Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  22
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 68
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,015
    Post Thanks / Like

    Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    This is a sorry development. Please comment being mindful the matter is before the courts:

    https://www.theage.com.au/national/v...01-p4zcpg.html
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,140
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Not surprised
    Last edited by bornadog; 02-05-2018 at 11:32 PM. Reason: typo
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,815
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Seems the law has been keeping an eye for a while .
    Love his quirkiness but sadly it seems it's from illegal means.
    He is one of a kind that has lost his way .
    Very successful person but the devil has taken hold.
    Life is full of these stories, it's sad and it robs the world of amazing people.
    Bring back the biff

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,350
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    This is a sorry development. Please comment being mindful the matter is before the courts:

    https://www.theage.com.au/national/v...01-p4zcpg.html
    The charges seem at the very low end, that is, there's no (whatever the current terms are) 'traffick large quantity', 'traffick commercial quantity' or 'traffick large commercial quantity'. The possession charges are nothing unless it's a huge quantity, which it seems not to be. A good barrister should be able to get these charges pleaded down with extenuating circumstances, great character references and commitment to a community based order or similar. I'm sure times have changed since it was my day job, but I can't remember too many getting impriosmemt for similar charges that had a good barrister. Hopefully, he gets his life together.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  5. Likes Ghost Dog liked this post
  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,300
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Jake has joined a fine club full of illustrious role models.
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  7. Likes bornadog, Twodogs liked this post
  8. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    The charges seem at the very low end, that is, there's no (whatever the current terms are) 'traffick large quantity', 'traffick commercial quantity' or 'traffick large commercial quantity'. The possession charges are nothing unless it's a huge quantity, which it seems not to be. A good barrister should be able to get these charges pleaded down with extenuating circumstances, great character references and commitment to a community based order or similar. I'm sure times have changed since it was my day job, but I can't remember too many getting impriosmemt for similar charges that had a good barrister. Hopefully, he gets his life together.
    Isn't traffick Commercial Quanity the one they reverse the Burden of Proof for? The defence's job is to prove their client wasn't intending to sell the drugs for profit.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,300
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Nearly a kilo is a lot of E.
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry Rot View Post
    Nearly a kilo is a lot of E.

    Where did you read that?

    It's a shedload of disco bikkies.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,350
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry Rot View Post
    Nearly a kilo is a lot of E.
    I didn't see that in his charges. That would change things badly in has favour if that's the amount.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,666
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    All, we need to be somewhat factual if we are referring to the charges or quantities. Rumours will have the posts removed.

    Reliable sources or speculation can't be accepted.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  13. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    108
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Twodogs View Post
    Isn't traffick Commercial Quanity the one they reverse the Burden of Proof for? The defence's job is to prove their client wasn't intending to sell the drugs for profit.
    That will be tricky given they have found scales and clear plastic zip bags in his room. Really sorry situation

  14. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    No doubt the “ Top Bloke “ card will be out in spades

  15. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,300
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Twodogs View Post
    Where did you read that?

    It's a shedload of disco bikkies.
    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    I didn't see that in his charges. That would change things badly in has favour if that's the amount.

    OK, this article resolves the facts.

    https://www.smh.com.au/national/vict...01-p4zcpg.html

    The cops found more than a kilo of eccies in Bomber's house, but stuffed up the DNA analysis with most of it, so Bomber only got charged with 134 gms.

    The scales, bags etc don't look too good though.
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  16. Thanks Twodogs thanked for this post
  17. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,561
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Funke disco View Post
    That will be tricky given they have found scales and clear plastic zip bags in his room. Really sorry situation
    I was in the Brisbane Magistrates court in 2001 because my housemate was up on a DD charge. The case before was a guy who had been busted with a sizeable quantity of marijuana, neatly packed into little ounce bags in his car. He pleaded that he was a really organised person and that the gear was for personal consumption. The Magistrate agreed - non-custodial sentence.

  18. Likes Twodogs, Ghost Dog liked this post
  19. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,891
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mark Thompson - Serious Drugs Charges

    Going back to late 2014 on this forum when we were discussing potential coaches, you can see some related stuff mentioned re Mr Thompson.

    Can’t believe I’m saying this, but I hope he’s an addict - not a dealer or trafficker..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •