Thanks Thanks:  29
Likes Likes:  213
Page 4 of 35 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 525
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    An article on afl.com.au says, from Crameri, he's prepared to play interstate.

    If Brisbane are interested, this helps somewhat.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine
    Posts
    6,269
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    I would be quite concerned about having 2 x 200cm forwards who can't put on pressure. Tempting as it is - Schache is a huge risk and probably not the right fit.

  3. Likes Dry Rot, 1eyedog liked this post
  4. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Today's math for a potential Schache trade:

    Assumption is 11 for Stringer, and pick 27 in play:

    9, 11 & 27 for 18, 19 & 41 and Schache (valued at pick 14)

    Dogs: 18, 19, 39 & 80 (Roarke) with 41 (Crozier, with Honey to GWS) PLUS Schache, Trengove & Crozier --- Campbell & Crameri trades possible
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  5. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Algester, Qld
    Posts
    8,268
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    Today's math for a potential Schache trade:

    Assumption is 11 for Stringer, and pick 27 in play:

    9, 11 & 27 for 18, 19 & 41 and Schache (valued at pick 14)

    Dogs: 18, 19, 39 & 80 (Roarke) with 41 (Crozier, with Honey to GWS) PLUS Schache, Trengove & Crozier --- Campbell & Crameri trades possible
    I think we need a Scache scenario where we keep pick 9, if one is possible.

  6. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Hotel Foxtrot View Post
    I think we need a Scache scenario where we keep pick 9, if one is possible.
    Just as I did that, pick 11 to GWS. So 9 has to be involved if we want Schache unless Jake finds another new home.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  7. #51
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Eastern suburbs
    Posts
    2,069
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozza View Post
    I would be quite concerned about having 2 x 200cm forwards who can't put on pressure. Tempting as it is - Schache is a huge risk and probably not the right fit.
    Tom Boyd's two best games since arriving at the Club, were in the PF and GF of 2016. Hasn't really shown enough to be a key forward of note. Schache's career appeal to date has been more as a key forward.

  8. #52
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,762
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuggety Back Pocket View Post
    Tom Boyd's two best games since arriving at the Club, were in the PF and GF of 2016. Hasn't really shown enough to be a key forward of note. Schache's career appeal to date has been more as a key forward.
    So Schache's 27 games and 25 goals in his first two years shows his potential as a key forward but Boyd's 23 games and 24 goals in his first two years doesn't?

  9. #53
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,729
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    So Schache's 27 games and 25 goals in his first two years shows his potential as a key forward but Boyd's 23 games and 24 goals in his first two years doesn't?
    Schache has had a great development program so far and like you I don't see Boyd in a negative light. I'm not 100% convinced we need Schache but he's certainly worth considering.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  10. Likes hujsh liked this post
  11. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,864
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    So Schache's 27 games and 25 goals in his first two years shows his potential as a key forward but Boyd's 23 games and 24 goals in his first two years doesn't?
    Those were Boyd's 2nd and 3rd years
    If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.

    Formerly gogriff

  12. #55
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,762
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by boydogs View Post
    Those were Boyd's 2nd and 3rd years
    Call me crazy but if he was drafted in 2013 that would make 2014 his first year by my reckoning.
    2014 and 15 he had the stats I posted above
    Attached Images Attached Images
    • File Type: png d.PNG (2.3 KB, 5 views)
    Last edited by hujsh; 12-10-2017 at 10:18 PM.

  13. #56
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,864
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    Call me crazy but if he was drafted in 2013 that would make 2014 his first year buy my reckoning.
    2014 and 15 he had the stats I posted above
    Sorry misread your post, thought you said 23 & 24 goals in his first two years
    If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.

    Formerly gogriff

  14. #57
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,274
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Really interesting that a Pick 2, key position player that has been in the system for 2 years doesn't have clubs jumping all over to take him.

  15. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by kruder View Post
    Really interesting that a Pick 2, key position player that has been in the system for 2 years doesn't have clubs jumping all over to take him.
    One of the clips on the AFEL website a journo said a few clubs are playing it cool, looking to see if they can get him dirt cheap. Hopefully one is us, and we are trying to turn unders for Stringer into unders for Schache for us.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  16. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Western Suburbs
    Posts
    5,974
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozza View Post
    I would be quite concerned about having 2 x 200cm forwards who can't put on pressure. Tempting as it is - Schache is a huge risk and probably not the right fit.
    Bevo and the club seem to prefer Boyd as a ruck anyway. I wonder whether getting Schache would just make that transition permanent.

  17. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,409
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Josh Schache

    Quote Originally Posted by lemmon View Post
    Bevo and the club seem to prefer Boyd as a ruck anyway. I wonder whether getting Schache would just make that transition permanent.
    I'd like to think they can share the duties. Say in total numbers across a 30 minute quarter, Roughy spends 23 minutes in the ruck. Boyd & Schache can take 3.5 minutes each. Or if one is on fire forward, the other can take the ruck time. Or if both are on fire, chuck Trengove in to cover it. It gives us a fair amount of flexibility and gives us two big targets if we can address our kicking inside 50.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •