Thanks Thanks:  98
Likes Likes:  1,022
Page 67 of 152 FirstFirst ... 17575859606162636465666768697071727374757677117 ... LastLast
Results 991 to 1,005 of 2278

Thread: MRO Thread

  1. #991
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Lot worse than the Crozier one
    He won’t escape that

  2. #992
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,214
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Lynch once more gets away with it. AFL want him in the big game on Thursday night
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  3. Likes Testekill liked this post
  4. #993
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,087
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Lynch once more gets away with it. AFL want him in the big game on Thursday night
    This case against Lynch has been correctly assessed. There was absolutely nothing in it, despite Hurley trying to manufacture something else.

    Lynch should have been suspended the previous week, but you can't revisit that one.
    Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured

  5. Likes azabob liked this post
  6. #994
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kyabram
    Posts
    13,890
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Lynch once more gets away with it. AFL want him in the big game on Thursday night
    Surely you dont want footballers missing games because of soft stuff like that?
    The curse is dead.

  7. #995
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,517
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    I dont get the point of the 3 strikes goes to the tribunal system ? If that's the case you have to be tried on all 3 right? If its just the last one, which in this case was nothing whats the point.

    I'm missing something surely.

  8. #996
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,214
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by chef View Post
    Surely you dont want footballers missing games because of soft stuff like that?
    Agree, but I am still angry at Redpath getting 2 weeks for the same thing and one more on appeal. The only difference was Davis dropped to the ground, and GWS medicos lied
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  9. Likes Testekill liked this post
  10. #997
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    I dont get the point of the 3 strikes goes to the tribunal system ? If that's the case you have to be tried on all 3 right? If its just the last one, which in this case was nothing whats the point.

    I'm missing something surely.
    You have to actually commit an offence before priors come into it. If you are found not guilty of stealing a car you can hardly be sentenced on the basis that you have previously been guilty of stealing cars.

  11. #998
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,517
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Axe Man View Post
    You have to actually commit an offence before priors come into it. If you are found not guilty of stealing a car you can hardly be sentenced on the basis that you have previously been guilty of stealing cars.
    It's not a court of law so not sure the analogy works, however your concept makes sense to me.
    Why have a 3 strikes system at all if none of the offences merit a suspension. As this case clearly was. Either take into account an accrued total and get a week or just get on with it. I vote the latter.

  12. #999
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    It's not a court of law so not sure the analogy works, however your concept makes sense to me.
    Why have a 3 strikes system at all if none of the offences merit a suspension. As this case clearly was. Either take into account an accrued total and get a week or just get on with it. I vote the latter.
    If he had have been found guilty of the strike he would likely have received a 1 week suspension due to the previous 3 strikes, where in isolation it would have been only a fine.

  13. #1000
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,517
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Axe Man View Post
    If he had have been found guilty of the strike he would likely have received a 1 week suspension due to the previous 3 strikes, where in isolation it would have been only a fine.
    Thanks for explaining.
    I'm not a fan of that system at all ! What if he does it again next week do the strikes start again. Ambiguity reigns supreme.
    I think just take each case on it's merit, or accrue points towards a suspension like we used to have from memory.

  14. #1001
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,214
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    I thought these were all auto one week now?

    Ed Langdon, Melbourne, has been charged with Rough Conduct (Dangerous Tackle) against Laitham Vandermeer, Western Bulldogs, during the third quarter of the Round 13 match between the Western Bulldogs and Melbourne, played at Metricon Stadium on Saturday August 22.
    Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Careless Conduct, Low Impact and High Contact. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction as a first offence.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  15. #1002
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    I thought these were all auto one week now?
    Low impact = fine. Medium impact = 1 week (what Dahlhaus and Crozier have received).

  16. Thanks bornadog thanked for this post
  17. #1003
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Surprise , surprise, surprise
    Dahlhaus cleared
    What an absolute disgrace. Once again the afl gets all tough on dangerous tackles then cools off
    Tribunal is in disarray

  18. Likes Testekill liked this post
  19. #1004
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Hayden Crozier is owed a game of football

  20. Likes Testekill liked this post
  21. #1005
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,806
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Too bad Crozier didn’t do his tackle this week. Would have gotten off in this weeks MRO spin the suspension wheel

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •