-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Yeah I heard that too. The Guy thinks he is an Essendon life member and has completely shunned the club that gave him an opportunity and where he played 219 games compared to 31 awful games. Can't stand listening to him. Same as Brain fader.
Agree he is not nearly as funny as he thinks he is too. I was in my car listening but usually never listen to Leach or Cooney. Agree on his love for the Bummers too.
-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Cooney can GAGF as far as I'm concerned on this topic. Nothing at you my friend.
He has become a bore
-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Bevo said he has issues he needs to fix , well that's obvious so I'm not sure what Bevo said that was bad.
Bevo also said it was fixable , if that isn't leaving the door open I'm not sure what else he could say to support him.
I'm not sure if Cooney actually read the article from that comment.
Bring back the biff
-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Originally Posted by
bornadog
However, it won't be easy street if he doesn't turn his life around. Whether it is with us or another club, if he wants to be an AFL player, he has to take the next step to being a true professional on and off the field.
So his real choices are yes or no to playing AFL.
It really does have the vibe of an intervention at this point.
BORDERLINE FLYING
-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Yeah I heard that too. The Guy thinks he is an Essendon life member and has completely shunned the club that gave him an opportunity and where he played 219 games compared to 31 awful games. Can't stand listening to him. Same as Brain fader.
I'm with you. Absolute clown of a bloke. Then again, you'd probably defend a fellow player who's been criticised for appalling professionalism and a lack of standards around training and injury rehab. Cooney would know all about that
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Menegola and 20 for Stringer?
Last edited by bulldogsthru&thru; 15-09-2017 at 10:22 PM.
-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Originally Posted by
bornadog
How do you know this?
I'm admiring your tenacity
"It's over. It's all over."
-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
I think Stringer can go to Geelong.
They have bargaining chips.
I know we are getting unders but.....
Stringer in a clean swap for Dangerfield.
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
Heard Cooney have a go at Bevo for what he said about Stringer. Said Stringer couldn't go back now. Said he would like to see him at Essendon. No mention of Stringer stuffing up as he is tight with him.
Yeah it's all Bevo's fault. Cooney = Dickhead
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
-
15-09-2017, 11:15 PM
#100
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
There's a litany of champion footballers who are big dills. Cooney and Stringer can be added to the long list of Carey, Ablett Snr, Martin, Franklin, Cousins, A Jakovich, Carman, Jacko, Capper, Arnold Briedis ...
"I'll give him a hug before the first bounce and then I'll run into my pack and give them orders to rip him apart."
-
15-09-2017, 11:30 PM
#101
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
I'd be happy with Pick 11. Seems right to me.
-
15-09-2017, 11:49 PM
#102
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Cooney is becoming my least favourite good player ever at the Dogs!
Listening to Brahm's 3rd Racket
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
16-09-2017, 03:24 PM
#103
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
IF Stringer is leaving, my preference is a first rounder from next year.
Failing that, I favour another scenario of using this year's trading first rounder to pick up a couple of experienced players e.g. Saad and Crozier. From all reports this draft falls away real quickly in the first round.
Another issue we have is list numbers.We currently have 2 retirements and 1 delisting = 3 spots, less Lynch up grade and Trengove = 1 spot and we have to use at least 2 draft picks (if the third is used on Lynch).
If Stringer goes and we get 2 more in, we still need at least 2 more list spots. I suppose that is where Crameri and Honeychurch come in.
The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.
-
16-09-2017, 03:53 PM
#104
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Originally Posted by
Dry Rot
IF Stringer is leaving, my preference is a first rounder from next year.
Failing that, I favour another scenario of using this year's trading first rounder to pick up a couple of experienced players e.g. Saad and Crozier. From all reports this draft falls away real quickly in the first round.
Another issue we have is list numbers.We currently have 2 retirements and 1 delisting = 3 spots, less Lynch up grade and Trengove = 1 spot and we have to use at least 2 draft picks (if the third is used on Lynch).
If Stringer goes and we get 2 more in, we still need at least 2 more list spots. I suppose that is where Crameri and Honeychurch come in.
I think the minimum change to a list by AFL rules is 4 a year.
But if you delist then redraft them I think It counts as one.
We have lost two through retirement and two delisted , I'm not sure if the rookie list counts.
Does anyone have the rules about list management each year ?
Bring back the biff
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
16-09-2017, 04:27 PM
#105
Re: Stringer Trade Worth
Originally Posted by
Dry Rot
IF Stringer is leaving, my preference is a first rounder from next year.
Failing that, I favour another scenario of using this year's trading first rounder to pick up a couple of experienced players e.g. Saad and Crozier. From all reports this draft falls away real quickly in the first round.
Another issue we have is list numbers.We currently have 2 retirements and 1 delisting = 3 spots, less Lynch up grade and Trengove = 1 spot and we have to use at least 2 draft picks (if the third is used on Lynch).
If Stringer goes and we get 2 more in, we still need at least 2 more list spots. I suppose that is where Crameri and Honeychurch come in.
Every year there seems to be either a draft that has a good top 6 and then falls away or it's a Superdraft (exclamation mark) and every year we get good players from all over the place. We get The Bont at 4 one year, the next year we get Caleb Daniel at 45 and nobody rates Zaine Cordy highly enough to nominate him until the fourth round.
Originally Posted by
ledge
I think the minimum change to a list by AFL rules is 4 a year.
But if you delist then redraft them I think It counts as one.
We have lost two through retirement and two delisted , I'm not sure if the rookie list counts.
Does anyone have the rules about list management each year ?
3 I think. It used to be 3. Rookie list is seperate, you can stay on it 2 years.
But I think the rookie list is about to be merged into the main list isn't it?
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.