Thanks Thanks:  57
Likes Likes:  679
Page 81 of 109 FirstFirst ... 317177787980818283848591 ... LastLast
Results 1,201 to 1,215 of 1633

Thread: MRO Thread

  1. #1201
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    6,696
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Caleb and the club have accepted the one match ban.

  2. #1202
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    49,476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Axe Man View Post
    Caleb and the club have accepted the one match ban.
    Totally and utterly ridiculous. The club has no hope to defend this, the AFL reporting Caleb - really they have lost the plot
    FFC: Established 1877

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  3. #1203
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    30,175
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Axe Man View Post
    Caleb and the club have accepted the one match ban.
    One of the Brisbane supporters said it was similar to a wrestling maneuver called a DDT. He said Daniel could have gotten the 3 count.

    Was there any risk in challenging it? I suspect we have reluctantly accepted that Caleb was in the wrong.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  4. #1204
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    49,476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    One of the Brisbane supporters said it was similar to a wrestling maneuver called a DDT. He said Daniel could have gotten the 3 count.

    Was there any risk in challenging it? I suspect we have reluctantly accepted that Caleb was in the wrong.
    Everytime we challenge we lose, so I don't blame the club.
    FFC: Established 1877

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  5. #1205
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,772
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    I suspect it gives CD a week to clear his head and restart his season - hasn't had the best start.

  6. #1206
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    5,943
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    It's a significant injury received by May.
    From "incidental" contact.

    We can't have players rubbed out for "incidental" contact.
    "It's over. It's all over."

  7. Likes GVGjr liked this post
  8. #1207
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7,070
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    One of the Brisbane supporters said it was similar to a wrestling maneuver called a DDT. He said Daniel could have gotten the 3 count.

    Was there any risk in challenging it? I suspect we have reluctantly accepted that Caleb was in the wrong.
    Ridiculous. Everyone knows that nobody gets up from the DDT.
    - RIP Goldstein for 2021 First - 2020-2020 -

  9. Likes ratsmac liked this post
  10. #1208
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Eastern Suburbs
    Posts
    3,062
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by azabob View Post
    I can understand how Daniel is charged and suspended for 1 week.

    What I do not understand is how Harbrow isn't at least cited for this bump on Gibbons.


    https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl...41d8ec72146173
    Totally agree with this.
    Harbrow seemed to run slightly by the ball and went for impact instead of the footy which got Gibbons high.

  11. #1209
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    12,995
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    If you think we’ve been hard done by spare a thought for Norf (Cunnington)... that one has me completely puzzled.

  12. #1210
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    49,476
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    If you think we’ve been hard done by spare a thought for Norf (Cunnington)... that one has me completely puzzled.
    Just saw that - I have no words. Wow.
    FFC: Established 1877

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  13. #1211
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    5,943
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    If you think we’ve been hard done by spare a thought for Norf (Cunnington)... that one has me completely puzzled.
    Crimes against hairmanity.
    "It's over. It's all over."

  14. Likes jeemak liked this post
  15. #1212
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Eastern Suburbs
    Posts
    3,062
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    If you think we’ve been hard done by spare a thought for Norf (Cunnington)... that one has me completely puzzled.
    Norf have to appeal that. What an horrendous MRO decision. They’ve completely lost the plot.

  16. #1213
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    13,755
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    I mean I'm happy because it's Norf, but that is genuinely disgraceful on all other fronts.

  17. #1214
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,772
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc26 View Post
    Norf have to appeal that. What an horrendous MRO decision. They’ve completely lost the plot.
    I don't agree. Cunnington went the bump. Could have tried to tackle; could have tried to smother, but wen the bump and got his man high.

  18. #1215
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    12,995
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: MRO Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by FrediKanoute View Post
    I don't agree. Cunnington went the bump. Could have tried to tackle; could have tried to smother, but wen the bump and got his man high.
    When you see it on the reversal angle (which I hadn't seen when I made the comment) you see the shoulder make contact with the chin, but the impact is extremely low and it shouldn't be a reportable offence.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •