:13 AM
#329
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
Sedat
Toby Nankervis has just requested a trade to Richmond - 2 in 2 days for the Bondi Billionaires
And Mitchell gone. Such a shame...
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
18-10-2016, 11:22 AM
#330
Re: Players On The Market 2016
Originally Posted by
Sedat
Toby Nankervis has just requested a trade to Richmond - 2 in 2 days for the Bondi Billionaires
Has me bemused the amount of players nominating Richmond, Carlton and other poor sides, they seriously mustn't rate themselves being able to break into a decent side.
It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes