Thanks Thanks:  42
Likes Likes:  130
Page 16 of 54 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314151617181920212223242526 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 240 of 801
  1. #226
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by ledge View Post
    Wouldn't be letting HC or Webb go they are both ready to perform next year , HC was starting to get comfortable just got a health issue.
    Webb also got a feel this year at the end.
    More of a give the kids a go year and prepare them for next year it seemed.
    HC I see as a forward pocket mid.
    Webb to be a mid forward pocket.

    I think they want Webb off a HBF distributing the ball ledge. Although why they bring him into the AFL team and play him anywhere but the spot he plays in the VFL team is beyond me.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  2. #227
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,649
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Honeychurch simply doesn't hurt the opposition on the scoreboard.

    Webb, for some reason, looks like a fish out of water in the seniors. There must be a reason why he doesn't get picked despite excellent VFL form. Maybe he finds the transition to hard or plays too much within himself. not sure. Certainly has the ability.
    Listening to Brahm's 3rd Racket

  3. #228
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,954
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by Twodogs View Post
    I think they want Webb off a HBF distributing the ball ledge. Although why they bring him into the AFL team and play him anywhere but the spot he plays in the VFL team is beyond me.
    Whatever they do it seems silly to groom someone for two three years then when they look like making it to turf them.
    Hamilton to me is obviously not going to make it though.
    Bring back the biff

  4. #229
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by ledge View Post
    Whatever they do it seems silly to groom someone for two three years then when they look like making it to turf them.
    Hamilton to me is obviously not going to make it though.

    Agreed. But if I were Webb I would ask for a transfer anyway.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  5. #230
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,253
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by The Doctor View Post
    My view is we keep all remaining players from our premiership team. There is still 20 of them and thats good enough for another premiership crack. We just have to get their heads right and their bodies right. But the ability has been proven so we should keep it.

    I would let go

    Honeychurch
    Webb
    Hamilton
    Crameri

    Cloke (retain if Redpath goes)

    Boyd - retired
    Murphy - retired

    So that would be 7 from the primary list.
    Agree Doc, but I would like to see Crameri retained. Cloke has a contract for another year and we should honour that if he wants to continue.

    I would also drop Campbell, he may be tall but if he is not AFL standard, we have to cut our loss.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  6. #231
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Qld.
    Posts
    9,669
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Agree Doc, but I would like to see Crameri retained. Cloke has a contract for another year and we should honour that if he wants to continue.

    I would also drop Campbell, he may be tall but if he is not AFL standard, we have to cut our loss.
    The way Bevo was talking that if Clokey really wants to play on he will. His heart has got to be in it.

  7. #232
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,253
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog4life View Post
    The way Bevo was talking that if Clokey really wants to play on he will. His heart has got to be in it.
    Yep, I think it comes down to Cloke. I do have a gut feeling he may retire, but that is purely a guess.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  8. #233
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Agree Doc, but I would like to see Crameri retained. Cloke has a contract for another year and we should honour that if he wants to continue.

    I would also drop Campbell, he may be tall but if he is not AFL standard, we have to cut our loss.
    I think Campbell's position will be decided by the trade period. If we can acquire a ready made ruckamn, I would agree that BTC has not quite measured up to AFL standard regularly enough to retain his spot. If we can't, I don't think Roughy and Boyd are physically reliable enough to be our entire stock of ready to go Ruckmen.

  9. #234
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,737
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by PeanutsPeanuts View Post
    I think Campbell's position will be decided by the trade period. If we can acquire a ready made ruckamn, I would agree that BTC has not quite measured up to AFL standard regularly enough to retain his spot. If we can't, I don't think Roughy and Boyd are physically reliable enough to be our entire stock of ready to go Ruckmen.
    Very much so, if we can't find a replacement or two then we need him to stay.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  10. #235
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    You read about Kruezer , but how likely is that? Anyone hear anything more concrete than just the odd word floating around?
    I will never see #16 the same!!

  11. #236
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Did anyone actually read something about Kruezer? I'd like that to be true but just assumed it was only here it was mentioned.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  12. #237
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,737
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by Twodogs View Post
    Did anyone actually read something about Kruezer? I'd like that to be true but just assumed it was only here it was mentioned.
    I think we were interested in him a couple of seasons back and with him out of contract now the door might be ajar.
    I still think it would be unlikely he will leave the Blues
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  13. #238
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    I think we were interested in him a couple of seasons back and with him out of contract now the door might be ajar.
    I still think it would be unlikely he will leave the Blues
    He would be ideal.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  14. #239
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,285
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    I actually think Campbell shows more than Roughead. I think Roughead gets a wide birth at the club because of the good bloke/leader factor which you have to take into account but outside of the finals last year he has just been a player for mine.

  15. #240
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,817
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Moving-Rolling Delisting/Retiring/Trading Thread 2017

    Crameri not offered a new contract. Disappointed. Wouldn't he have some sort of trade currency?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •