Thanks Thanks:  98
Likes Likes:  1,022

Thread: MRO Thread

  1. #1996
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,253
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Seems you are allowed to concuss a player.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  2. #1997
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,240
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Seems you are allowed to concuss a player.
    I don't think you're allowed to 'concuss' a player but it was a marking contest...

    Do I wish Lynch just jumped at the footy? No - but he was not going to mark it...I don't understand the angst. Keath was brave in going back with the flight but to be truthful it also wasn't super clever - HE wasn't going to mark it either. Crozier does this a lot as well - he sticks his head in spots where it is simply going to get knocked off for NO GOOD REASON.

    If your oppo goes. You go. If he doesn't go...you STAY ON HIM (and stay goal side).

    Back to the point at hand - Keath's man was nowhere to be seen. Keath wasn't going to mark the ball - ALL he could achieve was:

    1/. Contacting a vulnerable Lynch and giving away a kick for front on contact.
    2/. Being hit hard by the Lynch/Jones combo coming the other way and knocked out of the game.

    The second one happened which was worst case but pretty clearly foreseeable.

    It would have been best (of course) if Jones had separated Lynch from the ball (and Keath) and allowed Keath the space to float back and take an uncontested mark - but two things got in the way:

    1/. Keath was WAY too high as the kick came in and it was kicked over his head. That is the golden rule of being a spare - don't position yourself where the ball can get kicked over you.
    2/. Jones doesn't defend that way - he sits off/uses his speed/judgement to impact on the contest...all good BUT it does limit his ability to control his oppo and protect the drop zone.

    I'm not a fan of Lynch or Richmond and this incident was a free-kick (high contact) but not a report. It's a MARKING CONTEST. I know everyone is going to quote the duty of care stuff at me but Keath HAD to expect contact in this situation and HAD to protect himself.
    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

  3. Likes 1eyedog, Sedat, Dry Rot, Grantysghost liked this post
  4. #1998
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,817
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Agreed. Keath would have benefitted the team more getting front and centre of that contest and having some trust in Jones. Hard decision to make for an intercept player though.

  5. #1999
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,240
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    Agreed. Keath would have benefitted the team more getting front and centre of that contest and having some trust in Jones. Hard decision to make for an intercept player though.
    I'm all for intercept marks. I would love to know how he was ever going to intercept that though?
    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

  6. #2000
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    4,606
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    It's fascinating.

    If you sped past a ground ball in dispute to concuss an opponent with a shoulder I think we all know what the consequences would be, but do it with an aerial ball and it's kosher.

    Perhaps Naughton should start trying this on chumps who dare block his leading lanes.
    BORDERLINE FLYING

  7. Likes bornadog, josie, jeemak liked this post
  8. #2001
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    5,193
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Gary Rohan's strategy to get off at the tribunal tomorrow ...

    Last edited by angelopetraglia; 12-04-2023 at 03:03 PM.

  9. Likes bornadog, josie, Bulldog4life liked this post
  10. #2002
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,253
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread



    Why isn't Lynch anywhere near the ball?
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  11. Likes josie, EasternWest liked this post
  12. #2003
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    5,193
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post


    Why isn't Lynch anywhere near the ball?
    Because he chose to pull out of the marking contest and bump. We were told that if you choose to bump, no matter the reasons and if even accidental, that you are responsible for your actions.

    However, the AFL play by random rules. The same as the crazy decision to let Cripps off last year. We need to protect the head! We keep allowing players to get concussed by players choosing to bump.

  13. Likes bornadog, josie, EasternWest liked this post
  14. #2004
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    9,151
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    I don't think you're allowed to 'concuss' a player but it was a marking contest...

    Do I wish Lynch just jumped at the footy? No - but he was not going to mark it...I don't understand the angst. Keath was brave in going back with the flight but to be truthful it also wasn't super clever - HE wasn't going to mark it either. Crozier does this a lot as well - he sticks his head in spots where it is simply going to get knocked off for NO GOOD REASON.

    If your oppo goes. You go. If he doesn't go...you STAY ON HIM (and stay goal side).

    Back to the point at hand - Keath's man was nowhere to be seen. Keath wasn't going to mark the ball - ALL he could achieve was:

    1/. Contacting a vulnerable Lynch and giving away a kick for front on contact.
    2/. Being hit hard by the Lynch/Jones combo coming the other way and knocked out of the game.

    The second one happened which was worst case but pretty clearly foreseeable.

    It would have been best (of course) if Jones had separated Lynch from the ball (and Keath) and allowed Keath the space to float back and take an uncontested mark - but two things got in the way:

    1/. Keath was WAY too high as the kick came in and it was kicked over his head. That is the golden rule of being a spare - don't position yourself where the ball can get kicked over you.
    2/. Jones doesn't defend that way - he sits off/uses his speed/judgement to impact on the contest...all good BUT it does limit his ability to control his oppo and protect the drop zone.

    I'm not a fan of Lynch or Richmond and this incident was a free-kick (high contact) but not a report. It's a MARKING CONTEST. I know everyone is going to quote the duty of care stuff at me but Keath HAD to expect contact in this situation and HAD to protect himself.
    I think this is wrong simply because Lynch wasn't in the marking contest at the point of contact. He changed direction to hit Keath.

    Whether Keath was in the wrong spot or not is irrelevant.
    "It's over. It's all over."

  15. Likes Mantis liked this post
  16. #2005
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,554
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by EasternWest View Post
    I think this is wrong simply because Lynch wasn't in the marking contest at the point of contact. He changed direction to hit Keath.

    Whether Keath was in the wrong spot or not is irrelevant.

  17. #2006
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,554
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post


    Why isn't Lynch anywhere near the ball?
    Why is Keath even there? It's the danger zone and he stuck his head into it.

  18. #2007
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,554
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    You all want goals and the game to flow etc however when one of our defenders decides to mindlessly sag into the path of probably the one forward who actually stands up for the forwards club everyone cracks it.

    Free the forwards!

  19. #2008
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,554
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by EasternWest View Post
    I think this is wrong simply because Lynch wasn't in the marking contest at the point of contact. He changed direction to hit Keath.

    Whether Keath was in the wrong spot or not is irrelevant.
    What about 1 second before the point of contact.

    Watch it in real time.

  20. #2009
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    9,151
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    Watch it in real time.
    Oh wow why haven't I thought of that yet.
    "It's over. It's all over."

  21. Likes jeemak liked this post
  22. #2010
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,165
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by EasternWest View Post
    Oh wow why haven't I thought of that yet.
    You're an idiot watching it in slo-mo all the time.
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •