Thanks Thanks:  98
Likes Likes:  1,022
Page 51 of 152 FirstFirst ... 414243444546474849505152535455565758596061101151 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 765 of 2278

Thread: MRO Thread

  1. #751
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,225
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread



    Wasn't sure if it's been posted but just saw it and thought I'd share as it made me chuckle.

  2. #752
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,278
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    The Tribunal chairman, David Jones, says Greene's past record is "totally irrelevant" in relation to this case.

    WTF?
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  3. #753
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,484
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry Rot View Post
    The Tribunal chairman, David Jones, says Greene's past record is "totally irrelevant" in relation to this case.

    WTF?
    He's spot on, the past indiscretions have been dealt with

    I suggest that Adrian Anderson has run rings around the AFL again
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  4. #754
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,278
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    He's spot on, the past indiscretions have been dealt with

    I suggest that Adrian Anderson has run rings around the AFL again
    Disagree.

    In a proper court, you look at the current offence only to establish guilt, then priors for the penalty.
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  5. #755
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,484
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry Rot View Post
    Disagree.

    In a proper court, you look at the current offence only to establish guilt, then priors for the penalty.
    The guilt is what has been challenged and the evidence isn't stronger that the previous week and isn't as clear cut as the Hawkins charge
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  6. #756
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    3,499
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Ban upheld ... Toby gets a rest in the prelim
    WOOF Member 422

  7. #757
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,502
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Ban upheld, Greene to miss prelim final unless he appeals again.

  8. #758
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,890
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Bang! Catcha later Toby ya little turd.
    Have you been reading those Roddy Doyle books again, Dougal!?


    I have, yeah Ted, you big gobshite

  9. #759
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,484
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Scraggers View Post
    Ban upheld ... Toby gets a rest in the prelim
    A week late but it just shows the inconsistent way they deal with things
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  10. #760
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Stuck in the middle with you
    Posts
    8,201
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Brilliant news, you can only flaunt the rules for so long.
    [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

  11. #761
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    3,499
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    A week late but it just shows the inconsistent way they deal with things
    Yep ... incredible. Should have got two weeks minimum last week for a greater indiscretion, but gets one week this time. Who knows the inner workings of the tribunal
    WOOF Member 422

  12. #762
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine
    Posts
    6,245
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Disgraceful decision. Last week much worse, pleads guilty and gets a fine.
    This week, it’s not even clear he did anything worth more than a free and they make it up as they go along and over-correct because of not suspending him last week.
    The giants should absolutely appeal this nonsense.

  13. #763
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,278
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry Rot View Post
    I have a feeling in my waters that Greene WILL be rubbed out.

    He got a ridiculous Get Out of Jail card from the AFL system last week ****ing with Bont's head. Big mea culpa from Greene. Free to play the Lions.

    So the following week he basically thumbs his nose at the AFL and its disciplinary system, and does it again.

    Big test for the AFL. Dont think they will take that shit from Greene.

    He will be rubbed out.
    Dry Rot 1, Toby Greene 0.
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  14. #764
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,225
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozza View Post
    Disgraceful decision. Last week much worse, pleads guilty and gets a fine.
    This week, it’s not even clear he did anything worth more than a free and they make it up as they go along and over-correct because of not suspending him last week.
    The giants should absolutely appeal this nonsense.
    Agree, how you can state the cases are assessed individually then agree with a week in this instance, and a fine the week prior in a much clearer and more serious case is beyond me. I'm in no way defending Greene; I'm scratching my head at this kangaroo court of a tribunal.

  15. #765
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine
    Posts
    6,245
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    Agree, how you can state the cases are assessed individually then agree with a week in this instance, and a fine the week prior in a much clearer and more serious case is beyond me. I'm in no way defending Greene; I'm scratching my head at this kangaroo court of a tribunal.
    Spot on. And like you say, it’s not a defence of Greene. He pleaded guilty last week and they didn’t do their job so are trying to save face this week it seems. It’s not supposed to work that way. Completely unprofessional.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •