The Moving/Rolling Trading & Delisting Thread 2018

[Bullies]

Do you think Trengove will make it?

Trengrove will be our Chris Mayne unfortunately.

[bornadog]

Trengrove will be our Chris Mayne unfortunately.

I don't believe it will be that bad. He was brought in as a second ruck/Fwd as our young rucks develop.

[Twodogs]

Trengrove will be our Chris Mayne unfortunately.

We've already had a Jade Rawlings.

[Happy Days]

Anyone interested in De Goey?

He seems like a little bastard but he is also an incredible talent. He's come back from his suspension looking like a Toby Greene clone, and is the sort of player we really need. Plus there's clearly a lot of upside there.

[hujsh]

If he up for trade or out of contract?

[bulldogtragic]

Anyone interested in De Goey?

He seems like a little bastard but he is also an incredible talent. He's come back from his suspension looking like a Toby Greene clone, and is the sort of player we really need. Plus there's clearly a lot of upside there.

How would a trade look?

P.s. Out of contract Hujsh

[bornadog]

How would a trade look?

P.s. Out of contract Hujsh

Cannot see him leaving Collingwood

[bulldogtragic]

Cannot see him leaving Collingwood

I can't see us putting up something worth Collingwood considering it. This year is difficult for us unless a big name leaves us, bigger than a Dahl type.

[Happy Days]

(I swear I already posted this so sorry if it doubles up)

Couldn't we just sign him?

If we have a more attractive offer and he wants to come then realistically, between the tremendous influence of the AFLPA and the general culture around free agency and overcompensation, Collingwood probably won't be able to do much besides bluster to stop it.

It's easy to say "our first pick" but giving up a good first round pick never really works, and developing the best talent from the draft (which you 90% of the time get inside the top 10-15) is always the best way to build a list. If we absolutely have to trade I would want it to be a player/second-pick package (Dunkley/Young/Williams?), but I'd much prefer RFA.

[Ozza]

De Goey is going to be very expensive ($700-$800K a season). Hard to see him leaving the Pies. Kind of owes it to them to sign on again!

Huge talent.

[Yankee Hotel Foxtrot]

(I swear I already posted this so sorry if it doubles up)

Couldn't we just sign him?

If we have a more attractive offer and he wants to come then realistically, between the tremendous influence of the AFLPA and the general culture around free agency and overcompensation, Collingwood probably won't be able to do much besides bluster to stop it.

It's easy to say "our first pick" but giving up a good first round pick never really works, and developing the best talent from the draft (which you 90% of the time get inside the top 10-15) is always the best way to build a list. If we absolutely have to trade I would want it to be a player/second-pick package (Dunkley/Young/Williams?), but I'd much prefer RFA.

DeGoey's not eligible for any form of free agency.

[bulldogtragic]

(I swear I already posted this so sorry if it doubles up)

Couldn't we just sign him?

If we have a more attractive offer and he wants to come then realistically, between the tremendous influence of the AFLPA and the general culture around free agency and overcompensation, Collingwood probably won't be able to do much besides bluster to stop it.

It's easy to say "our first pick" but giving up a good first round pick never really works, and developing the best talent from the draft (which you 90% of the time get inside the top 10-15) is always the best way to build a list. If we absolutely have to trade I would want it to be a player/second-pick package (Dunkley/Young/Williams?), but I'd much prefer RFA.

This is where Dahl is vital this year with RFAs. The key to really abusing free agency to me is to try to eliminate incoming and outgoing agents in the one period. Carlton brought in Daisy Thomas, let go Eddie Betts and got no compo. Far from ideal.

If Dahl is going to sign, then I'd go hard at Gaff. Hard. But if Dahl goes for a first rounder compo, and Gaff's contract is equal or more then there's no compo for us. It's just effectively a trade, not a very good player for no loss. Roughy won't change the free agency needle if he wanted to look around, but Dahl could. So hopefully we are trying to nail things down.

[Happy Days]

DeGoey's not eligible for any form of free agency.

Well there you go.

Guess it would have to be a trade - I'd probably do any of those I outlined.

[Bullies]

Cannot see him leaving Collingwood

He is an absolute gun and will only get better.

[Bullies]

This is where Dahl is vital this year with RFAs. The key to really abusing free agency to me is to try to eliminate incoming and outgoing agents in the one period. Carlton brought in Daisy Thomas, let go Eddie Betts and got no compo. Far from ideal.

If Dahl is going to sign, then I'd go hard at Gaff. Hard. But if Dahl goes for a first rounder compo, and Gaff's contract is equal or more then there's no compo for us. It's just effectively a trade, not a very good player for no loss. Roughy won't change the free agency needle if he wanted to look around, but Dahl could. So hopefully we are trying to nail things down.

I think you maybe over estimating the value of Dahl in free agency. No one showed much interest last year and so not sure they will up the ante this year.